From operculum and body tail movements to different coupling of physical activity and respiratory frequency in farmed gilthead sea bream and European sea bass. Insights on aquaculture biosensing

Overview

• The study used a tri-axial accelerometer attached to the operculum (gill cover) of two species of marine farmed fish - gilthead sea bream and European sea bass.
• It analyzed the raw data from exercised fish to understand their divergent activity and respiratory patterns.
• Cosinor analysis was used to study the daily rhythms of locomotor activity and respiratory frequency in free-swimming fish.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers wanted to understand how two different types of farmed fish - gilthead sea bream and European sea bass - move around and breathe. They attached a special sensor called a tri-axial accelerometer to the operculum (gill cover) of the fish. This allowed them to measure the movements and breathing patterns of the fish.

By looking at the data from fish that were exercising, the researchers found that European sea bass had larger movements of their body and gill covers compared to sea bream. The sea bass also had more stable activity levels at low to medium exercise intensities.

When the fish were swimming freely, the researchers used a type of analysis called cosinor to study the daily rhythms in the fish's activity and breathing. They found that the sea bream had their activity and breathing rhythms synchronized, with peaks in the middle of the day when they are fed. In contrast, the sea bass had their activity and breathing rhythms out of sync, with activity peaking in the early morning and breathing peaking in the afternoon. The sea bass also had a wider daily range of activity and breathing changes.

Overall, the researchers found that less active fish with higher breathing rates tended to be larger and heavier. This suggests that selecting for rapid growth in farmed fish may lead to them becoming less active, which helps them convert food to body mass more efficiently. The researchers believe that monitoring the behavior of farmed fish, using tools like the accelerometer they used, can help researchers and farmers breed healthier and more ethical fish.

Technical Explanation

The study used the AEFishBIT tri-axial accelerometer to externally attach to the operculum of two marine farmed fish species - gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata) and European sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax). This allowed them to assess the divergent activity and respiratory patterns of the two species.

Analysis of the raw data from exercised fish highlighted key differences. European sea bass exhibited larger amplitude movements of their operculum aperture and body tail compared to sea bream. However, the sea bass activity levels were overall more stable at low-medium exercise intensities.

To study the daily rhythms, the researchers used cosinor analysis on data from free-swimming fish. This revealed pronounced daily rhythmicity in both locomotor activity and respiratory frequency for both species. However, the acrophases (peak times) differed - in sea bream, activity and respiration were coupled with peaks around the daily feeding time at 11am. In sea bass, activity and respiration were out of phase, with activity peaking in the early morning and respiration peaking in the afternoon. The sea bass also exhibited a higher daily range of activity and respiration variation.

The researchers found that lower locomotor activity and enhanced respiration were associated with larger body weight in both species. This aligns with the idea that selecting for rapid growth in farming leads to a more sedentary profile, which may improve feed conversion efficiency for growth purposes.

Critical Analysis

The study provides valuable insights into the behavioral differences between two important marine farmed fish species. By using the advanced AEFishBIT accelerometer technology, the researchers were able to gather detailed data on the activity and respiration patterns of the fish.

One limitation is that the study was conducted in a controlled laboratory setting, so the findings may not fully translate to the real-world conditions of commercial aquaculture operations. Additionally, the sample sizes were relatively small, so further research with larger populations would help validate the results.

The researchers also note that the selection for fast growth in farming conditions may lead to unintended consequences, such as reduced activity levels. This raises questions about the long-term welfare and sustainability of such farming practices. Encouraging more research into ethical and sustainable aquaculture practices could help address these concerns.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates the power of using advanced sensor technology, like the AEFishBIT accelerometer, to gain a deeper understanding of the behavior and physiology of farmed fish. The findings suggest that monitoring the activity and respiration patterns of fish can provide valuable insights for breeding more efficient and welfare-friendly aquaculture practices. As the industry continues to evolve, tools that enable detailed assessment of fish behavior and health will become increasingly important for developing sustainable and ethical aquaculture solutions.