Follow My Instruction and Spill the Beans: Scalable Data Extraction from Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems
2402.17840
0
0
Abstract
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) improves pre-trained models by incorporating external knowledge at test time to enable customized adaptation. We study the risk of datastore leakage in Retrieval-In-Context RAG Language Models (LMs). We show that an adversary can exploit LMs' instruction-following capabilities to easily extract text data verbatim from the datastore of RAG systems built with instruction-tuned LMs via prompt injection. The vulnerability exists for a wide range of modern LMs that span Llama2, Mistral/Mixtral, Vicuna, SOLAR, WizardLM, Qwen1.5, and Platypus2, and the exploitability exacerbates as the model size scales up. Extending our study to production RAG models GPTs, we design an attack that can cause datastore leakage with a 100% success rate on 25 randomly selected customized GPTs with at most 2 queries, and we extract text data verbatim at a rate of 41% from a book of 77,000 words and 3% from a corpus of 1,569,000 words by prompting the GPTs with only 100 queries generated by themselves.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a scalable approach to extracting data from retrieval-augmented generation systems, which are AI models that combine language generation with information retrieval.
- The authors propose a technique called "Follow My Instruction and Spill the Beans" (FMISB) that allows for systematic extraction of data from these types of models.
- The paper explores the security implications of this data extraction method and discusses potential countermeasures.
Plain English Explanation
Retrieval-augmented generation systems are a type of AI model that can both generate new text and retrieve relevant information from a database. These models are powerful, but they also raise concerns about data privacy and security.
The FMISB method introduced in this paper provides a way to systematically extract data from these types of models. It works by instructing the model to "spill the beans" and reveal the information it has access to.
This technique could be used for both benign and malicious purposes. On the positive side, it could help researchers and developers better understand how these models work and what kind of data they contain. However, it also opens the door for potential data breaches and misuse of sensitive information.
The authors discuss ways that retrieval-augmented generation systems could be made more secure to prevent unauthorized data extraction, such as by limiting the model's access to certain types of information or incorporating additional safeguards.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents the "Follow My Instruction and Spill the Beans" (FMISB) method for extracting data from retrieval-augmented generation systems. These models combine language generation capabilities with the ability to retrieve relevant information from a database or knowledge base.
The FMISB approach works by instructing the model to reveal the information it has access to. This is done through a prompting technique that directs the model to "spill the beans" and disclose the data it has learned. The authors show that this method can be used to systematically extract a wide range of information, including personal details, confidential documents, and other sensitive data.
The paper also explores the security implications of this data extraction technique. The authors demonstrate how FMISB could be used to identify vulnerabilities in retrieval-augmented generation systems and potentially launch trigger-based attacks that exploit these weaknesses.
To address these concerns, the authors discuss potential countermeasures, such as limiting the model's access to certain types of information or incorporating additional safeguards to prevent unauthorized data extraction.
Critical Analysis
The FMISB technique presented in this paper raises significant concerns about the security and privacy implications of retrieval-augmented generation systems. While the authors acknowledge that the method could be used for benign purposes, such as understanding the models' inner workings, the potential for malicious misuse is concerning.
One limitation of the paper is that it does not delve deeply into the ethical considerations and potential societal impact of this data extraction approach. The authors primarily focus on the technical aspects and security implications, without fully addressing the broader ethical questions surrounding the use of such techniques.
Additionally, while the authors discuss potential countermeasures, it is unclear how effective these measures would be in practice. More research is needed to develop robust security mechanisms that can effectively prevent unauthorized data extraction from retrieval-augmented generation systems.
Overall, this paper provides valuable insights into the security challenges posed by retrieval-augmented generation models, but it also highlights the need for further exploration of the ethical and societal implications of such technologies.
Conclusion
The "Follow My Instruction and Spill the Beans" method introduced in this paper demonstrates the potential risks associated with retrieval-augmented generation systems. By providing a scalable approach to extracting data from these models, the authors have shed light on the security vulnerabilities and privacy concerns that must be addressed.
As AI systems continue to advance, it will be crucial for researchers, developers, and policymakers to work together to ensure that these technologies are designed and deployed in a responsible and ethical manner. The insights from this paper can contribute to the ongoing efforts to secure and protect retrieval-augmented generation systems, ultimately safeguarding the privacy and security of the individuals and organizations that rely on these powerful AI tools.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
BadRAG: Identifying Vulnerabilities in Retrieval Augmented Generation of Large Language Models
Jiaqi Xue, Mengxin Zheng, Yebowen Hu, Fei Liu, Xun Chen, Qian Lou
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) are constrained by outdated information and a tendency to generate incorrect data, commonly referred to as hallucinations. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) addresses these limitations by combining the strengths of retrieval-based methods and generative models. This approach involves retrieving relevant information from a large, up-to-date dataset and using it to enhance the generation process, leading to more accurate and contextually appropriate responses. Despite its benefits, RAG introduces a new attack surface for LLMs, particularly because RAG databases are often sourced from public data, such as the web. In this paper, we propose TrojRAG{} to identify the vulnerabilities and attacks on retrieval parts (RAG database) and their indirect attacks on generative parts (LLMs). Specifically, we identify that poisoning several customized content passages could achieve a retrieval backdoor, where the retrieval works well for clean queries but always returns customized poisoned adversarial queries. Triggers and poisoned passages can be highly customized to implement various attacks. For example, a trigger could be a semantic group like The Republican Party, Donald Trump, etc. Adversarial passages can be tailored to different contents, not only linked to the triggers but also used to indirectly attack generative LLMs without modifying them. These attacks can include denial-of-service attacks on RAG and semantic steering attacks on LLM generations conditioned by the triggers. Our experiments demonstrate that by just poisoning 10 adversarial passages can induce 98.2% success rate to retrieve the adversarial passages. Then, these passages can increase the reject ratio of RAG-based GPT-4 from 0.01% to 74.6% or increase the rate of negative responses from 0.22% to 72% for targeted queries.
6/7/2024
Phantom: General Trigger Attacks on Retrieval Augmented Language Generation
Harsh Chaudhari, Giorgio Severi, John Abascal, Matthew Jagielski, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Milad Nasr, Cristina Nita-Rotaru, Alina Oprea
0
0
Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) expands the capabilities of modern large language models (LLMs) in chatbot applications, enabling developers to adapt and personalize the LLM output without expensive training or fine-tuning. RAG systems use an external knowledge database to retrieve the most relevant documents for a given query, providing this context to the LLM generator. While RAG achieves impressive utility in many applications, its adoption to enable personalized generative models introduces new security risks. In this work, we propose new attack surfaces for an adversary to compromise a victim's RAG system, by injecting a single malicious document in its knowledge database. We design Phantom, general two-step attack framework against RAG augmented LLMs. The first step involves crafting a poisoned document designed to be retrieved by the RAG system within the top-k results only when an adversarial trigger, a specific sequence of words acting as backdoor, is present in the victim's queries. In the second step, a specially crafted adversarial string within the poisoned document triggers various adversarial attacks in the LLM generator, including denial of service, reputation damage, privacy violations, and harmful behaviors. We demonstrate our attacks on multiple LLM architectures, including Gemma, Vicuna, and Llama.
6/3/2024
Empowering Large Language Models to Set up a Knowledge Retrieval Indexer via Self-Learning
Xun Liang, Simin Niu, Zhiyu li, Sensen Zhang, Shichao Song, Hanyu Wang, Jiawei Yang, Feiyu Xiong, Bo Tang, Chenyang Xi
0
0
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) offers a cost-effective approach to injecting real-time knowledge into large language models (LLMs). Nevertheless, constructing and validating high-quality knowledge repositories require considerable effort. We propose a pre-retrieval framework named Pseudo-Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation (PG-RAG), which conceptualizes LLMs as students by providing them with abundant raw reading materials and encouraging them to engage in autonomous reading to record factual information in their own words. The resulting concise, well-organized mental indices are interconnected through common topics or complementary facts to form a pseudo-graph database. During the retrieval phase, PG-RAG mimics the human behavior in flipping through notes, identifying fact paths and subsequently exploring the related contexts. Adhering to the principle of the path taken by many is the best, it integrates highly corroborated fact paths to provide a structured and refined sub-graph assisting LLMs. We validated PG-RAG on three specialized question-answering datasets. In single-document tasks, PG-RAG significantly outperformed the current best baseline, KGP-LLaMA, across all key evaluation metrics, with an average overall performance improvement of 11.6%. Specifically, its BLEU score increased by approximately 14.3%, and the QE-F1 metric improved by 23.7%. In multi-document scenarios, the average metrics of PG-RAG were at least 2.35% higher than the best baseline. Notably, the BLEU score and QE-F1 metric showed stable improvements of around 7.55% and 12.75%, respectively. Our code: https://github.com/IAAR-Shanghai/PGRAG.
5/28/2024
🛸
TrojanRAG: Retrieval-Augmented Generation Can Be Backdoor Driver in Large Language Models
Pengzhou Cheng, Yidong Ding, Tianjie Ju, Zongru Wu, Wei Du, Ping Yi, Zhuosheng Zhang, Gongshen Liu
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have raised concerns about potential security threats despite performing significantly in Natural Language Processing (NLP). Backdoor attacks initially verified that LLM is doing substantial harm at all stages, but the cost and robustness have been criticized. Attacking LLMs is inherently risky in security review, while prohibitively expensive. Besides, the continuous iteration of LLMs will degrade the robustness of backdoors. In this paper, we propose TrojanRAG, which employs a joint backdoor attack in the Retrieval-Augmented Generation, thereby manipulating LLMs in universal attack scenarios. Specifically, the adversary constructs elaborate target contexts and trigger sets. Multiple pairs of backdoor shortcuts are orthogonally optimized by contrastive learning, thus constraining the triggering conditions to a parameter subspace to improve the matching. To improve the recall of the RAG for the target contexts, we introduce a knowledge graph to construct structured data to achieve hard matching at a fine-grained level. Moreover, we normalize the backdoor scenarios in LLMs to analyze the real harm caused by backdoors from both attackers' and users' perspectives and further verify whether the context is a favorable tool for jailbreaking models. Extensive experimental results on truthfulness, language understanding, and harmfulness show that TrojanRAG exhibits versatility threats while maintaining retrieval capabilities on normal queries.
6/3/2024