From Width-Based Model Checking to Width-Based Automated Theorem Proving
0
📈
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This work introduces a general framework to convert width-based model-checking algorithms into algorithms that can test the validity of graph-theoretic conjectures on classes of graphs with bounded width.
- The framework can be applied to various well-studied width measures, including treewidth and cliquewidth.
- The authors analytically prove that for several long-standing graph-theoretic conjectures, there exists an algorithm that can determine in double-exponential time whether the conjecture is valid on all graphs with treewidth at most k.
- These upper bounds improve significantly on previous theoretical upper bounds obtained using other techniques.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a general framework that can take algorithms used for model checking on graphs with certain width measures (like treewidth or cliquewidth) and turn them into algorithms that can test whether graph-theoretic conjectures are true or false on those same classes of graphs.
The authors show that for several long-standing graph conjectures, they can construct algorithms that can determine in a reasonable amount of time (double-exponential in a parameter related to the graph width) whether the conjecture holds for all graphs with treewidth up to a certain limit. This is an improvement over previous techniques, which could not provide such strong guarantees.
The key idea is to leverage the sophisticated model-checking algorithms developed in the field of parameterized complexity theory to efficiently test graph-theoretic conjectures on restricted classes of graphs.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a general framework to convert width-based model-checking algorithms into algorithms that can be used to test the validity of graph-theoretic conjectures on classes of graphs of bounded width. The framework is modular and can be applied with respect to several well-studied width measures for graphs, including treewidth and cliquewidth.
As a quantitative application of the framework, the authors prove analytically that for several long-standing graph-theoretic conjectures, there exists an algorithm that takes a number k as input and correctly determines in time double-exponential in k^(O(1)) whether the conjecture is valid on all graphs of treewidth at most k.
These upper bounds, which may be regarded as upper-bounds on the size of proofs/disproofs for these conjectures on the class of graphs of treewidth at most k, improve significantly on theoretical upper bounds obtained using previously available techniques.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and potentially impactful framework for converting width-based model-checking algorithms into algorithms for testing graph-theoretic conjectures. The authors demonstrate the power of this approach by proving tight upper bounds on the complexity of deciding several long-standing conjectures on bounded-treewidth graph classes.
One potential limitation is that the framework is restricted to graph properties that can be expressed in a certain logical formalism. Additionally, the double-exponential time complexity, while an improvement over previous results, may still be prohibitively slow for practical applications on large graphs.
Further research could explore extensions of the framework to handle a wider range of graph properties, or investigate techniques to improve the time complexity of the resulting algorithms. It would also be valuable to see empirical evaluations of the framework's performance on real-world graph datasets and conjectures.
Overall, this work makes a significant contribution to the field of parameterized complexity by bridging the gap between width-based model checking and the verification of graph-theoretic conjectures.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a general framework for converting width-based model-checking algorithms into algorithms that can be used to test the validity of graph-theoretic conjectures on classes of graphs with bounded width. The authors demonstrate the power of this approach by proving tight upper bounds on the complexity of deciding several long-standing conjectures on bounded-treewidth graph classes.
The framework is modular and can be applied to various well-studied width measures, providing a versatile tool for the verification of graph-theoretic properties. While the resulting algorithms still have high time complexity, the improvements over previous techniques are significant and could have important implications for the field of parameterized complexity theory and its applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📈
0
From Width-Based Model Checking to Width-Based Automated Theorem Proving
Mateus de Oliveira Oliveira, Farhad Vadiee
In the field of parameterized complexity theory, the study of graph width measures has been intimately connected with the development of width-based model checking algorithms for combinatorial properties on graphs. In this work, we introduce a general framework to convert a large class of width-based model-checking algorithms into algorithms that can be used to test the validity of graph-theoretic conjectures on classes of graphs of bounded width. Our framework is modular and can be applied with respect to several well-studied width measures for graphs, including treewidth and cliquewidth. As a quantitative application of our framework, we prove analytically that for several long-standing graph-theoretic conjectures, there exists an algorithm that takes a number $k$ as input and correctly determines in time double-exponential in $k^{O(1)}$ whether the conjecture is valid on all graphs of treewidth at most $k$. These upper bounds, which may be regarded as upper-bounds on the size of proofs/disproofs for these conjectures on the class of graphs of treewidth at most $k$, improve significantly on theoretical upper bounds obtained using previously available techniques.
Read more9/17/2024
🎲
0
Decidability of Querying First-Order Theories via Countermodels of Finite Width
Thomas Feller, Tim S. Lyon, Piotr Ostropolski-Nalewaja, Sebastian Rudolph
We propose a generic framework for establishing the decidability of a wide range of logical entailment problems (briefly called querying), based on the existence of countermodels that are structurally simple, gauged by certain types of width measures (with treewidth and cliquewidth as popular examples). As an important special case of our framework, we identify logics exhibiting width-finite finitely universal model sets, warranting decidable entailment for a wide range of homomorphism-closed queries, subsuming a diverse set of practically relevant query languages. As a particularly powerful width measure, we propose to employ Blumensath's partitionwidth, which subsumes various other commonly considered width measures and exhibits highly favorable computational and structural properties. Focusing on the formalism of existential rules as a popular showcase, we explain how finite partitionwidth sets of rules subsume other known abstract decidable classes but - leveraging existing notions of stratification - also cover a wide range of new rulesets. We expose natural limitations for fitting the class of finite unification sets into our picture and suggest several options for remedy.
Read more9/17/2024
🔍
0
A Fixed-Parameter Tractable Algorithm for Counting Markov Equivalence Classes with the same Skeleton
Vidya Sagar Sharma
Causal DAGs (also known as Bayesian networks) are a popular tool for encoding conditional dependencies between random variables. In a causal DAG, the random variables are modeled as vertices in the DAG, and it is stipulated that every random variable is independent of its ancestors conditioned on its parents. It is possible, however, for two different causal DAGs on the same set of random variables to encode exactly the same set of conditional dependencies. Such causal DAGs are said to be Markov equivalent, and equivalence classes of Markov equivalent DAGs are known as Markov Equivalent Classes (MECs). Beautiful combinatorial characterizations of MECs have been developed in the past few decades, and it is known, in particular that all DAGs in the same MEC must have the same skeleton (underlying undirected graph) and v-structures (induced subgraph of the form $arightarrow b leftarrow c$). These combinatorial characterizations also suggest several natural algorithmic questions. One of these is: given an undirected graph $G$ as input, how many distinct Markov equivalence classes have the skeleton $G$? Much work has been devoted in the last few years to this and other closely related problems. However, to the best of our knowledge, a polynomial time algorithm for the problem remains unknown. In this paper, we make progress towards this goal by giving a fixed parameter tractable algorithm for the above problem, with the parameters being the treewidth and the maximum degree of the input graph $G$. The main technical ingredient in our work is a construction we refer to as shadow, which lets us create a local description of long-range constraints imposed by the combinatorial characterizations of MECs.
Read more7/4/2024
↗️
0
Parameterized Verification of Round-based Distributed Algorithms via Extended Threshold Automata
Tom Baumeister, Paul Eichler, Swen Jacobs, Mouhammad Sakr, Marcus Volp
Threshold automata are a computational model that has proven to be versatile in modeling threshold-based distributed algorithms and enabling their completely automatic parameterized verification. We present novel techniques for the verification of threshold automata, based on well-structured transition systems, that allow us to extend the expressiveness of both the computational model and the specifications that can be verified. In particular, we extend the model to allow decrements and resets of shared variables, possibly on cycles, and the specifications to general coverability. While these extensions of the model in general lead to undecidability, our algorithms provide a semi-decision procedure. We demonstrate the benefit of our extensions by showing that we can model complex round-based algorithms such as the phase king consensus algorithm and the Red Belly Blockchain protocol (published in 2019), and verify them fully automatically for the first time.
Read more7/1/2024