Fusion of the Power from Citations: Enhance your Influence by Integrating Information from References
0
๐งช
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper aims to formulate the problem of predicting whether a research paper can increase the influence of its authors.
- The proposed framework includes:
- A metric called ACC (Average Annual Citation Counts) to measure authors' impact based on their published papers, citation counts, and contributions.
- A model called RD-GAT (Reference-Depth Graph Attention Network) to integrate heterogeneous graph information from different depths of references.
Plain English Explanation
The research world is competitive, and a scholar's influence plays a big role in whether their work gets accepted. Most existing studies focus on predicting how many times a paper will be cited or finding the most influential papers. This study, however, aims to predict whether a paper can actually increase the influence of its authors.
To do this, the researchers first developed a metric called ACC (Average Annual Citation Counts) to measure how much impact an author has based on their published papers, the number of times those papers are cited, and each paper's individual contributions. They then created a model called RD-GAT (Reference-Depth Graph Attention Network) to analyze the connections and relationships between different research papers and their references.
By using the ACC metric and the RD-GAT model, scholars can get feedback on whether their upcoming paper is likely to boost their influence in the research community before they even publish it. This can help them make more strategic decisions about their work.
Technical Explanation
The researchers first introduced the ACC (Average Annual Citation Counts) metric to quantify the yearly impact of authors based on their published papers, citation counts, and individual contributions to each paper.
They then proposed the RD-GAT (Reference-Depth Graph Attention Network) model to integrate heterogeneous graph information from different depths of references by assigning attention coefficients to them. This allows the model to better capture the complex relationships and influences within the academic citation network.
Experiments on the AMiner dataset showed that the ACC metric could effectively represent authors' influence, and the RD-GAT model outperformed baseline models in terms of efficiency and robustness against overfitting on the academic citation network.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a promising framework for predicting the impact of research papers on their authors' influence. However, it does not address potential limitations, such as the availability and quality of data required to calculate the ACC metric accurately, or the generalizability of the RD-GAT model to different academic domains or citation networks.
Additionally, the paper does not discuss the ethical implications of this type of predictive modeling, such as the potential for authors to optimize their papers solely for the purpose of increasing their own influence, rather than focusing on the quality and significance of the research itself.
Further research could explore ways to disentangle the potential impacts of papers into diffusion and conformity, or to model citation worthiness using attention-based mechanisms, in order to better understand the multifaceted nature of academic influence and its causal relationship with paper citations.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to predicting the impact of research papers on their authors' influence, which could provide valuable feedback to scholars before they publish their work. By using the ACC metric and the RD-GAT model, the framework aims to identify whether a paper can increase a scholar's influence within the academic community. While further research is needed to address potential limitations and ethical considerations, this study offers a promising step towards understanding the true impact of science, which can sometimes be obscured by hidden citations.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
๐งช
0
Fusion of the Power from Citations: Enhance your Influence by Integrating Information from References
Cong Qi, Qin Liu, Kan Liu
Influence prediction plays a crucial role in the academic community. The amount of scholars' influence determines whether their work will be accepted by others. Most existing research focuses on predicting one paper's citation count after a period or identifying the most influential papers among the massive candidates, without concentrating on an individual paper's negative or positive impact on its authors. Thus, this study aims to formulate the prediction problem to identify whether one paper can increase scholars' influence or not, which can provide feedback to the authors before they publish their papers. First, we presented the self-adapted ACC (Average Annual Citation Counts) metric to measure authors' impact yearly based on their annual published papers, paper citation counts, and contributions in each paper. Then, we proposed the RD-GAT (Reference-Depth Graph Attention Network) model to integrate heterogeneous graph information from different depth of references by assigning attention coefficients on them. Experiments on AMiner dataset demonstrated that the proposed ACC metrics could represent the authors influence effectively, and the RD-GAT model is more efficiently on the academic citation network, and have stronger robustness against the overfitting problem compared with the baseline models. By applying the framework in this work, scholars can identify whether their papers can improve their influence in the future.
Read more6/27/2024
0
Predicting Award Winning Research Papers at Publication Time
Riccardo Vella, Andrea Vitaletti, Fabrizio Silvestri
In recent years, many studies have been focusing on predicting the scientific impact of research papers. Most of these predictions are based on citations count or rely on features obtainable only from already published papers. In this study, we predict the likelihood for a research paper of winning an award only relying on information available at publication time. For each paper, we build the citation subgraph induced from its bibliography. We initially consider some features of this subgraph, such as the density and the global clustering coefficient, to make our prediction. Then, we mix this information with textual features, extracted from the abstract and the title, to obtain a more accurate final prediction. We made our experiments considering the ArnetMiner citation graph, while the ground truth on award-winning papers has been obtained from a collection of best paper awards from 32 computer science conferences. In our experiment, we obtained an encouraging F1 score of 0.694. Remarkably, The high recall and the low false negatives rate, show how the model performs very well at identifying papers that will not win an award. This behavior can help researchers in getting a first evaluation of their work at publication time. Lastly, we made some first experiments on interpretability. Our results highlight some interesting patterns both in topological and textual features.
Read more6/19/2024
โ
0
Disentangling the Potential Impacts of Papers into Diffusion, Conformity, and Contribution Values
Zhikai Xue, Guoxiu He, Zhuoren Jiang, Sichen Gu, Yangyang Kang, Star Zhao, Wei Lu
The scientific impact of academic papers is influenced by intricate factors such as dynamic popularity and inherent contribution. Existing models typically rely on static graphs for citation count estimation, failing to differentiate among its sources. In contrast, we propose distinguishing effects derived from various factors and predicting citation increments as estimated potential impacts within the dynamic context. In this research, we introduce a novel model, DPPDCC, which Disentangles the Potential impacts of Papers into Diffusion, Conformity, and Contribution values. It encodes temporal and structural features within dynamic heterogeneous graphs derived from the citation networks and applies various auxiliary tasks for disentanglement. By emphasizing comparative and co-cited/citing information and aggregating snapshots evolutionarily, DPPDCC captures knowledge flow within the citation network. Afterwards, popularity is outlined by contrasting augmented graphs to extract the essence of citation diffusion and predicting citation accumulation bins for quantitative conformity modeling. Orthogonal constraints ensure distinct modeling of each perspective, preserving the contribution value. To gauge generalization across publication times and replicate the realistic dynamic context, we partition data based on specific time points and retain all samples without strict filtering. Extensive experiments on three datasets validate DPPDCC's superiority over baselines for papers published previously, freshly, and immediately, with further analyses confirming its robustness. Our codes and supplementary materials can be found at https://github.com/ECNU-Text-Computing/DPPDCC.
Read more9/4/2024
0
Temporal Graph Neural Network-Powered Paper Recommendation on Dynamic Citation Networks
Junhao Shen, Mohammad Ausaf Ali Haqqani, Beichen Hu, Cheng Huang, Xihao Xie, Tsengdar Lee, Jia Zhang
Due to the rapid growth of scientific publications, identifying all related reference articles in the literature has become increasingly challenging yet highly demanding. Existing methods primarily assess candidate publications from a static perspective, focusing on the content of articles and their structural information, such as citation relationships. There is a lack of research regarding how to account for the evolving impact among papers on their embeddings. Toward this goal, this paper introduces a temporal dimension to paper recommendation strategies. The core idea is to continuously update a paper's embedding when new citation relationships appear, enhancing its relevance for future recommendations. Whenever a citation relationship is added to the literature upon the publication of a paper, the embeddings of the two related papers are updated through a Temporal Graph Neural Network (TGN). A learnable memory update module based on a Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) is utilized to study the evolution of the embedding of a paper in order to predict its reference impact in a future timestamp. Such a TGN-based model learns a pattern of how people's views of the paper may evolve, aiming to guide paper recommendations more precisely. Extensive experiments on an open citation network dataset, including 313,278 articles from https://paperswithcode.com/about PaperWithCode, have demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
Read more8/29/2024