From Data to Insights: A Covariate Analysis of the IARPA BRIAR Dataset for Multimodal Biometric Recognition Algorithms at Altitude and Range

Read original: arXiv:2409.01514 - Published 9/4/2024 by David S. Bolme, Deniz Aykac, Ryan Shivers, Joel Brogan, Nell Barber, Bob Zhang, Laura Davies, David Cornett III

📊

Overview

Provides LaTeX author guidelines for the IJCB 2024 proceedings, based on CVPR guidelines
Covers language requirements, formatting instructions, figure and table guidelines, referencing, and submission process
Aims to help authors prepare their papers for publication in the IJCB 2024 proceedings

Plain English Explanation

This document outlines the guidelines and instructions for authors submitting papers to the IJCB 2024 proceedings. It is based on the guidelines used for the CVPR conference, and provides details on the expected language, formatting, figures, tables, references, and the overall submission process.

The guidelines are designed to ensure a consistent look and feel across all the papers published in the IJCB 2024 proceedings. By following these instructions, authors can properly format their work and increase the chances of their paper being accepted for publication.

Some key points include:

Following these guidelines will help authors ensure their work is presented in a clear and consistent manner, making it easier for reviewers and readers to engage with the research.

Technical Explanation

The document outlines the LaTeX author guidelines for the IJCB 2024 proceedings, which are based on the CVPR conference guidelines. It covers several key aspects:

Language: The paper must be written in English, and the authors are responsible for ensuring proper grammar and spelling.
Formatting: There are specific requirements for the paper format, including page size, margins, font, spacing, and sectioning. Authors must use the provided LaTeX template to ensure correct formatting.
Figures and Tables: Guidelines are provided for the inclusion of figures and tables, including size, placement, and captions. Authors must ensure all figures and tables are properly formatted and referenced in the text.
References: The paper must include a properly formatted reference list following the IJCB 2024 reference style. In-text citations must also adhere to the specified format.
Submission Process: The final paper must be submitted through the IJCB 2024 conference management system, following the provided instructions and deadlines.

By adhering to these guidelines, authors can ensure their work is presented in a consistent and professional manner, facilitating the review and publication process for the IJCB 2024 proceedings.

Critical Analysis

The guidelines provided in this document are comprehensive and well-structured, covering the key aspects necessary for authors to prepare their papers for the IJCB 2024 proceedings. The guidelines are based on the well-established CVPR conference format, which helps maintain a consistent style and quality across the published papers.

One potential limitation is the reliance on LaTeX, which may be less familiar to some authors. While the provided template helps mitigate this, authors without prior LaTeX experience may need to invest additional time and effort to properly format their work.

Additionally, the guidelines do not explicitly address issues of inclusivity, diversity, or potential biases in the research content or presentation. As the field of computer vision continues to evolve, it may be beneficial for future guidelines to incorporate considerations around ethical and responsible research practices.

Overall, the IJCB 2024 author guidelines provide a solid foundation for authors to prepare their submissions, but there may be opportunities to further refine and enhance the guidelines to address emerging concerns in the research community.

Conclusion

The IJCB 2024 LaTeX author guidelines provide a comprehensive set of instructions to help authors prepare their papers for publication in the conference proceedings. By following these guidelines, authors can ensure their work is presented in a consistent and professional manner, facilitating the review and publication process.

The guidelines cover key aspects such as language, formatting, figures, tables, references, and the submission process. By adhering to these guidelines, authors can increase the chances of their work being accepted and published in the IJCB 2024 proceedings.

As the field of computer vision continues to evolve, it may be valuable for the guidelines to incorporate additional considerations around inclusive and responsible research practices. However, the current guidelines provide a strong foundation for authors to successfully navigate the IJCB 2024 publication process.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📊

From Data to Insights: A Covariate Analysis of the IARPA BRIAR Dataset for Multimodal Biometric Recognition Algorithms at Altitude and Range

David S. Bolme, Deniz Aykac, Ryan Shivers, Joel Brogan, Nell Barber, Bob Zhang, Laura Davies, David Cornett III

This paper examines covariate effects on fused whole body biometrics performance in the IARPA BRIAR dataset, specifically focusing on UAV platforms, elevated positions, and distances up to 1000 meters. The dataset includes outdoor videos compared with indoor images and controlled gait recordings. Normalized raw fusion scores relate directly to predicted false accept rates (FAR), offering an intuitive means for interpreting model results. A linear model is developed to predict biometric algorithm scores, analyzing their performance to identify the most influential covariates on accuracy at altitude and range. Weather factors like temperature, wind speed, solar loading, and turbulence are also investigated in this analysis. The study found that resolution and camera distance best predicted accuracy and findings can guide future research and development efforts in long-range/elevated/UAV biometrics and support the creation of more reliable and robust systems for national security and other critical domains.

9/4/2024

Long-Range Biometric Identification in Real World Scenarios: A Comprehensive Evaluation Framework Based on Missions

Deniz Aykac, Joel Brogan, Nell Barber, Ryan Shivers, Bob Zhang, Dallas Sacca, Ryan Tipton, Gavin Jager, Austin Garret, Matthew Love, Jim Goddard, David Cornett III, David S. Bolme

The considerable body of data available for evaluating biometric recognition systems in Research and Development (R&D) environments has contributed to the increasingly common problem of target performance mismatch. Biometric algorithms are frequently tested against data that may not reflect the real world applications they target. From a Testing and Evaluation (T&E) standpoint, this domain mismatch causes difficulty assessing when improvements in State-of-the-Art (SOTA) research actually translate to improved applied outcomes. This problem can be addressed with thoughtful preparation of data and experimental methods to reflect specific use-cases and scenarios. To that end, this paper evaluates research solutions for identifying individuals at ranges and altitudes, which could support various application areas such as counterterrorism, protection of critical infrastructure facilities, military force protection, and border security. We address challenges including image quality issues and reliance on face recognition as the sole biometric modality. By fusing face and body features, we propose developing robust biometric systems for effective long-range identification from both the ground and steep pitch angles. Preliminary results show promising progress in whole-body recognition. This paper presents these early findings and discusses potential future directions for advancing long-range biometric identification systems based on mission-driven metrics.

9/4/2024

Enhancing Worldwide Image Geolocation by Ensembling Satellite-Based Ground-Level Attribute Predictors

Michael J. Bianco, David Eigen, Michael Gormish

Geolocating images of a ground-level scene entails estimating the location on Earth where the picture was taken, in absence of GPS or other location metadata. Typically, methods are evaluated by measuring the Great Circle Distance (GCD) between a predicted location and ground truth. However, this measurement is limited because it only evaluates a single point, not estimates of regions or score heatmaps. This is especially important in applications to rural, wilderness and under-sampled areas, where finding the exact location may not be possible, and when used in aggregate systems that progressively narrow down locations. In this paper, we introduce a novel metric, Recall vs Area (RvA), which measures the accuracy of estimated distributions of locations. RvA treats image geolocation results similarly to document retrieval, measuring recall as a function of area: For a ranked list of (possibly non-contiguous) predicted regions, we measure the accumulated area required for the region to contain the ground truth coordinate. This produces a curve similar to a precision-recall curve, where precision is replaced by square kilometers area, allowing evaluation of performance for different downstream search area budgets. Following directly from this view of the problem, we then examine a simple ensembling approach to global-scale image geolocation, which incorporates information from multiple sources to help address domain shift, and can readily incorporate multiple models, attribute predictors, and data sources. We study its effectiveness by combining the geolocation models GeoEstimation and the current SOTA GeoCLIP, with attribute predictors based on ORNL LandScan and ESA-CCI Land Cover. We find significant improvements in image geolocation for areas that are under-represented in the training set, particularly non-urban areas, on both Im2GPS3k and Street View images.

7/22/2024

EVD4UAV: An Altitude-Sensitive Benchmark to Evade Vehicle Detection in UAV

Huiming Sun, Jiacheng Guo, Zibo Meng, Tianyun Zhang, Jianwu Fang, Yuewei Lin, Hongkai Yu

Vehicle detection in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) captured images has wide applications in aerial photography and remote sensing. There are many public benchmark datasets proposed for the vehicle detection and tracking in UAV images. Recent studies show that adding an adversarial patch on objects can fool the well-trained deep neural networks based object detectors, posing security concerns to the downstream tasks. However, the current public UAV datasets might ignore the diverse altitudes, vehicle attributes, fine-grained instance-level annotation in mostly side view with blurred vehicle roof, so none of them is good to study the adversarial patch based vehicle detection attack problem. In this paper, we propose a new dataset named EVD4UAV as an altitude-sensitive benchmark to evade vehicle detection in UAV with 6,284 images and 90,886 fine-grained annotated vehicles. The EVD4UAV dataset has diverse altitudes (50m, 70m, 90m), vehicle attributes (color, type), fine-grained annotation (horizontal and rotated bounding boxes, instance-level mask) in top view with clear vehicle roof. One white-box and two black-box patch based attack methods are implemented to attack three classic deep neural networks based object detectors on EVD4UAV. The experimental results show that these representative attack methods could not achieve the robust altitude-insensitive attack performance.

7/24/2024