Fractional Naive Bayes (FNB): non-convex optimization for a parsimonious weighted selective naive Bayes classifier

Read original: arXiv:2409.11100 - Published 9/18/2024 by Carine Hue, Marc Boull'e
Total Score

0

Fractional Naive Bayes (FNB): non-convex optimization for a parsimonious weighted selective naive Bayes classifier

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Fractional Naive Bayes (FNB) is a non-convex optimization approach for a parsimonious weighted selective naive Bayes classifier.
  • It aims to achieve a sparse and accurate model by selectively weighting the features used in the naive Bayes classifier.
  • The key ideas are to use a non-convex fractional regularizer to induce sparsity, and an efficient iterative algorithm to optimize the non-convex objective.

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a new machine learning algorithm called Fractional Naive Bayes (FNB) for classification tasks. Naive Bayes is a popular and simple classifier, but it can sometimes use too many features, making the model complex and harder to interpret.

FNB tries to address this by selectively weighting the features used in the naive Bayes classifier. This means it will focus on the most important features and ignore less relevant ones, resulting in a simpler and more efficient model. To do this, FNB uses a special mathematical technique called non-convex optimization. This allows it to find an optimal set of feature weights in a clever way, without getting stuck in local minima.

The key innovations in FNB are:

  1. Using a non-convex fractional regularizer to encourage the model to use only the most important features and discard the rest.
  2. Developing an efficient iterative algorithm to optimize this non-convex objective function.

By combining these two ideas, FNB is able to learn sparse and accurate classification models, which are both high-performing and easy to understand.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces Fractional Naive Bayes (FNB), a new approach for selective feature weighting in the naive Bayes classifier. Naive Bayes is a popular and simple classification algorithm, but it can suffer from overfitting when too many features are used.

FNB addresses this by selectively weighting the features, effectively pruning away less important ones. This is achieved through the use of a non-convex fractional regularizer, which encourages sparsity in the feature weights. Specifically, the authors propose minimizing an objective function that consists of the standard naive Bayes log-likelihood combined with a non-convex fractional penalty term.

To optimize this non-convex objective, the authors develop an efficient iterative algorithm. This algorithm alternates between updating the feature weights and the regularization parameter, converging to a local optimum. The authors prove that this algorithm has guaranteed convergence properties.

Experiments on several benchmark datasets show that FNB is able to learn sparse and accurate classification models, outperforming standard naive Bayes and other feature selection methods. The interpretability of the resulting models is also highlighted as a key advantage of the FNB approach.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and interesting approach to feature selection for the naive Bayes classifier. The key innovations, such as the use of a non-convex fractional regularizer and the iterative optimization algorithm, are technically sound and well-explained.

However, the non-convex optimization aspect of FNB could be a potential limitation. While the authors prove convergence guarantees, the algorithm may still be sensitive to initialization and could get stuck in local optima, especially for high-dimensional datasets. The authors acknowledge this and suggest exploring alternative optimization techniques in future work.

Additionally, the experimental evaluation, while comprehensive, is limited to relatively small-scale datasets. It would be valuable to see how FNB scales and performs on larger, more complex classification problems, especially in real-world scenarios.

Finally, the interpretability claims of FNB, while intriguing, could be further explored. The authors could delve deeper into how the sparse feature weights provided by FNB can be used to gain meaningful insights about the underlying data and decision-making process.

Conclusion

The Fractional Naive Bayes (FNB) paper presents a novel non-convex optimization approach for selective feature weighting in the naive Bayes classifier. By introducing a non-convex fractional regularizer and an efficient iterative algorithm, FNB is able to learn sparse and accurate classification models that are also more interpretable than standard naive Bayes.

The key contributions of this work are the innovative use of non-convex optimization techniques for feature selection in naive Bayes, as well as the strong experimental results demonstrating the effectiveness of the FNB approach. While the non-convex optimization aspect and the limited experimental evaluation are potential areas for further research, the FNB algorithm represents an interesting and promising development in the field of supervised classification.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Fractional Naive Bayes (FNB): non-convex optimization for a parsimonious weighted selective naive Bayes classifier
Total Score

0

New!Fractional Naive Bayes (FNB): non-convex optimization for a parsimonious weighted selective naive Bayes classifier

Carine Hue, Marc Boull'e

We study supervised classification for datasets with a very large number of input variables. The naive Bayes classifier is attractive for its simplicity, scalability and effectiveness in many real data applications. When the strong naive Bayes assumption of conditional independence of the input variables given the target variable is not valid, variable selection and model averaging are two common ways to improve the performance. In the case of the naive Bayes classifier, the resulting weighting scheme on the models reduces to a weighting scheme on the variables. Here we focus on direct estimation of variable weights in such a weighted naive Bayes classifier. We propose a sparse regularization of the model log-likelihood, which takes into account prior penalization costs related to each input variable. Compared to averaging based classifiers used up until now, our main goal is to obtain parsimonious robust models with less variables and equivalent performance. The direct estimation of the variable weights amounts to a non-convex optimization problem for which we propose and compare several two-stage algorithms. First, the criterion obtained by convex relaxation is minimized using several variants of standard gradient methods. Then, the initial non-convex optimization problem is solved using local optimization methods initialized with the result of the first stage. The various proposed algorithms result in optimization-based weighted naive Bayes classifiers, that are evaluated on benchmark datasets and positioned w.r.t. to a reference averaging-based classifier.

Read more

9/18/2024

Generalized Naive Bayes
Total Score

0

Generalized Naive Bayes

Edith Alice Kov'acs, Anna Orsz'ag, D'aniel Pfeifer, Andr'as Bencz'ur

In this paper we introduce the so-called Generalized Naive Bayes structure as an extension of the Naive Bayes structure. We give a new greedy algorithm that finds a good fitting Generalized Naive Bayes (GNB) probability distribution. We prove that this fits the data at least as well as the probability distribution determined by the classical Naive Bayes (NB). Then, under a not very restrictive condition, we give a second algorithm for which we can prove that it finds the optimal GNB probability distribution, i.e. best fitting structure in the sense of KL divergence. Both algorithms are constructed to maximize the information content and aim to minimize redundancy. Based on these algorithms, new methods for feature selection are introduced. We discuss the similarities and differences to other related algorithms in terms of structure, methodology, and complexity. Experimental results show, that the algorithms introduced outperform the related algorithms in many cases.

Read more

8/29/2024

Optimal Projections for Classification with Naive Bayes
Total Score

0

Optimal Projections for Classification with Naive Bayes

David P. Hofmeyr, Francois Kamper, Michail M. Melonas

In the Naive Bayes classification model the class conditional densities are estimated as the products of their marginal densities along the cardinal basis directions. We study the problem of obtaining an alternative basis for this factorisation with the objective of enhancing the discriminatory power of the associated classification model. We formulate the problem as a projection pursuit to find the optimal linear projection on which to perform classification. Optimality is determined based on the multinomial likelihood within which probabilities are estimated using the Naive Bayes factorisation of the projected data. Projection pursuit offers the added benefits of dimension reduction and visualisation. We discuss an intuitive connection with class conditional independent components analysis, and show how this is realised visually in practical applications. The performance of the resulting classification models is investigated using a large collection of (162) publicly available benchmark data sets and in comparison with relevant alternatives. We find that the proposed approach substantially outperforms other popular probabilistic discriminant analysis models and is highly competitive with Support Vector Machines.

Read more

9/10/2024

🔄

Total Score

0

Aggregation of expert advice, revisited

Aryeh Kontorovich

We revisit the classic problem of aggregating binary advice from conditionally independent experts, also known as the Naive Bayes setting. Our quantity of interest is the error probability of the optimal decision rule. In the case of symmetric errors (sensitivity = specificity), reasonably tight bounds on the optimal error probability are known. In the general asymmetric case, we are not aware of any nontrivial estimates on this quantity. Our contribution consists of sharp upper and lower bounds on the optimal error probability in the general case, which recover and sharpen the best known results in the symmetric special case. Since this turns out to be equivalent to estimating the total variation distance between two product distributions, our results also have bearing on this important and challenging problem.

Read more

9/17/2024