A Framework for Exploring the Consequences of AI-Mediated Enterprise Knowledge Access and Identifying Risks to Workers

Read original: arXiv:2312.10076 - Published 5/1/2024 by Anna Gausen, Bhaskar Mitra, Si^an Lindley
Total Score

0

🚀

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a framework for exploring the consequences of AI-mediated access to enterprise knowledge and identifying potential risks to workers.
  • The research aims to understand how AI systems that provide knowledge access and decision support within organizations might impact workers and their roles.
  • The framework considers factors like information asymmetry, deskilling, and displacement of human expertise that could emerge from AI-driven knowledge access.

Plain English Explanation

The paper explores how AI systems that give workers access to enterprise knowledge and provide decision-making assistance could affect those workers and their jobs. It develops a framework to understand the potential consequences, both positive and negative.

One key issue the framework considers is information asymmetry - how AI might give some workers more knowledge and insights than others, creating an imbalance. This could empower certain workers but also lead to concerns around fairness and transparency.

The framework also looks at the risk of deskilling, where AI takes over tasks that previously required specialized human expertise. This could make some workers' skills less valuable and erode their autonomy. There are also worries about the displacement of human expertise, as AI becomes better able to handle complex knowledge-based work.

Overall, the goal is to get ahead of these emerging issues and identify ways to harness the benefits of AI-powered knowledge access while mitigating the risks to workers. The framework provides a structure for organizations to proactively consider and address these concerns.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a conceptual framework for exploring the consequences of AI-mediated enterprise knowledge access and identifying risks to workers. The framework considers three key issues:

  1. Information Asymmetry: How AI systems that provide selective access to enterprise knowledge and insights could create imbalances in information and decision-making power between workers.

  2. Deskilling: The risk that AI-driven knowledge access and decision support could diminish the need for specialized human expertise, reducing worker autonomy and the value of their skills.

  3. Displacement of Human Expertise: As AI becomes more capable of handling complex knowledge work, there are concerns about the wholesale replacement of human expertise with algorithmic decision-making.

The framework draws on prior research around responsible AI development, harm mitigation, and AI accountability. It provides a structured way for organizations to anticipate and address the potential workforce impacts of AI-driven knowledge collapse.

Critical Analysis

The framework presented in the paper offers a valuable starting point for organizations to proactively consider the worker-centric implications of AI-powered knowledge access. However, the authors acknowledge that empirical validation and further refinement of the framework will be needed.

One potential limitation is the broad scope of the framework - while it identifies key risk areas, more granular analysis may be required to fully understand the nuances and tradeoffs within specific organizational contexts. The paper also does not delve deeply into potential mitigation strategies beyond the general need for transparency and worker involvement.

Additional research could explore how factors like job role, industry, and organizational culture might shape the manifestation and severity of the identified risks. There may also be value in examining how workers themselves perceive and respond to the introduction of AI-mediated knowledge systems.

Overall, this paper lays important groundwork for addressing a critical issue at the intersection of AI, enterprise knowledge management, and the future of work. Continued investigation and collaborative efforts between researchers, policymakers, and industry stakeholders will be essential to turning the framework's insights into practical solutions.

Conclusion

This paper presents a conceptual framework for exploring the potential consequences of AI-mediated access to enterprise knowledge, with a focus on identifying risks to workers. The framework addresses key issues around information asymmetry, deskilling, and the displacement of human expertise that could emerge as AI becomes more deeply integrated into organizational knowledge management and decision-making processes.

By providing a structured approach to anticipating and addressing these workforce-centric concerns, the framework aims to help organizations harness the benefits of AI-powered knowledge access while mitigating potential negative impacts on workers. While further empirical validation and refinement will be needed, this research lays important groundwork for ensuring that the transformation of enterprise knowledge systems driven by AI advances in an equitable and responsible manner.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🚀

Total Score

0

A Framework for Exploring the Consequences of AI-Mediated Enterprise Knowledge Access and Identifying Risks to Workers

Anna Gausen, Bhaskar Mitra, Si^an Lindley

Organisations generate vast amounts of information, which has resulted in a long-term research effort into knowledge access systems for enterprise settings. Recent developments in artificial intelligence, in relation to large language models, are poised to have significant impact on knowledge access. This has the potential to shape the workplace and knowledge in new and unanticipated ways. Many risks can arise from the deployment of these types of AI systems, due to interactions between the technical system and organisational power dynamics. This paper presents the Consequence-Mechanism-Risk framework to identify risks to workers from AI-mediated enterprise knowledge access systems. We have drawn on wide-ranging literature detailing risks to workers, and categorised risks as being to worker value, power, and wellbeing. The contribution of our framework is to additionally consider (i) the consequences of these systems that are of moral import: commodification, appropriation, concentration of power, and marginalisation, and (ii) the mechanisms, which represent how these consequences may take effect in the system. The mechanisms are a means of contextualising risk within specific system processes, which is critical for mitigation. This framework is aimed at helping practitioners involved in the design and deployment of AI-mediated knowledge access systems to consider the risks introduced to workers, identify the precise system mechanisms that introduce those risks and begin to approach mitigation. Future work could apply this framework to other technological systems to promote the protection of workers and other groups.

Read more

5/1/2024

🚀

Total Score

0

Beyond Accidents and Misuse: Decoding the Structural Risk Dynamics of Artificial Intelligence

Kyle A Kilian

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) across contemporary industries is not just a technological upgrade but a transformation with profound structural implications. This paper explores the concept of structural risks associated with the rapid integration of advanced AI systems across social, economic, and political systems. This framework challenges the conventional perspectives that primarily focus on direct AI threats such as accidents and misuse and suggests that these more proximate risks are interconnected and influenced by a larger sociotechnical system. By analyzing the interactions between technological advancements and social dynamics, this study isolates three primary categories of structural risk: antecedent structural causes, antecedent system causes, and deleterious feedback loops. We present a comprehensive framework to understand the causal chains that drive these risks, highlighting the interdependence between structural forces and the more proximate risks of misuse and system failures. The paper articulates how unchecked AI advancement can reshape power dynamics, trust, and incentive structures, leading to profound and often unpredictable shifts. We introduce a methodological research agenda for mapping, simulating, and gaming these dynamics aimed at preparing policymakers and national security officials for the challenges posed by next-generation AI technologies. The paper concludes with policy recommendations.

Read more

8/19/2024

👁️

Total Score

0

Approaching Emergent Risks: An Exploratory Study into Artificial Intelligence Risk Management within Financial Organisations

Finlay McGee

Globally, artificial intelligence (AI) implementation is growing, holding the capability to fundamentally alter organisational processes and decision making. Simultaneously, this brings a multitude of emergent risks to organisations, exposing vulnerabilities in their extant risk management frameworks. This necessitates a greater understanding of how organisations can position themselves in response. This issue is particularly pertinent within the financial sector with relatively mature AI applications matched with severe societal repercussions of potential risk events. Despite this, academic risk management literature is trailing behind the speed of AI implementation. Adopting a management perspective, this study aims to contribute to the understanding of AI risk management in organisations through an exploratory empirical investigation into these practices. In-depth insights are gained through interviews with nine practitioners from different organisations within the UK financial sector. Through examining areas of organisational convergence and divergence, the findings of this study unearth levels of risk management framework readiness and prevailing approaches to risk management at both a processual and organisational level. Whilst enhancing the developing literature concerning AI risk management within organisations, the study simultaneously offers a practical contribution, providing key areas of guidance for practitioners in the operational development of AI risk management frameworks.

Read more

4/10/2024

🤖

Total Score

0

A Conceptual Framework for Ethical Evaluation of Machine Learning Systems

Neha R. Gupta, Jessica Hullman, Hari Subramonyam

Research in Responsible AI has developed a range of principles and practices to ensure that machine learning systems are used in a manner that is ethical and aligned with human values. However, a critical yet often neglected aspect of ethical ML is the ethical implications that appear when designing evaluations of ML systems. For instance, teams may have to balance a trade-off between highly informative tests to ensure downstream product safety, with potential fairness harms inherent to the implemented testing procedures. We conceptualize ethics-related concerns in standard ML evaluation techniques. Specifically, we present a utility framework, characterizing the key trade-off in ethical evaluation as balancing information gain against potential ethical harms. The framework is then a tool for characterizing challenges teams face, and systematically disentangling competing considerations that teams seek to balance. Differentiating between different types of issues encountered in evaluation allows us to highlight best practices from analogous domains, such as clinical trials and automotive crash testing, which navigate these issues in ways that can offer inspiration to improve evaluation processes in ML. Our analysis underscores the critical need for development teams to deliberately assess and manage ethical complexities that arise during the evaluation of ML systems, and for the industry to move towards designing institutional policies to support ethical evaluations.

Read more

8/21/2024