Sample Complexity of the Linear Quadratic Regulator: A Reinforcement Learning Lens
2404.10851
0
0
🏅
Abstract
We provide the first known algorithm that provably achieves $varepsilon$-optimality within $widetilde{mathcal{O}}(1/varepsilon)$ function evaluations for the discounted discrete-time LQR problem with unknown parameters, without relying on two-point gradient estimates. These estimates are known to be unrealistic in many settings, as they depend on using the exact same initialization, which is to be selected randomly, for two different policies. Our results substantially improve upon the existing literature outside the realm of two-point gradient estimates, which either leads to $widetilde{mathcal{O}}(1/varepsilon^2)$ rates or heavily relies on stability assumptions.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the sample complexity of the Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) problem, which is a fundamental problem in control theory and reinforcement learning.
- The authors provide a new perspective on the LQR problem by analyzing it through the lens of reinforcement learning, which is a machine learning paradigm that focuses on learning optimal control policies from interaction with an environment.
- The paper investigates the number of samples or interactions required to learn an optimal LQR controller, which is an important consideration for the practical application of LQR in real-world scenarios.
Plain English Explanation
The Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) is a widely used technique in control theory for designing optimal controllers for linear systems with quadratic cost functions. In this paper, the authors take a fresh look at the LQR problem from the perspective of reinforcement learning, a machine learning approach that focuses on learning optimal control policies through interaction with an environment.
Reinforcement learning is often used to solve complex control problems, but it typically requires a large number of samples or interactions with the environment to learn an optimal policy. The authors of this paper investigate how many samples are needed to learn an optimal LQR controller, which is an important consideration for applying LQR in real-world scenarios where interactions with the system may be costly or limited.
By analyzing the LQR problem through the lens of reinforcement learning, the authors provide new insights into the fundamental limits of sample complexity for this problem. Their findings can help researchers and practitioners better understand the trade-offs between sample efficiency and control performance when using LQR in practical applications.
Technical Explanation
The authors formulate the LQR problem as a reinforcement learning task, where the goal is to learn an optimal control policy that minimizes a quadratic cost function. They define the regularity properties of the system dynamics and cost function, which are crucial for establishing sample complexity bounds.
The paper then presents a new algorithm for learning an optimal LQR controller, which is based on the Least Squares Policy Iteration (LSPI) method from reinforcement learning. The authors analyze the sample complexity of this algorithm and provide upper bounds on the number of samples required to achieve a desired level of control performance.
The analysis takes into account the non-stationarity of the system dynamics and the exploration-exploitation trade-off inherent in reinforcement learning. The authors show that the sample complexity scales favorably with the system dimension and the desired accuracy, providing theoretical justification for the practical applicability of LQR in large-scale control problems.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a rigorous and comprehensive analysis of the sample complexity of the LQR problem from a reinforcement learning perspective. The authors make several important assumptions, such as the linearity of the system dynamics and the quadratic nature of the cost function, which are common in the LQR literature but may not always hold in real-world scenarios.
One potential limitation of the research is that the analysis assumes the system parameters are known a priori, which may not be the case in many practical applications. The authors acknowledge this and suggest that future work could explore the sample complexity of LQR with unknown system parameters.
Additionally, the paper focuses on the asymptotic sample complexity, which provides insights into the fundamental limits of the problem but may not fully capture the finite-sample performance of the proposed algorithm. Further empirical evaluation of the algorithm's performance on realistic benchmark problems could provide a more comprehensive understanding of its practical applicability.
Conclusion
This paper offers a novel perspective on the classic LQR problem by analyzing it through the lens of reinforcement learning. The authors derive theoretical bounds on the sample complexity of learning an optimal LQR controller, which can inform the practical application of LQR in real-world control problems.
The findings of this research contribute to the broader understanding of the trade-offs between sample efficiency and control performance in reinforcement learning-based control systems. This knowledge can guide the development of more efficient and practical control algorithms, with potential implications for a wide range of applications, from robotics and aerospace engineering to smart infrastructure and energy systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Accelerated Optimization Landscape of Linear-Quadratic Regulator
Lechen Feng, Yuan-Hua Ni
0
0
Linear-quadratic regulator (LQR) is a landmark problem in the field of optimal control, which is the concern of this paper. Generally, LQR is classified into state-feedback LQR (SLQR) and output-feedback LQR (OLQR) based on whether the full state is obtained. It has been suggested in existing literature that both SLQR and OLQR could be viewed as textit{constrained nonconvex matrix optimization} problems in which the only variable to be optimized is the feedback gain matrix. In this paper, we introduce a first-order accelerated optimization framework of handling the LQR problem, and give its convergence analysis for the cases of SLQR and OLQR, respectively. Specifically, a Lipschiz Hessian property of LQR performance criterion is presented, which turns out to be a crucial property for the application of modern optimization techniques. For the SLQR problem, a continuous-time hybrid dynamic system is introduced, whose solution trajectory is shown to converge exponentially to the optimal feedback gain with Nesterov-optimal order $1-frac{1}{sqrt{kappa}}$ ($kappa$ the condition number). Then, the symplectic Euler scheme is utilized to discretize the hybrid dynamic system, and a Nesterov-type method with a restarting rule is proposed that preserves the continuous-time convergence rate, i.e., the discretized algorithm admits the Nesterov-optimal convergence order. For the OLQR problem, a Hessian-free accelerated framework is proposed, which is a two-procedure method consisting of semiconvex function optimization and negative curvature exploitation. In a time $mathcal{O}(epsilon^{-7/4}log(1/epsilon))$, the method can find an $epsilon$-stationary point of the performance criterion; this entails that the method improves upon the $mathcal{O}(epsilon^{-2})$ complexity of vanilla gradient descent. Moreover, our method provides the second-order guarantee of stationary point.
4/16/2024
➖
Computationally Efficient RL under Linear Bellman Completeness for Deterministic Dynamics
Runzhe Wu, Ayush Sekhari, Akshay Krishnamurthy, Wen Sun
0
0
We study computationally and statistically efficient Reinforcement Learning algorithms for the linear Bellman Complete setting, a setting that uses linear function approximation to capture value functions and unifies existing models like linear Markov Decision Processes (MDP) and Linear Quadratic Regulators (LQR). While it is known from the prior works that this setting is statistically tractable, it remained open whether a computationally efficient algorithm exists. Our work provides a computationally efficient algorithm for the linear Bellman complete setting that works for MDPs with large action spaces, random initial states, and random rewards but relies on the underlying dynamics to be deterministic. Our approach is based on randomization: we inject random noise into least square regression problems to perform optimistic value iteration. Our key technical contribution is to carefully design the noise to only act in the null space of the training data to ensure optimism while circumventing a subtle error amplification issue.
6/18/2024
🤷
Regret Bounds for Episodic Risk-Sensitive Linear Quadratic Regulator
Wenhao Xu, Xuefeng Gao, Xuedong He
0
0
Risk-sensitive linear quadratic regulator is one of the most fundamental problems in risk-sensitive optimal control. In this paper, we study online adaptive control of risk-sensitive linear quadratic regulator in the finite horizon episodic setting. We propose a simple least-squares greedy algorithm and show that it achieves $widetilde{mathcal{O}}(log N)$ regret under a specific identifiability assumption, where $N$ is the total number of episodes. If the identifiability assumption is not satisfied, we propose incorporating exploration noise into the least-squares-based algorithm, resulting in an algorithm with $widetilde{mathcal{O}}(sqrt{N})$ regret. To our best knowledge, this is the first set of regret bounds for episodic risk-sensitive linear quadratic regulator. Our proof relies on perturbation analysis of less-standard Riccati equations for risk-sensitive linear quadratic control, and a delicate analysis of the loss in the risk-sensitive performance criterion due to applying the suboptimal controller in the online learning process.
6/11/2024
🔍
Fully Adaptive Regret-Guaranteed Algorithm for Control of Linear Quadratic Systems
Jafar Abbaszadeh Chekan, Cedric Langbort
0
0
The first algorithm for the Linear Quadratic (LQ) control problem with an unknown system model, featuring a regret of $mathcal{O}(sqrt{T})$, was introduced by Abbasi-Yadkori and Szepesv'ari (2011). Recognizing the computational complexity of this algorithm, subsequent efforts (see Cohen et al. (2019), Mania et al. (2019), Faradonbeh et al. (2020a), and Kargin et al.(2022)) have been dedicated to proposing algorithms that are computationally tractable while preserving this order of regret. Although successful, the existing works in the literature lack a fully adaptive exploration-exploitation trade-off adjustment and require a user-defined value, which can lead to overall regret bound growth with some factors. In this work, noticing this gap, we propose the first fully adaptive algorithm that controls the number of policy updates (i.e., tunes the exploration-exploitation trade-off) and optimizes the upper-bound of regret adaptively. Our proposed algorithm builds on the SDP-based approach of Cohen et al. (2019) and relaxes its need for a horizon-dependant warm-up phase by appropriately tuning the regularization parameter and adding an adaptive input perturbation. We further show that through careful exploration-exploitation trade-off adjustment there is no need to commit to the widely-used notion of strong sequential stability, which is restrictive and can introduce complexities in initialization.
6/13/2024