BadRAG: Identifying Vulnerabilities in Retrieval Augmented Generation of Large Language Models
2406.00083
0
0
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are constrained by outdated information and a tendency to generate incorrect data, commonly referred to as hallucinations. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) addresses these limitations by combining the strengths of retrieval-based methods and generative models. This approach involves retrieving relevant information from a large, up-to-date dataset and using it to enhance the generation process, leading to more accurate and contextually appropriate responses. Despite its benefits, RAG introduces a new attack surface for LLMs, particularly because RAG databases are often sourced from public data, such as the web. In this paper, we propose TrojRAG{} to identify the vulnerabilities and attacks on retrieval parts (RAG database) and their indirect attacks on generative parts (LLMs). Specifically, we identify that poisoning several customized content passages could achieve a retrieval backdoor, where the retrieval works well for clean queries but always returns customized poisoned adversarial queries. Triggers and poisoned passages can be highly customized to implement various attacks. For example, a trigger could be a semantic group like The Republican Party, Donald Trump, etc. Adversarial passages can be tailored to different contents, not only linked to the triggers but also used to indirectly attack generative LLMs without modifying them. These attacks can include denial-of-service attacks on RAG and semantic steering attacks on LLM generations conditioned by the triggers. Our experiments demonstrate that by just poisoning 10 adversarial passages can induce 98.2% success rate to retrieve the adversarial passages. Then, these passages can increase the reject ratio of RAG-based GPT-4 from 0.01% to 74.6% or increase the rate of negative responses from 0.22% to 72% for targeted queries.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper "BadRAG: Identifying Vulnerabilities in Retrieval Augmented Generation of Large Language Models" examines potential vulnerabilities in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems, which combine large language models with information retrieval to generate more accurate and informative text.
- The researchers identify three types of attacks that can exploit vulnerabilities in RAG systems, including Phantom General Trigger Attacks, TrojanRAG, and Unveiling the Duality of RAG.
- The paper also discusses potential defense mechanisms, such as CertifiablyRobustRAG and DuetRAG, that can help mitigate these vulnerabilities.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text on a wide range of topics. However, these models can sometimes produce inaccurate or biased information. To address this, researchers have developed retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems, which combine LLMs with information retrieval to generate more accurate and informative text.
In this paper, the researchers examined potential vulnerabilities in RAG systems that could be exploited by attackers. They identified three main types of attacks:
-
Phantom General Trigger Attacks: Attackers can insert hidden "triggers" into the input text that cause the RAG system to generate specific, malicious outputs, even if the user is unaware of the trigger.
-
TrojanRAG: Attackers can "backdoor" the RAG system by injecting malicious information into the retrieval component, causing the system to generate harmful outputs in certain situations.
-
Unveiling the Duality of RAG: Researchers found that the retrieval and generation components of RAG systems can interact in unexpected ways, leading to vulnerabilities that can be exploited by attackers.
To address these vulnerabilities, the researchers discussed potential defense mechanisms, such as CertifiablyRobustRAG, which aims to make RAG systems more resistant to retrieval-based attacks, and DuetRAG, which proposes a collaborative approach to improve the reliability and security of RAG systems.
Overall, this paper highlights the importance of thoroughly testing and securing RAG systems to ensure they are not vulnerable to malicious attacks that could compromise their accuracy and reliability.
Technical Explanation
The paper "BadRAG: Identifying Vulnerabilities in Retrieval Augmented Generation of Large Language Models" investigates potential security vulnerabilities in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems, which combine large language models (LLMs) with information retrieval to generate more accurate and informative text.
The researchers identify three types of attacks that can exploit vulnerabilities in RAG systems:
-
Phantom General Trigger Attacks: The researchers show that attackers can insert hidden "triggers" into the input text that cause the RAG system to generate specific, malicious outputs, even if the user is unaware of the trigger.
-
TrojanRAG: The researchers demonstrate that attackers can "backdoor" the RAG system by injecting malicious information into the retrieval component, causing the system to generate harmful outputs in certain situations.
-
Unveiling the Duality of RAG: The researchers analyze the interaction between the retrieval and generation components of RAG systems, and find that this duality can lead to vulnerabilities that can be exploited by attackers.
To address these vulnerabilities, the researchers discuss potential defense mechanisms, such as CertifiablyRobustRAG, which aims to make RAG systems more resistant to retrieval-based attacks, and DuetRAG, which proposes a collaborative approach to improve the reliability and security of RAG systems.
The researchers use a combination of theoretical analysis, simulation experiments, and real-world evaluations to demonstrate the existence and impact of these vulnerabilities, as well as the effectiveness of the proposed defense mechanisms.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and technically sound analysis of vulnerabilities in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems, which is an important and timely topic as these systems become more widely adopted. The researchers have identified several credible attack vectors, such as Phantom General Trigger Attacks, TrojanRAG, and the duality of retrieval and generation, that could compromise the reliability and security of RAG systems.
However, the paper does not always provide a clear or intuitive explanation of these complex technical concepts, which may make it difficult for a general audience to fully understand the implications of the research. The use of jargon and lack of concrete examples or analogies could limit the accessibility of the findings.
Additionally, while the paper discusses potential defense mechanisms, such as CertifiablyRobustRAG and DuetRAG, the evaluation of these approaches is still limited. Further research is needed to assess the practical feasibility and effectiveness of these defenses in real-world settings.
It would also be valuable for the paper to address any additional limitations or caveats of the research, such as the specific conditions or assumptions under which the identified vulnerabilities may or may not apply, or potential ways in which the attacks could be further refined or mitigated.
Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the understanding of security issues in RAG systems, but more work is needed to translate the technical findings into actionable insights for practitioners and to explore the full scope of the vulnerabilities and defense strategies.
Conclusion
The paper "BadRAG: Identifying Vulnerabilities in Retrieval Augmented Generation of Large Language Models" examines critical security vulnerabilities in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems, which combine large language models with information retrieval to produce more accurate and informative text.
The researchers identify three main types of attacks that can exploit vulnerabilities in RAG systems: Phantom General Trigger Attacks, TrojanRAG, and the duality of retrieval and generation. These attacks could allow attackers to compromise the reliability and security of RAG systems, potentially leading to the generation of harmful or biased outputs.
To address these vulnerabilities, the researchers discuss potential defense mechanisms, such as CertifiablyRobustRAG and DuetRAG, which aim to make RAG systems more resistant to retrieval-based attacks and improve their overall reliability and security.
The findings of this paper have important implications for the development and deployment of RAG systems, as they highlight the need for thorough security testing and the implementation of robust defense strategies. As these systems become more widely adopted, ensuring their reliability and trustworthiness will be crucial for maintaining the integrity of the information they generate and the trust of their users.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Phantom: General Trigger Attacks on Retrieval Augmented Language Generation
Harsh Chaudhari, Giorgio Severi, John Abascal, Matthew Jagielski, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Milad Nasr, Cristina Nita-Rotaru, Alina Oprea
0
0
Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) expands the capabilities of modern large language models (LLMs) in chatbot applications, enabling developers to adapt and personalize the LLM output without expensive training or fine-tuning. RAG systems use an external knowledge database to retrieve the most relevant documents for a given query, providing this context to the LLM generator. While RAG achieves impressive utility in many applications, its adoption to enable personalized generative models introduces new security risks. In this work, we propose new attack surfaces for an adversary to compromise a victim's RAG system, by injecting a single malicious document in its knowledge database. We design Phantom, general two-step attack framework against RAG augmented LLMs. The first step involves crafting a poisoned document designed to be retrieved by the RAG system within the top-k results only when an adversarial trigger, a specific sequence of words acting as backdoor, is present in the victim's queries. In the second step, a specially crafted adversarial string within the poisoned document triggers various adversarial attacks in the LLM generator, including denial of service, reputation damage, privacy violations, and harmful behaviors. We demonstrate our attacks on multiple LLM architectures, including Gemma, Vicuna, and Llama.
6/3/2024
🛸
TrojanRAG: Retrieval-Augmented Generation Can Be Backdoor Driver in Large Language Models
Pengzhou Cheng, Yidong Ding, Tianjie Ju, Zongru Wu, Wei Du, Ping Yi, Zhuosheng Zhang, Gongshen Liu
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have raised concerns about potential security threats despite performing significantly in Natural Language Processing (NLP). Backdoor attacks initially verified that LLM is doing substantial harm at all stages, but the cost and robustness have been criticized. Attacking LLMs is inherently risky in security review, while prohibitively expensive. Besides, the continuous iteration of LLMs will degrade the robustness of backdoors. In this paper, we propose TrojanRAG, which employs a joint backdoor attack in the Retrieval-Augmented Generation, thereby manipulating LLMs in universal attack scenarios. Specifically, the adversary constructs elaborate target contexts and trigger sets. Multiple pairs of backdoor shortcuts are orthogonally optimized by contrastive learning, thus constraining the triggering conditions to a parameter subspace to improve the matching. To improve the recall of the RAG for the target contexts, we introduce a knowledge graph to construct structured data to achieve hard matching at a fine-grained level. Moreover, we normalize the backdoor scenarios in LLMs to analyze the real harm caused by backdoors from both attackers' and users' perspectives and further verify whether the context is a favorable tool for jailbreaking models. Extensive experimental results on truthfulness, language understanding, and harmfulness show that TrojanRAG exhibits versatility threats while maintaining retrieval capabilities on normal queries.
6/3/2024
Follow My Instruction and Spill the Beans: Scalable Data Extraction from Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems
Zhenting Qi, Hanlin Zhang, Eric Xing, Sham Kakade, Himabindu Lakkaraju
0
0
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) improves pre-trained models by incorporating external knowledge at test time to enable customized adaptation. We study the risk of datastore leakage in Retrieval-In-Context RAG Language Models (LMs). We show that an adversary can exploit LMs' instruction-following capabilities to easily extract text data verbatim from the datastore of RAG systems built with instruction-tuned LMs via prompt injection. The vulnerability exists for a wide range of modern LMs that span Llama2, Mistral/Mixtral, Vicuna, SOLAR, WizardLM, Qwen1.5, and Platypus2, and the exploitability exacerbates as the model size scales up. Extending our study to production RAG models GPTs, we design an attack that can cause datastore leakage with a 100% success rate on 25 randomly selected customized GPTs with at most 2 queries, and we extract text data verbatim at a rate of 41% from a book of 77,000 words and 3% from a corpus of 1,569,000 words by prompting the GPTs with only 100 queries generated by themselves.
6/24/2024
🛸
C-RAG: Certified Generation Risks for Retrieval-Augmented Language Models
Mintong Kang, Nezihe Merve Gurel, Ning Yu, Dawn Song, Bo Li
0
0
Despite the impressive capabilities of large language models (LLMs) across diverse applications, they still suffer from trustworthiness issues, such as hallucinations and misalignments. Retrieval-augmented language models (RAG) have been proposed to enhance the credibility of generations by grounding external knowledge, but the theoretical understandings of their generation risks remains unexplored. In this paper, we answer: 1) whether RAG can indeed lead to low generation risks, 2) how to provide provable guarantees on the generation risks of RAG and vanilla LLMs, and 3) what sufficient conditions enable RAG models to reduce generation risks. We propose C-RAG, the first framework to certify generation risks for RAG models. Specifically, we provide conformal risk analysis for RAG models and certify an upper confidence bound of generation risks, which we refer to as conformal generation risk. We also provide theoretical guarantees on conformal generation risks for general bounded risk functions under test distribution shifts. We prove that RAG achieves a lower conformal generation risk than that of a single LLM when the quality of the retrieval model and transformer is non-trivial. Our intensive empirical results demonstrate the soundness and tightness of our conformal generation risk guarantees across four widely-used NLP datasets on four state-of-the-art retrieval models.
6/5/2024