Fixed Confidence Best Arm Identification in the Bayesian Setting

Read original: arXiv:2402.10429 - Published 6/26/2024 by Kyoungseok Jang, Junpei Komiyama, Kazutoshi Yamazaki
Total Score

0

🔍

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a new algorithm for identifying the best arm (i.e., the most rewarding option) in a Bayesian multi-armed bandit setting with a fixed confidence level.
  • The authors introduce a novel approach called "Fixed Confidence Best Arm Identification in the Bayesian Setting" (FCBA) that aims to find the best arm with high probability while minimizing the number of arm pulls required.
  • The FCBA algorithm is designed to work in Bayesian settings, where the reward distributions of the arms are initially unknown and must be learned through experimentation.
  • The authors provide theoretical guarantees on the performance of FCBA and demonstrate its effectiveness through empirical evaluations.

Plain English Explanation

In a multi-armed bandit problem, you have a number of "arms" (options) that you can pull, and each arm gives you a different reward. Your goal is to find the arm that gives you the highest average reward, but you don't know the rewards ahead of time. Instead, you have to "pull" the arms and observe the rewards to figure out which one is the best.

The authors of this paper propose a new algorithm, called FCBA, that helps you identify the best arm in a Bayesian setting. In a Bayesian setting, you start with some initial beliefs about the rewards of the arms, and then update those beliefs as you gather more information by pulling the arms.

The key idea behind FCBA is to find the best arm while minimizing the number of times you need to pull the arms. This is important because pulling arms can be costly or time-consuming, so you want to do it as little as possible. FCBA does this by using a clever statistical technique to quickly narrow down the set of potential best arms and focus your efforts on the most promising ones.

The authors show that FCBA has strong theoretical guarantees, meaning that it can reliably identify the best arm with a high degree of confidence. They also demonstrate through experiments that FCBA outperforms other state-of-the-art algorithms for this problem.

Technical Explanation

The fixed confidence best arm identification problem in a Bayesian multi-armed bandit setting is formulated as follows: there are K arms, each with an unknown reward distribution, and the goal is to identify the arm with the highest expected reward with a pre-specified confidence level.

The authors introduce the "Fixed Confidence Best Arm Identification in the Bayesian Setting" (FCBA) algorithm to solve this problem. FCBA works by maintaining a set of "potential best arms" and selectively pulling arms to quickly eliminate suboptimal arms and converge to the true best arm.

The key components of FCBA are:

  1. Bayesian Posterior Updating: FCBA uses Bayesian inference to update its beliefs about the arms' reward distributions as it gathers more observations.
  2. Optimistic and Pessimistic Estimates: FCBA computes optimistic and pessimistic estimates of each arm's expected reward to guide the arm selection process.
  3. Termination Condition: FCBA continues pulling arms until it can confidently identify the best arm with the pre-specified confidence level.

The authors provide theoretical analyses to show that FCBA achieves the desired confidence level while minimizing the number of arm pulls required. They also demonstrate the empirical performance of FCBA on various benchmark problems, including comparisons to other state-of-the-art best arm identification algorithms.

Critical Analysis

The authors have made several important contributions with this work:

  1. They introduced a novel algorithm, FCBA, that can efficiently identify the best arm in a Bayesian multi-armed bandit setting with a pre-specified confidence level.
  2. They provided strong theoretical guarantees on the performance of FCBA, demonstrating its optimality in terms of the number of arm pulls required.
  3. They showed through extensive experiments that FCBA outperforms other state-of-the-art algorithms for this problem.

However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

  • The paper focuses on the fixed confidence setting, but in many real-world applications, the desired confidence level may not be known a priori. An extension to the variable confidence setting could be valuable.
  • The authors assume that the reward distributions of the arms are independent. Relaxing this assumption to allow for correlated reward distributions could broaden the applicability of the approach.
  • The theoretical analysis relies on certain assumptions, such as the existence of a unique best arm. Exploring the performance of FCBA in more general settings could provide additional insights.
  • The paper does not consider the case where the best arm may change over time (i.e., a restless bandit setting). Extending FCBA to handle this scenario could be an interesting direction for future research.

Overall, this paper makes a significant contribution to the field of Bayesian multi-armed bandits and provides a promising approach for efficiently identifying the best arm in a fixed confidence setting.

Conclusion

The "Fixed Confidence Best Arm Identification in the Bayesian Setting" (FCBA) algorithm proposed in this paper offers a novel and effective solution to the problem of identifying the best arm in a Bayesian multi-armed bandit problem. By leveraging Bayesian inference, optimistic and pessimistic estimates, and a carefully designed termination condition, FCBA can reliably find the best arm while minimizing the number of arm pulls required.

The strong theoretical guarantees and empirical performance demonstrated in the paper suggest that FCBA could be a valuable tool for a wide range of applications, from online recommendation systems to adaptive clinical trials. As the authors have highlighted, there are also several promising directions for future research, such as extending FCBA to handle more complex bandit settings or relaxing some of the underlying assumptions.

Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to the field of Bayesian optimization and multi-armed bandits, and the FCBA algorithm represents a significant step forward in the quest to efficiently identify the best option among a set of unknown alternatives.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🔍

Total Score

0

Fixed Confidence Best Arm Identification in the Bayesian Setting

Kyoungseok Jang, Junpei Komiyama, Kazutoshi Yamazaki

We consider the fixed-confidence best arm identification (FC-BAI) problem in the Bayesian setting. This problem aims to find the arm of the largest mean with a fixed confidence level when the bandit model has been sampled from the known prior. Most studies on the FC-BAI problem have been conducted in the frequentist setting, where the bandit model is predetermined before the game starts. We show that the traditional FC-BAI algorithms studied in the frequentist setting, such as track-and-stop and top-two algorithms, result in arbitrarily suboptimal performances in the Bayesian setting. We also obtain a lower bound of the expected number of samples in the Bayesian setting and introduce a variant of successive elimination that has a matching performance with the lower bound up to a logarithmic factor. Simulations verify the theoretical results.

Read more

6/26/2024

🔎

Total Score

0

New!Best Arm Identification with Minimal Regret

Junwen Yang, Vincent Y. F. Tan, Tianyuan Jin

Motivated by real-world applications that necessitate responsible experimentation, we introduce the problem of best arm identification (BAI) with minimal regret. This innovative variant of the multi-armed bandit problem elegantly amalgamates two of its most ubiquitous objectives: regret minimization and BAI. More precisely, the agent's goal is to identify the best arm with a prescribed confidence level $delta$, while minimizing the cumulative regret up to the stopping time. Focusing on single-parameter exponential families of distributions, we leverage information-theoretic techniques to establish an instance-dependent lower bound on the expected cumulative regret. Moreover, we present an intriguing impossibility result that underscores the tension between cumulative regret and sample complexity in fixed-confidence BAI. Complementarily, we design and analyze the Double KL-UCB algorithm, which achieves asymptotic optimality as the confidence level tends to zero. Notably, this algorithm employs two distinct confidence bounds to guide arm selection in a randomized manner. Our findings elucidate a fresh perspective on the inherent connections between regret minimization and BAI.

Read more

9/30/2024

UCB Exploration for Fixed-Budget Bayesian Best Arm Identification
Total Score

0

UCB Exploration for Fixed-Budget Bayesian Best Arm Identification

Rong J. B. Zhu, Yanqi Qiu

We study best-arm identification (BAI) in the fixed-budget setting. Adaptive allocations based on upper confidence bounds (UCBs), such as UCBE, are known to work well in BAI. However, it is well-known that its optimal regret is theoretically dependent on instances, which we show to be an artifact in many fixed-budget BAI problems. In this paper we propose an UCB exploration algorithm that is both theoretically and empirically efficient for the fixed budget BAI problem under a Bayesian setting. The key idea is to learn prior information, which can enhance the performance of UCB-based BAI algorithm as it has done in the cumulative regret minimization problem. We establish bounds on the failure probability and the simple regret for the Bayesian BAI problem, providing upper bounds of order $tilde{O}(sqrt{K/n})$, up to logarithmic factors, where $n$ represents the budget and $K$ denotes the number of arms. Furthermore, we demonstrate through empirical results that our approach consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines.

Read more

8/12/2024

🛠️

Total Score

0

Optimal Best Arm Identification with Fixed Confidence in Restless Bandits

P. N. Karthik, Vincent Y. F. Tan, Arpan Mukherjee, Ali Tajer

We study best arm identification in a restless multi-armed bandit setting with finitely many arms. The discrete-time data generated by each arm forms a homogeneous Markov chain taking values in a common, finite state space. The state transitions in each arm are captured by an ergodic transition probability matrix (TPM) that is a member of a single-parameter exponential family of TPMs. The real-valued parameters of the arm TPMs are unknown and belong to a given space. Given a function $f$ defined on the common state space of the arms, the goal is to identify the best arm -- the arm with the largest average value of $f$ evaluated under the arm's stationary distribution -- with the fewest number of samples, subject to an upper bound on the decision's error probability (i.e., the fixed-confidence regime). A lower bound on the growth rate of the expected stopping time is established in the asymptote of a vanishing error probability. Furthermore, a policy for best arm identification is proposed, and its expected stopping time is proved to have an asymptotic growth rate that matches the lower bound. It is demonstrated that tracking the long-term behavior of a certain Markov decision process and its state-action visitation proportions are the key ingredients in analyzing the converse and achievability bounds. It is shown that under every policy, the state-action visitation proportions satisfy a specific approximate flow conservation constraint and that these proportions match the optimal proportions dictated by the lower bound under any asymptotically optimal policy. The prior studies on best arm identification in restless bandits focus on independent observations from the arms, rested Markov arms, and restless Markov arms with known arm TPMs. In contrast, this work is the first to study best arm identification in restless bandits with unknown arm TPMs.

Read more

6/26/2024