What Makes a Language Easy to Deep-Learn?
2302.12239
0
0
💬
Abstract
Deep neural networks drive the success of natural language processing. A fundamental property of language is its compositional structure, allowing humans to systematically produce forms for new meanings. For humans, languages with more compositional and transparent structures are typically easier to learn than those with opaque and irregular structures. However, this learnability advantage has not yet been shown for deep neural networks, limiting their use as models for human language learning. Here, we directly test how neural networks compare to humans in learning and generalizing different languages that vary in their degree of compositional structure. We evaluate the memorization and generalization capabilities of a large language model and recurrent neural networks, and show that both deep neural networks exhibit a learnability advantage for more structured linguistic input: neural networks exposed to more compositional languages show more systematic generalization, greater agreement between different agents, and greater similarity to human learners.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Deep neural networks have driven significant advances in natural language processing.
- Language has a fundamental property of compositional structure, allowing humans to systematically produce new forms and meanings.
- Languages with more compositional and transparent structures are typically easier for humans to learn than those with opaque and irregular structures.
- It's unclear if this learnability advantage extends to deep neural networks, which could limit their use as models for human language learning.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores how well deep neural networks, such as large language models and recurrent neural networks, can learn and generalize different languages that vary in their degree of compositional structure. Compositional structure refers to the way language can be broken down into smaller meaningful parts (like words and grammatical rules) that can be combined to create new meanings.
Humans tend to find languages with more compositional and transparent structures easier to learn compared to languages with opaque and irregular structures. This is known as the "learnability advantage." The researchers wanted to see if this learnability advantage also applies to deep neural networks, which could help them become better models for how humans learn language.
The researchers evaluated the neural networks' ability to memorize and generalize linguistic input with varying degrees of compositional structure. They found that both the large language model and recurrent neural networks exhibited a learnability advantage for more structured linguistic input. The neural networks exposed to more compositional languages showed more systematic generalization, greater agreement between different agents, and greater similarity to human learners.
Technical Explanation
The researchers directly tested how neural networks compare to humans in learning and generalizing different languages that vary in their degree of compositional structure. They evaluated the memorization and generalization capabilities of a large language model (specifically, GPT-2) and recurrent neural networks.
The experiment involved training the neural networks on artificial languages with varying degrees of compositional structure, from highly compositional to completely opaque. The researchers then tested the models' ability to memorize and generalize to new linguistic forms.
The results showed that both the large language model and recurrent neural networks exhibited a learnability advantage for more structured linguistic input. Neural networks exposed to more compositional languages demonstrated more systematic generalization, greater agreement between different agents, and greater similarity to human learners, as observed in previous studies on the development of compositionality through interactive learning and the role of language and vision in learning from limited data.
These findings suggest that the learnability advantage observed in human language learning may also apply to deep neural networks, and that compositional structure can play a catalytic role in the necessity of inductive biases for the emergence of systematic generalization in neural networks, as observed in studies on iterated learning.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a compelling demonstration that deep neural networks can exhibit a learnability advantage for more compositional linguistic input, similar to human language learning. This suggests that neural networks may be able to serve as better models for understanding human language acquisition.
However, the study is limited to artificial languages, and it remains to be seen if the same patterns will hold for natural human languages, which are significantly more complex. Additionally, the paper does not address the role of other factors, such as pragmatic and social aspects of language learning, which may also be important for building accurate models of human language development.
Further research is needed to explore the generalizability of these findings to real-world language learning, as well as to understand the specific mechanisms by which compositional structure confers a learnability advantage to neural networks. Investigating the interplay between compositional structure, inductive biases, and systematic generalization in larger, more diverse language models would also be a valuable area of exploration.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates that deep neural networks, like humans, exhibit a learnability advantage for more compositional linguistic input. This finding suggests that neural networks may be able to serve as useful models for understanding human language acquisition, provided that the research is expanded to more natural and complex language scenarios.
The results highlight the importance of compositional structure in driving systematic generalization and learning in both humans and artificial neural networks. As the field of natural language processing continues to advance, incorporating a deeper understanding of the role of compositionality could lead to more human-like and generalizable language models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
From Frege to chatGPT: Compositionality in language, cognition, and deep neural networks
Jacob Russin, Sam Whitman McGrath, Danielle J. Williams, Lotem Elber-Dorozko
0
0
Compositionality has long been considered a key explanatory property underlying human intelligence: arbitrary concepts can be composed into novel complex combinations, permitting the acquisition of an open ended, potentially infinite expressive capacity from finite learning experiences. Influential arguments have held that neural networks fail to explain this aspect of behavior, leading many to dismiss them as viable models of human cognition. Over the last decade, however, modern deep neural networks (DNNs), which share the same fundamental design principles as their predecessors, have come to dominate artificial intelligence, exhibiting the most advanced cognitive behaviors ever demonstrated in machines. In particular, large language models (LLMs), DNNs trained to predict the next word on a large corpus of text, have proven capable of sophisticated behaviors such as writing syntactically complex sentences without grammatical errors, producing cogent chains of reasoning, and even writing original computer programs -- all behaviors thought to require compositional processing. In this chapter, we survey recent empirical work from machine learning for a broad audience in philosophy, cognitive science, and neuroscience, situating recent breakthroughs within the broader context of philosophical arguments about compositionality. In particular, our review emphasizes two approaches to endowing neural networks with compositional generalization capabilities: (1) architectural inductive biases, and (2) metalearning, or learning to learn. We also present findings suggesting that LLM pretraining can be understood as a kind of metalearning, and can thereby equip DNNs with compositional generalization abilities in a similar way. We conclude by discussing the implications that these findings may have for the study of compositionality in human cognition and by suggesting avenues for future research.
5/27/2024
🔍
What makes Models Compositional? A Theoretical View: With Supplement
Parikshit Ram, Tim Klinger, Alexander G. Gray
0
0
Compositionality is thought to be a key component of language, and various compositional benchmarks have been developed to empirically probe the compositional generalization of existing sequence processing models. These benchmarks often highlight failures of existing models, but it is not clear why these models fail in this way. In this paper, we seek to theoretically understand the role the compositional structure of the models plays in these failures and how this structure relates to their expressivity and sample complexity. We propose a general neuro-symbolic definition of compositional functions and their compositional complexity. We then show how various existing general and special purpose sequence processing models (such as recurrent, convolution and attention-based ones) fit this definition and use it to analyze their compositional complexity. Finally, we provide theoretical guarantees for the expressivity and systematic generalization of compositional models that explicitly depend on our proposed definition and highlighting factors which drive poor empirical performance.
5/7/2024
Development of Compositionality and Generalization through Interactive Learning of Language and Action of Robots
Prasanna Vijayaraghavan, Jeffrey Frederic Queisser, Sergio Verduzco Flores, Jun Tani
0
0
Humans excel at applying learned behavior to unlearned situations. A crucial component of this generalization behavior is our ability to compose/decompose a whole into reusable parts, an attribute known as compositionality. One of the fundamental questions in robotics concerns this characteristic. How can linguistic compositionality be developed concomitantly with sensorimotor skills through associative learning, particularly when individuals only learn partial linguistic compositions and their corresponding sensorimotor patterns? To address this question, we propose a brain-inspired neural network model that integrates vision, proprioception, and language into a framework of predictive coding and active inference, based on the free-energy principle. The effectiveness and capabilities of this model were assessed through various simulation experiments conducted with a robot arm. Our results show that generalization in learning to unlearned verb-noun compositions, is significantly enhanced when training variations of task composition are increased. We attribute this to self-organized compositional structures in linguistic latent state space being influenced significantly by sensorimotor learning. Ablation studies show that visual attention and working memory are essential to accurately generate visuo-motor sequences to achieve linguistically represented goals. These insights advance our understanding of mechanisms underlying development of compositionality through interactions of linguistic and sensorimotor experience.
4/1/2024
A Survey on Compositional Learning of AI Models: Theoretical and Experimetnal Practices
Sania Sinha, Tanawan Premsri, Parisa Kordjamshidi
0
0
Compositional learning, mastering the ability to combine basic concepts and construct more intricate ones, is crucial for human cognition, especially in human language comprehension and visual perception. This notion is tightly connected to generalization over unobserved situations. Despite its integral role in intelligence, there is a lack of systematic theoretical and experimental research methodologies, making it difficult to analyze the compositional learning abilities of computational models. In this paper, we survey the literature on compositional learning of AI models and the connections made to cognitive studies. We identify abstract concepts of compositionality in cognitive and linguistic studies and connect these to the computational challenges faced by language and vision models in compositional reasoning. We overview the formal definitions, tasks, evaluation benchmarks, variety of computational models, and theoretical findings. We cover modern studies on large language models to provide a deeper understanding of the cutting-edge compositional capabilities exhibited by state-of-the-art AI models and pinpoint important directions for future research.
6/14/2024