From Overfitting to Robustness: Quantity, Quality, and Variety Oriented Negative Sample Selection in Graph Contrastive Learning

Read original: arXiv:2406.15044 - Published 6/24/2024 by Adnan Ali, Jinlong Li, Huanhuan Chen, Ali Kashif Bashir
Total Score

0

From Overfitting to Robustness: Quantity, Quality, and Variety Oriented Negative Sample Selection in Graph Contrastive Learning

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a novel approach to negative sample selection in graph contrastive learning to enhance model robustness and generalization.
  • The key contributions include quantity, quality, and variety oriented negative sample selection strategies, as well as a comprehensive evaluation on multiple benchmark datasets.
  • The findings suggest that the proposed methods can significantly improve the performance of graph contrastive learning models compared to previous approaches.

Plain English Explanation

In machine learning, contrastive learning is a technique that helps models learn useful representations of data by comparing similar and dissimilar examples. This is particularly important for graph-structured data, such as social networks or chemical compounds, where the relationships between entities are crucial.

However, the performance of graph contrastive learning models can be hindered by the selection of "negative" samples - examples that are considered dissimilar and used to train the model to distinguish them from the "positive" samples. Choosing the right negative samples is crucial, as it can impact the model's ability to generalize to new, unseen data.

This paper introduces a new approach to negative sample selection that focuses on three key aspects: quantity, quality, and variety. The authors propose strategies to ensure that the negative samples used during training are diverse, informative, and representative of the underlying data distribution. By doing so, they aim to improve the model's robustness and its ability to generalize to a wide range of scenarios.

The researchers evaluate their methods on several benchmark datasets and demonstrate that the proposed negative sample selection strategies can significantly outperform traditional approaches, leading to more accurate and reliable graph contrastive learning models.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a novel framework for negative sample selection in graph contrastive learning, addressing key challenges such as overfitting and lack of robustness.

The authors propose three complementary strategies for negative sample selection:

  1. Quantity-oriented: Dynamically adjusting the number of negative samples to balance the trade-off between training efficiency and model performance.
  2. Quality-oriented: Selecting negative samples that are informative and challenging for the model, rather than random or easy-to-distinguish samples.
  3. Variety-oriented: Encouraging diverse negative samples to cover a wide range of the data distribution, preventing the model from overfitting to a narrow range of dissimilar examples.

These strategies are implemented within a graph contrastive learning framework and evaluated on multiple benchmark datasets, including social networks and chemical compounds.

The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed negative sample selection methods can significantly improve the performance and robustness of graph contrastive learning models compared to previous approaches. The authors also provide insights into the potential pitfalls of negative sample selection and the importance of considering community structure in graph-based data.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a comprehensive and well-designed study on negative sample selection in graph contrastive learning. The authors thoroughly investigate the trade-offs between quantity, quality, and variety of negative samples, and their experimental results provide strong evidence for the effectiveness of the proposed methods.

One potential limitation of the study is that it focuses primarily on static graph-structured data, while many real-world applications involve dynamic, evolving graphs. It would be valuable to see how the proposed negative sample selection strategies perform in such settings and whether they need to be adapted to account for temporal changes in the data.

Additionally, the paper could have delved deeper into the underlying reasons why the quantity, quality, and variety of negative samples are so crucial for graph contrastive learning. A more detailed discussion of the theoretical foundations and potential edge cases could provide further insights and guidance for future research in this area.

Nevertheless, this work represents a significant contribution to the field of graph contrastive learning and offers practical solutions to the longstanding challenge of negative sample selection. The authors have demonstrated the importance of thoughtful negative sample curation and provided a solid foundation for future research to build upon.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach to negative sample selection in graph contrastive learning, with a focus on quantity, quality, and variety. The proposed strategies aim to enhance the robustness and generalization of graph contrastive learning models, addressing key challenges in the field.

The comprehensive experimental evaluation on multiple benchmark datasets shows that the authors' methods can significantly outperform traditional negative sample selection approaches, leading to more accurate and reliable graph-based models. This work offers valuable insights for researchers and practitioners working on graph representation learning and opens up new avenues for further exploration in this important domain.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

From Overfitting to Robustness: Quantity, Quality, and Variety Oriented Negative Sample Selection in Graph Contrastive Learning
Total Score

0

From Overfitting to Robustness: Quantity, Quality, and Variety Oriented Negative Sample Selection in Graph Contrastive Learning

Adnan Ali, Jinlong Li, Huanhuan Chen, Ali Kashif Bashir

Graph contrastive learning (GCL) aims to contrast positive-negative counterparts to learn the node embeddings, whereas graph data augmentation methods are employed to generate these positive-negative samples. The variation, quantity, and quality of negative samples compared to positive samples play crucial roles in learning meaningful embeddings for node classification downstream tasks. Less variation, excessive quantity, and low-quality negative samples cause the model to be overfitted for particular nodes, resulting in less robust models. To solve the overfitting problem in the GCL paradigm, this study proposes a novel Cumulative Sample Selection (CSS) algorithm by comprehensively considering negative samples' quality, variations, and quantity. Initially, three negative sample pools are constructed: easy, medium, and hard negative samples, which contain 25%, 50%, and 25% of the total available negative samples, respectively. Then, 10% negative samples are selected from each of these three negative sample pools for training the model. After that, a decision agent module evaluates model training results and decides whether to explore more negative samples from three negative sample pools by increasing the ratio or keep exploiting the current sampling ratio. The proposed algorithm is integrated into a proposed graph contrastive learning framework named NegAmplify. NegAmplify is compared with the SOTA methods on nine graph node classification datasets, with seven achieving better node classification accuracy with up to 2.86% improvement.

Read more

6/24/2024

Total Score

0

Topology Reorganized Graph Contrastive Learning with Mitigating Semantic Drift

Jiaqiang Zhang, Songcan Chen

Graph contrastive learning (GCL) is an effective paradigm for node representation learning in graphs. The key components hidden behind GCL are data augmentation and positive-negative pair selection. Typical data augmentations in GCL, such as uniform deletion of edges, are generally blind and resort to local perturbation, which is prone to producing under-diversity views. Additionally, there is a risk of making the augmented data traverse to other classes. Moreover, most methods always treat all other samples as negatives. Such a negative pairing naturally results in sampling bias and likewise may make the learned representation suffer from semantic drift. Therefore, to increase the diversity of the contrastive view, we propose two simple and effective global topological augmentations to compensate current GCL. One is to mine the semantic correlation between nodes in the feature space. The other is to utilize the algebraic properties of the adjacency matrix to characterize the topology by eigen-decomposition. With the help of both, we can retain important edges to build a better view. To reduce the risk of semantic drift, a prototype-based negative pair selection is further designed which can filter false negative samples. Extensive experiments on various tasks demonstrate the advantages of the model compared to the state-of-the-art methods.

Read more

7/25/2024

Multiplex Graph Contrastive Learning with Soft Negatives
Total Score

0

Multiplex Graph Contrastive Learning with Soft Negatives

Zhenhao Zhao, Minhong Zhu, Chen Wang, Sijia Wang, Jiqiang Zhang, Li Chen, Weiran Cai

Graph Contrastive Learning (GCL) seeks to learn nodal or graph representations that contain maximal consistent information from graph-structured data. While node-level contrasting modes are dominating, some efforts commence to explore consistency across different scales. Yet, they tend to lose consistent information and be contaminated by disturbing features. Here, we introduce MUX-GCL, a novel cross-scale contrastive learning paradigm that utilizes multiplex representations as effective patches. While this learning mode minimizes contaminating noises, a commensurate contrasting strategy using positional affinities further avoids information loss by correcting false negative pairs across scales. Extensive downstream experiments demonstrate that MUX-GCL yields multiple state-of-the-art results on public datasets. Our theoretical analysis further guarantees the new objective function as a stricter lower bound of mutual information of raw input features and output embeddings, which rationalizes this paradigm. Code is available at https://github.com/MUX-GCL/Code.

Read more

9/14/2024

Negative as Positive: Enhancing Out-of-distribution Generalization for Graph Contrastive Learning
Total Score

0

Negative as Positive: Enhancing Out-of-distribution Generalization for Graph Contrastive Learning

Zixu Wang, Bingbing Xu, Yige Yuan, Huawei Shen, Xueqi Cheng

Graph contrastive learning (GCL), standing as the dominant paradigm in the realm of graph pre-training, has yielded considerable progress. Nonetheless, its capacity for out-of-distribution (OOD) generalization has been relatively underexplored. In this work, we point out that the traditional optimization of InfoNCE in GCL restricts the cross-domain pairs only to be negative samples, which inevitably enlarges the distribution gap between different domains. This violates the requirement of domain invariance under OOD scenario and consequently impairs the model's OOD generalization performance. To address this issue, we propose a novel strategy Negative as Positive, where the most semantically similar cross-domain negative pairs are treated as positive during GCL. Our experimental results, spanning a wide array of datasets, confirm that this method substantially improves the OOD generalization performance of GCL.

Read more

5/28/2024