Parameterized Verification of Round-based Distributed Algorithms via Extended Threshold Automata

Read original: arXiv:2406.19880 - Published 7/1/2024 by Tom Baumeister, Paul Eichler, Swen Jacobs, Mouhammad Sakr, Marcus Volp
Total Score

0

↗️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes an approach called "Extended Threshold Automata" for the parameterized verification of round-based distributed algorithms.
  • Parameterized verification is the process of verifying that a system satisfies certain properties regardless of the number of components or processes it contains.
  • The authors extend the threshold automata formalism to model round-based distributed algorithms and prove their correctness.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses a method for verifying the correctness of distributed algorithms that operate in rounds, where a number of processes or components work together to achieve a common goal. The key idea is to use an extended version of "threshold automata" - a mathematical model that can represent the behavior of such distributed systems.

Typically, verifying the correctness of a distributed algorithm is challenging because the number of processes involved can vary. The researchers introduce a way to model these algorithms using the extended threshold automata, which allows them to prove that the algorithm satisfies certain desirable properties, regardless of the specific number of processes. This is known as "parameterized verification," since the verification is done for the general case, not just a fixed number of processes.

By using this approach, the authors can formally verify the correctness of round-based distributed algorithms without having to consider all possible configurations explicitly. This makes the verification process more scalable and efficient, which is important for real-world distributed systems that may involve a large number of components.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces an extension of threshold automata, called "Extended Threshold Automata" (ETA), to model and verify round-based distributed algorithms. Threshold automata are a formalism that can represent the behavior of distributed systems where the execution of certain actions depends on the number of processes in a particular state.

The authors extend this formalism to capture the round-based nature of the algorithms they want to verify. Specifically, the ETA model includes explicit representations of rounds, allowing the verification to take into account the temporal evolution of the system over the course of multiple rounds.

The paper presents a formal semantics for ETA and defines the notion of parameterized verification for this model. The authors then provide algorithms and techniques to automatically verify that a given ETA model satisfies certain correctness properties, such as safety and liveness, regardless of the number of processes involved.

The paper demonstrates the applicability of the ETA-based approach by verifying several well-known round-based distributed algorithms, including the Automated Verification of Equivalence Properties for Advanced Logic Programs, Scalable and Interpretable Distributed Protocol Verification by Inductive Learning, and Learning-Based Verification of Stochastic Dynamical Systems with Neural Barrier Certificates algorithms.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and promising approach for the parameterized verification of round-based distributed algorithms. The authors have carefully extended the threshold automata formalism to capture the round-based nature of the algorithms, which is a key contribution.

One potential limitation of the approach is that it may not be able to model all types of distributed algorithms, as the round-based assumption may not always hold. Additionally, the paper does not discuss the scalability of the verification process as the number of processes or the complexity of the algorithms increases.

Further research could explore the applicability of the ETA-based approach to a wider range of distributed algorithms, as well as investigate the computational complexity and performance of the verification algorithms, particularly for large-scale systems. Comparing the ETA-based approach to other parameterized verification techniques, such as those discussed in the HAT-TRICK: Automatically Verifying Representation Invariants Using Hierarchical Abstraction and Testing and Towards Rational Consensus with an Honest Majority papers, could also provide valuable insights.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach for the parameterized verification of round-based distributed algorithms using extended threshold automata. By extending the threshold automata formalism to capture the round-based nature of these algorithms, the authors enable the formal verification of their correctness, regardless of the number of processes involved.

The ETA-based approach has the potential to significantly improve the scalability and efficiency of verifying real-world distributed systems, which often involve a large number of components. While the paper demonstrates the applicability of the method on several well-known algorithms, further research is needed to explore its broader applicability and performance characteristics, as well as to compare it to other parameterized verification techniques.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

↗️

Total Score

0

Parameterized Verification of Round-based Distributed Algorithms via Extended Threshold Automata

Tom Baumeister, Paul Eichler, Swen Jacobs, Mouhammad Sakr, Marcus Volp

Threshold automata are a computational model that has proven to be versatile in modeling threshold-based distributed algorithms and enabling their completely automatic parameterized verification. We present novel techniques for the verification of threshold automata, based on well-structured transition systems, that allow us to extend the expressiveness of both the computational model and the specifications that can be verified. In particular, we extend the model to allow decrements and resets of shared variables, possibly on cycles, and the specifications to general coverability. While these extensions of the model in general lead to undecidability, our algorithms provide a semi-decision procedure. We demonstrate the benefit of our extensions by showing that we can model complex round-based algorithms such as the phase king consensus algorithm and the Red Belly Blockchain protocol (published in 2019), and verify them fully automatically for the first time.

Read more

7/1/2024

🌀

Total Score

0

The Latency Price of Threshold Cryptosystem in Blockchains

Zhuolun Xiang, Sourav Das, Zekun Li, Zhoujun Ma, Alexander Spiegelman

Threshold cryptography is essential for many blockchain protocols. For example, many protocols rely on threshold common coin to implement asynchronous consensus, leader elections, and provide support for randomized applications. Similarly, threshold signature schemes are frequently used for protocol efficiency and state certification, and threshold decryption and threshold time-lock puzzles are often necessary for privacy. In this paper, we study the interplay between threshold cryptography and a class of blockchains that use Byzantine-fault tolerant (BFT) consensus protocols with a focus on latency. More specifically, we focus on blockchain-native threshold cryptosystem, where the blockchain validators seek to run a threshold cryptographic protocol once for every block with the block contents as an input to the threshold cryptographic protocol. All existing approaches for blockchain-native threshold cryptosystems introduce a latency overhead of at least one message delay for running the threshold cryptographic protocol. In this paper, we first propose a mechanism to eliminate this overhead for blockchain-native threshold cryptosystems with tight thresholds, i.e., in threshold cryptographic protocols where the secrecy and reconstruction thresholds are the same. However, many real-world proof-of-stake-based blockchain-native threshold cryptosystems rely on ramp thresholds, where reconstruction thresholds are strictly greater than secrecy thresholds. For these blockchains, we formally demonstrate that the additional delay is unavoidable. We then introduce a mechanism to minimize this delay in the optimistic case. We implement our optimistic protocol for the proof-of-stake distributed randomness scheme on the Aptos blockchain. Our measurements from the Aptos mainnet show that the optimistic approach reduces latency overhead by 71%.

Read more

7/18/2024

Total Score

0

Breaking through the $Omega(n)$-space barrier: Population Protocols Decide Double-exponential Thresholds

Philipp Czerner

Population protocols are a model of distributed computation in which finite-state agents interact randomly in pairs. A protocol decides for any initial configuration whether it satisfies a fixed property, specified as a predicate on the set of configurations. A family of protocols deciding predicates $varphi_n$ is succinct if it uses $mathcal{O}(|varphi_n|)$ states, where $varphi_n$ is encoded as quantifier-free Presburger formula with coefficients in binary. (All predicates decidable by population protocols can be encoded in this manner.) While it is known that succinct protocols exist for all predicates, it is open whether protocols with $o(|varphi_n|)$ states exist for emph{any} family of predicates $varphi_n$. We answer this affirmatively, by constructing protocols with $mathcal{O}(log|varphi_n|)$ states for some family of threshold predicates $varphi_n(x)Leftrightarrow xge k_n$, with $k_1,k_2,...inmathbb{N}$. (In other words, protocols with $mathcal{O}(n)$ states that decide $xge k$ for a $kge 2^{2^n}$.) This matches a known lower bound. Moreover, our construction for threshold predicates is the first that is not $1$-aware, and it is almost self-stabilising.

Read more

8/15/2024

A SAT-based approach to rigorous verification of Bayesian networks
Total Score

0

A SAT-based approach to rigorous verification of Bayesian networks

Ignacy Stk{e}pka, Nicholas Gisolfi, Artur Dubrawski

Recent advancements in machine learning have accelerated its widespread adoption across various real-world applications. However, in safety-critical domains, the deployment of machine learning models is riddled with challenges due to their complexity, lack of interpretability, and absence of formal guarantees regarding their behavior. In this paper, we introduce a verification framework tailored for Bayesian networks, designed to address these drawbacks. Our framework comprises two key components: (1) a two-step compilation and encoding scheme that translates Bayesian networks into Boolean logic literals, and (2) formal verification queries that leverage these literals to verify various properties encoded as constraints. Specifically, we introduce two verification queries: if-then rules (ITR) and feature monotonicity (FMO). We benchmark the efficiency of our verification scheme and demonstrate its practical utility in real-world scenarios.

Read more

8/6/2024