From the Fair Distribution of Predictions to the Fair Distribution of Social Goods: Evaluating the Impact of Fair Machine Learning on Long-Term Unemployment
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the impact of fair machine learning (ML) algorithms on long-term unemployment, examining the potential for fair ML to affect the distribution of social goods rather than just predictions.
- The researchers investigate the relationship between retrospective fairness (ensuring fair model outputs) and prospective fairness (ensuring fair outcomes in the real world) in the context of long-term unemployment.
- The paper highlights the importance of considering the downstream societal impacts of fair ML systems beyond just the model predictions themselves.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at how using "fair" machine learning (ML) algorithms can affect long-term unemployment, rather than just the fairness of the model's predictions. Typically, fair ML focuses on ensuring the model's outputs are fair, like making sure the model doesn't discriminate. But this paper explores how that "retrospective fairness" can translate to "prospective fairness" - meaning how the real-world outcomes end up being distributed.
The researchers are interested in understanding the relationship between these two types of fairness, and how implementing fair ML might impact things like who gets hired and who stays unemployed long-term. The key idea is that we need to look beyond just the fairness of the model's predictions, and also consider the broader societal impacts of using these fair ML systems. Just because a model is "fair" doesn't mean the ultimate outcomes will be fair as well.
Technical Explanation
The paper examines the relationship between retrospective fairness (ensuring fair model outputs) and prospective fairness (ensuring fair outcomes in the real world) in the context of long-term unemployment. The researchers investigate how implementing fair ML algorithms can affect the distribution of social goods, rather than just the fairness of the model's predictions.
The paper highlights the importance of considering the downstream societal impacts of fair ML systems, beyond just the model predictions themselves. This includes examining how fair hiring algorithms can affect long-term unemployment rates and the distribution of employment opportunities.
The authors also discuss the potential for fairness considerations in ML model configuration to have broader societal implications, rather than just improving the fairness of the models.
Critical Analysis
The paper raises important points about the need to look beyond just the fairness of model predictions and consider the real-world societal impacts of fair ML systems. However, the analysis is primarily conceptual, and the authors acknowledge the need for further empirical research to better understand the complex relationships between fair ML and long-term unemployment.
One potential limitation is that the paper does not delve deeply into the specific mechanisms by which fair ML could impact long-term unemployment, such as the potential for fair hiring algorithms to change employer behavior or alter the job search process for different demographic groups. Exploring these causal pathways in more detail could strengthen the theoretical framework.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential unintended consequences or trade-offs that may arise from implementing fair ML systems, such as potential impacts on overall employment levels or economic productivity. Considering these broader societal implications would be an important area for future research.
Conclusion
This paper highlights the importance of moving beyond a narrow focus on the fairness of model predictions in fair ML research, and instead considering the broader societal impacts of these systems. The authors make a compelling case for the need to examine the relationship between retrospective fairness and prospective fairness, particularly in the context of long-term unemployment.
While the analysis is largely conceptual, the paper lays the groundwork for future empirical studies that can better elucidate the complex dynamics between fair ML and the distribution of social goods. Ultimately, this research underscores the need for a more holistic, interdisciplinary approach to understanding and evaluating the real-world consequences of fair machine learning.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
From the Fair Distribution of Predictions to the Fair Distribution of Social Goods: Evaluating the Impact of Fair Machine Learning on Long-Term Unemployment
Sebastian Zezulka, Konstantin Genin
Deploying an algorithmically informed policy is a significant intervention in society. Prominent methods for algorithmic fairness focus on the distribution of predictions at the time of training, rather than the distribution of social goods that arises after deploying the algorithm in a specific social context. However, requiring a fair distribution of predictions may undermine efforts at establishing a fair distribution of social goods. First, we argue that addressing this problem requires a notion of prospective fairness that anticipates the change in the distribution of social goods after deployment. Second, we provide formal conditions under which this change is identified from pre-deployment data. That requires accounting for different kinds of performative effects. Here, we focus on the way predictions change policy decisions and, consequently, the causally downstream distribution of social goods. Throughout, we are guided by an application from public administration: the use of algorithms to predict who among the recently unemployed will remain unemployed in the long term and to target them with labor market programs. Third, using administrative data from the Swiss public employment service, we simulate how such algorithmically informed policies would affect gender inequalities in long-term unemployment. When risk predictions are required to be fair according to statistical parity and equality of opportunity, targeting decisions are less effective, undermining efforts to both lower overall levels of long-term unemployment and to close the gender gap in long-term unemployment.
Read more6/18/2024
0
Supervised Algorithmic Fairness in Distribution Shifts: A Survey
Minglai Shao, Dong Li, Chen Zhao, Xintao Wu, Yujie Lin, Qin Tian
Supervised fairness-aware machine learning under distribution shifts is an emerging field that addresses the challenge of maintaining equitable and unbiased predictions when faced with changes in data distributions from source to target domains. In real-world applications, machine learning models are often trained on a specific dataset but deployed in environments where the data distribution may shift over time due to various factors. This shift can lead to unfair predictions, disproportionately affecting certain groups characterized by sensitive attributes, such as race and gender. In this survey, we provide a summary of various types of distribution shifts and comprehensively investigate existing methods based on these shifts, highlighting six commonly used approaches in the literature. Additionally, this survey lists publicly available datasets and evaluation metrics for empirical studies. We further explore the interconnection with related research fields, discuss the significant challenges, and identify potential directions for future studies.
Read more5/7/2024
0
Long-Term Fairness Inquiries and Pursuits in Machine Learning: A Survey of Notions, Methods, and Challenges
Usman Gohar, Zeyu Tang, Jialu Wang, Kun Zhang, Peter L. Spirtes, Yang Liu, Lu Cheng
The widespread integration of Machine Learning systems in daily life, particularly in high-stakes domains, has raised concerns about the fairness implications. While prior works have investigated static fairness measures, recent studies reveal that automated decision-making has long-term implications and that off-the-shelf fairness approaches may not serve the purpose of achieving long-term fairness. Additionally, the existence of feedback loops and the interaction between models and the environment introduces additional complexities that may deviate from the initial fairness goals. In this survey, we review existing literature on long-term fairness from different perspectives and present a taxonomy for long-term fairness studies. We highlight key challenges and consider future research directions, analyzing both current issues and potential further explorations.
Read more6/12/2024
➖
0
Fairness and Bias in Algorithmic Hiring: a Multidisciplinary Survey
Alessandro Fabris, Nina Baranowska, Matthew J. Dennis, David Graus, Philipp Hacker, Jorge Saldivar, Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius, Asia J. Biega
Employers are adopting algorithmic hiring technology throughout the recruitment pipeline. Algorithmic fairness is especially applicable in this domain due to its high stakes and structural inequalities. Unfortunately, most work in this space provides partial treatment, often constrained by two competing narratives, optimistically focused on replacing biased recruiter decisions or pessimistically pointing to the automation of discrimination. Whether, and more importantly what types of, algorithmic hiring can be less biased and more beneficial to society than low-tech alternatives currently remains unanswered, to the detriment of trustworthiness. This multidisciplinary survey caters to practitioners and researchers with a balanced and integrated coverage of systems, biases, measures, mitigation strategies, datasets, and legal aspects of algorithmic hiring and fairness. Our work supports a contextualized understanding and governance of this technology by highlighting current opportunities and limitations, providing recommendations for future work to ensure shared benefits for all stakeholders.
Read more4/9/2024