On fusing active and passive acoustic sensing for simultaneous localization and mapping

Read original: arXiv:2404.13116 - Published 4/23/2024 by Aidan J. Bradley, Nicole Abaid
Total Score

0

On fusing active and passive acoustic sensing for simultaneous localization and mapping

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper discusses the fusion of active and passive acoustic sensing for simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM).
  • It proposes a system that combines active sonar and passive acoustic sensing to improve the accuracy and robustness of SLAM in underwater environments.
  • The key techniques used include array processing, extended Kalman filters, and the FastSLAM 2.0 algorithm.

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a way to combine two different types of sound sensing to create a more accurate and reliable system for mapping an underwater environment and tracking the location of a moving object, such as a submarine or a robot.

The first type of sound sensing is called "active" sensing, where the system sends out its own sound waves and listens for the echoes to bounce back. This is similar to how bats or dolphins use echolocation to navigate. The second type is "passive" sensing, where the system just listens for any sounds that are already present in the environment, without sending out its own signals.

By using both active and passive sensing together, the system can get a more complete picture of the underwater scene. The active sensing provides detailed information about the shape and location of objects, while the passive sensing can pick up on subtle sounds that might indicate the presence of moving targets, like a passing submarine.

The key technical approaches used in this paper include:

  • Array Processing: a way of processing the signals from multiple sound sensors to improve the accuracy of the measurements.
  • Extended Kalman Filters: a mathematical technique for tracking the location of moving objects based on noisy sensor data.
  • FastSLAM 2.0: an algorithm for simultaneously building a map of the environment and tracking the location of the system within that map.

By combining these different techniques, the researchers aimed to create a SLAM system that is more robust and accurate than those that use only a single type of sound sensing.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a system that fuses active and passive acoustic sensing for simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) in underwater environments. The key components of the system include:

Array Processing: The system uses an array of acoustic sensors to perform beamforming and direction-of-arrival estimation, which improves the accuracy of the active sonar measurements.

Extended Kalman Filter: An extended Kalman filter is used to track the state of the system, including the position and velocity of the moving platform and the positions of detected objects.

FastSLAM 2.0: The FastSLAM 2.0 algorithm is used to simultaneously build a map of the environment and track the location of the system within that map. This allows the system to maintain an accurate understanding of its surroundings as it moves.

The fusion of active and passive sensing provides several benefits. The active sonar provides detailed information about the shape and location of objects, while the passive sensing can detect subtle sounds that may indicate the presence of moving targets. By combining these two modalities, the system can achieve more robust and accurate SLAM performance compared to using either sensing mode alone.

The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed approach through simulation experiments and discusses potential applications in underwater robotics and naval operations.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a well-designed approach to fusing active and passive acoustic sensing for SLAM, and the technical details are thoroughly explained. However, a few potential limitations and areas for further research are worth noting:

  1. The paper focuses on simulation-based evaluations, and it would be valuable to see the performance of the system in real-world underwater environments, which may present additional challenges and noise sources.

  2. The system assumes the availability of a pre-calibrated array of acoustic sensors, which may not always be feasible in practical applications. Exploring techniques for self-calibration or robust performance with imperfect sensor arrays could be an interesting direction for future research.

  3. The paper does not address the power consumption and computational complexity of the proposed system, which could be important factors for real-world deployment, especially in resource-constrained scenarios like underwater vehicles.

  4. Cooperative sensing and communication in ISAC networks could potentially enhance the system's performance by leveraging information sharing and coordination between multiple sensing platforms.

  5. Learning which side to scan in multi-view SLAM systems could be an interesting extension to the proposed approach, as it could further optimize the use of active and passive sensing resources.

Overall, the paper presents a promising approach to fusing active and passive acoustic sensing for SLAM, and the proposed techniques could have significant impacts in underwater robotics and other related fields.

Conclusion

The paper introduces a system that combines active sonar and passive acoustic sensing to improve the accuracy and robustness of simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) in underwater environments. By leveraging array processing, extended Kalman filters, and the FastSLAM 2.0 algorithm, the proposed approach can effectively fuse the complementary information from both active and passive sensing modalities.

The key benefits of this fusion-based SLAM system include enhanced object detection and tracking, as well as more accurate mapping of the underwater environment. The technical details and simulation results presented in the paper suggest that this approach could have valuable applications in areas such as underwater robotics, naval operations, and environmental monitoring.

While the paper focuses on simulation-based evaluations, further research is needed to address practical deployment challenges and explore potential enhancements, such as self-calibration, power optimization, and cooperative sensing across multiple platforms. Nonetheless, the fusion of active and passive acoustic sensing represents a promising direction for advancing the state-of-the-art in underwater SLAM and related fields.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

On fusing active and passive acoustic sensing for simultaneous localization and mapping
Total Score

0

On fusing active and passive acoustic sensing for simultaneous localization and mapping

Aidan J. Bradley, Nicole Abaid

Studies on the social behaviors of bats show that they have the ability to eavesdrop on the signals emitted by conspecifics in their vicinity. They can fuse this ``passive data with actively collected data from their own signals to get more information about their environment, allowing them to fly and hunt more efficiently and to avoid or cause jamming when competing for prey. Acoustic sensors are capable of similar feats but are generally used in only an active or passive capacity at one time. Is there a benefit to using both active and passive sensing simultaneously in the same array? In this work we define a family of models for active, passive, and fused sensing systems to measure range and bearing data from an environment defined by point-based landmarks. These measurements are used to solve the problem of simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) with extended Kalman filter (EKF) and FastSLAM 2.0 approaches. Our results show agreement with previous findings. Specifically, when active sensing is limited to a narrow angular range, fused sensing can perform just as accurately if not better, while also allowing the sensor to perceive more of the surrounding environment.

Read more

4/23/2024

Accurate Passive Radar via an Uncertainty-Aware Fusion of Wi-Fi Sensing Data
Total Score

0

Accurate Passive Radar via an Uncertainty-Aware Fusion of Wi-Fi Sensing Data

Marco Cominelli, Francesco Gringoli, Lance M. Kaplan, Mani B. Srivastava, Federico Cerutti

Wi-Fi devices can effectively be used as passive radar systems that sense what happens in the surroundings and can even discern human activity. We propose, for the first time, a principled architecture which employs Variational Auto-Encoders for estimating a latent distribution responsible for generating the data, and Evidential Deep Learning for its ability to sense out-of-distribution activities. We verify that the fused data processed by different antennas of the same Wi-Fi receiver results in increased accuracy of human activity recognition compared with the most recent benchmarks, while still being informative when facing out-of-distribution samples and enabling semantic interpretation of latent variables in terms of physical phenomena. The results of this paper are a first contribution toward the ultimate goal of providing a flexible, semantic characterisation of black-swan events, i.e., events for which we have limited to no training data.

Read more

7/9/2024

📊

Total Score

0

Multi-Stage Fusion Architecture for Small-Drone Localization and Identification Using Passive RF and EO Imagery: A Case Study

Thakshila Wimalajeewa Wewelwala, Thomas W. Tedesso, Tony Davis

Reliable detection, localization and identification of small drones is essential to promote safe, secure and privacy-respecting operation of Unmanned-Aerial Systems (UAS), or simply, drones. This is an increasingly challenging problem with only single modality sensing, especially, to detect and identify small drones. In this work, a multi-stage fusion architecture using passive radio frequency (RF) and electro-optic (EO) imagery data is developed to leverage the synergies of the modalities to improve the overall tracking and classification capabilities. For detection with EO-imagery, supervised deep learning based techniques as well as unsupervised foreground/background separation techniques are explored to cope with challenging environments. Using real collected data for Group 1 and 2 drones, the capability of each algorithm is quantified. In order to compensate for any performance gaps in detection with only EO imagery as well as to provide a unique device identifier for the drones, passive RF is integrated with EO imagery whenever available. In particular, drone detections in the image plane are combined with passive RF location estimates via detection-to-detection association after 3D to 2D transformation. Final tracking is performed on the composite detections in the 2D image plane. Each track centroid is given a unique identification obtained via RF fingerprinting. The proposed fusion architecture is tested and the tracking and performance is quantified over the range to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed approaches using simultaneously collected passive RF and EO data at the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) through ESCAPE-21 (Experiments, Scenarios, Concept of Operations, and Prototype Engineering) data collect

Read more

6/26/2024

Active Sensing Strategy: Multi-Modal, Multi-Robot Source Localization and Mapping in Real-World Settings with Fixed One-Way Switching
Total Score

0

Active Sensing Strategy: Multi-Modal, Multi-Robot Source Localization and Mapping in Real-World Settings with Fixed One-Way Switching

Vu Phi Tran, Asanka G. Perera, Matthew A. Garratt, Kathryn Kasmarik, Sreenatha G. Anavatti

This paper introduces a state-machine model for a multi-modal, multi-robot environmental sensing algorithm tailored to dynamic real-world settings. The algorithm uniquely combines two exploration strategies for gas source localization and mapping: (1) an initial exploration phase using multi-robot coverage path planning with variable formations for early gas field indication; and (2) a subsequent active sensing phase employing multi-robot swarms for precise field estimation. The state machine governs the transition between these two phases. During exploration, a coverage path maximizes the visited area while measuring gas concentration and estimating the initial gas field at predefined sample times. In the active sensing phase, mobile robots in a swarm collaborate to select the next measurement point, ensuring coordinated and efficient sensing. System validation involves hardware-in-the-loop experiments and real-time tests with a radio source emulating a gas field. The approach is benchmarked against state-of-the-art single-mode active sensing and gas source localization techniques. Evaluation highlights the multi-modal switching approach's ability to expedite convergence, navigate obstacles in dynamic environments, and significantly enhance gas source location accuracy. The findings show a 43% reduction in turnaround time, a 50% increase in estimation accuracy, and improved robustness of multi-robot environmental sensing in cluttered scenarios without collisions, surpassing the performance of conventional active sensing strategies.

Read more

7/2/2024