Five Key Enablers for Communication during and after Disasters

Read original: arXiv:2409.06822 - Published 9/12/2024 by Mohammad Shehab, Mustafa Kishk, Maurilio Matracia, Mehdi Bennis, Mohamed-Slim Alouini
Total Score

0

Five Key Enablers for Communication during and after Disasters

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Outlines five key enablers for effective communication during and after disasters
  • Discusses the importance of robust communication infrastructure, resilient connectivity, interoperable systems, trusted information sharing, and coordination among stakeholders
  • Highlights how these enablers can enhance disaster response and recovery efforts

Plain English Explanation

The research paper discusses [object Object] that can improve communication during and after disasters.

The first enabler is robust communication infrastructure. This means having reliable and redundant communication systems that can withstand the effects of disasters and continue to function. This could include things like [object Object] provided by technologies like [object Object] and [object Object].

The second enabler is interoperable systems. This means having communication technologies and platforms that can work together seamlessly, allowing different organizations and responders to coordinate effectively.

The third enabler is trusted information sharing. This involves establishing reliable channels for sharing critical information during a disaster, while also [object Object] of the information.

The fourth enabler is coordination among stakeholders. This includes having clear protocols and procedures in place for how different agencies, organizations, and community groups will work together during disaster response and recovery efforts.

The fifth enabler is situational awareness. This means having a comprehensive understanding of the evolving situation on the ground, which can inform decision-making and resource allocation.

Together, these five enablers can help improve the effectiveness of communication and coordination during and after disasters, ultimately enhancing overall disaster resilience.

Technical Explanation

The research paper examines [object Object] that can enhance communication and coordination during and after disasters:

  1. Robust Communication Infrastructure: Ensuring the availability of reliable and redundant communication systems that can withstand the effects of disasters. This includes leveraging technologies like [object Object] provided by [object Object] and [object Object].

  2. Interoperable Systems: Ensuring that communication technologies and platforms can work together seamlessly, enabling different organizations and responders to coordinate effectively.

  3. Trusted Information Sharing: Establishing reliable channels for sharing critical information during a disaster, while also [object Object] of the information.

  4. Coordination Among Stakeholders: Having clear protocols and procedures in place for how different agencies, organizations, and community groups will work together during disaster response and recovery efforts.

  5. Situational Awareness: Maintaining a comprehensive understanding of the evolving situation on the ground, which can inform decision-making and resource allocation.

The paper discusses the importance of these enablers and how they can be implemented to enhance disaster response and recovery efforts.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a well-researched and comprehensive overview of the key enablers for effective communication during and after disasters. However, it is important to note that the implementation of these enablers may face certain challenges and limitations:

  1. Infrastructure Resilience: Ensuring the resilience of communication infrastructure can be costly and may require significant investment in redundant systems and backup power sources.

  2. Interoperability Challenges: Achieving seamless interoperability among diverse communication systems and platforms may require extensive coordination, standardization, and integration efforts.

  3. Trust and Bias in Information Sharing: Establishing trusted information-sharing channels and minimizing bias can be complex, especially in the context of rapidly evolving disaster situations.

  4. Coordination Complexities: Coordinating the efforts of various stakeholders, each with their own priorities and protocols, can be a significant challenge during disaster response.

  5. Situational Awareness Limitations: Maintaining comprehensive situational awareness can be hampered by limited data, connectivity, or access to affected areas, especially in the immediate aftermath of a disaster.

The paper could have further explored these potential limitations and provided more insights into strategies for addressing them. Additionally, it might have been beneficial to include perspectives from disaster response practitioners to better understand the practical challenges and considerations in implementing these enablers.

Conclusion

The research paper highlights five crucial enablers for enhancing communication and coordination during and after disasters: robust communication infrastructure, interoperable systems, trusted information sharing, coordination among stakeholders, and situational awareness. These enablers can significantly improve disaster response and recovery efforts, ultimately strengthening overall disaster resilience.

While the paper provides a strong conceptual foundation, the successful implementation of these enablers may face various challenges and limitations that warrant further exploration. Nonetheless, the insights presented in this paper provide a valuable framework for stakeholders, policymakers, and disaster management practitioners to consider as they work towards building more resilient and effective communication systems for disaster scenarios.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Five Key Enablers for Communication during and after Disasters
Total Score

0

Five Key Enablers for Communication during and after Disasters

Mohammad Shehab, Mustafa Kishk, Maurilio Matracia, Mehdi Bennis, Mohamed-Slim Alouini

Civilian communication during disasters such as earthquakes, floods, and military conflicts is crucial for saving lives. Nevertheless, several challenges exist during these circumstances such as the destruction of cellular communication and electricity infrastructure, lack of line of sight (LoS), and difficulty of localization under the rubble. In this article, we discuss key enablers that can boost communication during disasters, namely, satellite and aerial platforms, redundancy, silencing, and sustainable networks aided with wireless energy transfer (WET). The article also highlights how these solutions can be implemented in order to solve the failure of communication during disasters. Finally, it sheds light on unresolved challenges, as well as future research directions.

Read more

9/12/2024

Enhancing Resiliency of Integrated Space-Air-Ground-Sea Networks with Renewable Energies: A Use Case After the 2023 Turkiye Earthquake
Total Score

0

Enhancing Resiliency of Integrated Space-Air-Ground-Sea Networks with Renewable Energies: A Use Case After the 2023 Turkiye Earthquake

Bilal Karaman, Ilhan Basturk, Sezai Taskin, Ferdi Kara, Engin Zeydan, Halim Yanikomeroglu

Natural disasters can have catastrophic consequences, a poignant example is the series of $7.7$ and $7.6$ magnitude earthquakes that devastated Turkiye on February 6, 2023. To limit the damage, it is essential to maintain the communications infrastructure to ensure individuals impacted by the disaster can receive critical information. The disastrous earthquakes in Turkiye have revealed the importance of considering communications and energy solutions together to build resilient and sustainable infrastructure. Thus, this paper proposes an integrated space-air-ground-sea network architecture that utilizes various communications and energy-enabling technologies. This study aims to contribute to the development of robust and sustainable disaster-response frameworks. In light of the Turkiye earthquakes, two methods for network management are proposed: the first aims to ensure sustainability in the pre-disaster phase and the second aims to maintain communications during the in-disaster phase. In these frameworks, communications technologies such as High Altitude Platform Station(s)(HAPS), which are among the key enablers to unlock the potential of 6G networks, and energy technologies such as Renewable Energy Sources (RES), Battery Energy Storage Systems (BESSs), and Electric Vehicles (EVs) have been used as the prominent technologies. By simulating a case study, we demonstrate the performance of a proposed framework for providing network resiliency. The paper concludes with potential challenges and future directions to achieve a disaster-resilient network architecture solution.

Read more

5/29/2024

The Rise of UAV Fleet Technologies for Emergency Wireless Communications in Harsh Environments
Total Score

0

The Rise of UAV Fleet Technologies for Emergency Wireless Communications in Harsh Environments

Zhuohui Yao, Wenchi Cheng, Wei Zhang, Tao Zhang, Hailin Zhang

For unforeseen emergencies, such as natural disasters and pandemic events, it is highly demanded to cope with the explosive growth of mobile data traffic in extremely critical environments. An Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) fleet is an effective way to facilitate the Emergency wireless COmmunication NETwork (EcoNet). In this article, a MUlti-tier Heterogeneous UAV Network (MuHun), which is with different UAV fleets in different altitudes, is proposed to flexibly serve various emergencies. We refresh the key performance indicators of full coverage, network capacity, low latency, and energy efficiency in harsh environments. Then, we present the special challenges regarding shadowing-dominated complex channel model, energy supply limited short-endurance, various communication mechanisms coexistence, and communication island for underground users in UAV-based EcoNet, followed by the MuHun-based EcoNet architecture and its advantages. Furthermore, some potential solutions such as the new hybrid-channel adapted resource allocation, reconfigurable intelligent surface assisted UAV communications, competitive heterogenous-networks, and magnetic induction based air-to-ground/underground communications are discussed to effectively achieve full coverage, high capacity, high energy efficiency, and diverse qualities of services for EcoNets in harsh environments.

Read more

7/25/2024

🔗

Total Score

0

Multi-Tier Non-Terrestrial Networking for Disaster Communications: A Layered Clustering Approach

Metin Ozturk, Berk c{C}ilou{g}lu, Gorkem Berkay Koc{c}, Halim Yanikomeroglu

It is crucial to deploy temporary non-terrestrial networks (NTN) in disaster situations where terrestrial networks are no longer operable. Deploying uncrewed aerial vehicle base stations (UAV-BSs) can provide a radio access network (RAN); however, the backhaul link may also be damaged and unserviceable in such disaster conditions. In this regard, high-altitude platform stations (HAPS) spark attention as they can be deployed as super macro base stations (SMBS) and data centers. Therefore, in this study, we investigate a three-layer heterogeneous network with different topologies to prolong the lifespan of the temporary network by using UAV-BSs for RAN services and HAPS-SMBS as a backhaul. Furthermore, a two-layer clustering algorithm is proposed to handle the UAV-BS ad-hoc networking effectively.

Read more

4/24/2024