G4SATBench: Benchmarking and Advancing SAT Solving with Graph Neural Networks

Overview

• The paper presents a new benchmark, G4SATBench, for evaluating graph neural network (GNN) models on the Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) problem.
• The benchmark includes a diverse set of 7 SAT datasets with 3 difficulty levels, and evaluates a range of GNN models across different prediction tasks, training objectives, and inference algorithms.
• The paper also compares the solving processes of GNN-based SAT solvers with traditional search-based heuristics to understand the strengths and limitations of the GNN approaches.

Plain English Explanation

The Boolean Satisfiability (SAT) problem is a fundamental challenge in computer science, with applications in areas like artificial intelligence, hardware design, and software verification. Graph neural networks (GNNs) have emerged as a promising approach for solving the SAT problem, offering potential alternatives to traditional backtracking or local search SAT solvers.

However, the field of GNN-based SAT solvers has lacked a unified dataset and a fair benchmark to evaluate and compare the existing approaches. To address this, the researchers present G4SATBench, the first comprehensive benchmark for GNN-based SAT solvers.

The benchmark includes a diverse set of 7 SAT datasets, covering different problem types and difficulty levels. The researchers evaluate a broad range of GNN models on various prediction tasks, training objectives, and inference algorithms. By comparing the solving processes of the GNN-based solvers with traditional search-based heuristics, the researchers aim to understand the strengths and limitations of the GNN approaches.

The key insight is that while existing GNN models can effectively learn a solving strategy akin to greedy local search, they struggle to learn the backtracking search techniques used in traditional SAT solvers. This suggests that there is still room for improvement in developing GNN-based SAT solvers that can match or outperform the traditional approaches.

Technical Explanation

The researchers curate a diverse set of 7 SAT datasets for the G4SATBench benchmark, covering a range of problem types and difficulty levels. These datasets include: 3-SAT, Circuit-SAT, and Knuth-bendix problems, among others.

They then evaluate a broad range of GNN models, including graph convolutional networks (GCNs), graph attention networks (GATs), and [graph isomorphism networks (GINs)], on various prediction tasks, such as variable assignment, clause satisfaction, and SAT problem solving.

The GNN models are trained using different objectives, including binary classification, multi-class classification, and reinforcement learning. The researchers also experiment with different inference algorithms, such as greedy search, beam search, and backtracking.

By comparing the solving processes of the GNN-based solvers with traditional search-based heuristics, the researchers find that the GNN models can effectively learn a solving strategy akin to greedy local search, but struggle to learn the backtracking search techniques used in traditional SAT solvers.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge that their benchmark does not cover all possible formulations of the SAT problem, and that the selected datasets may not represent the full complexity of real-world SAT instances. They also note that the performance of GNN-based SAT solvers may be influenced by factors such as the size and complexity of the input graphs, the choice of GNN architecture, and the training hyperparameters.

Furthermore, the paper does not explore the potential use of novel techniques for query plan representation based on graphs or other advanced GNN architectures, such as dynamic graph neural networks, which could potentially improve the performance of GNN-based SAT solvers.

Overall, the G4SATBench benchmark represents a significant step forward in the field of GNN-based SAT solvers, but further research is needed to address the limitations and explore more advanced GNN architectures and techniques.

Conclusion

The G4SATBench benchmark provides a comprehensive evaluation framework for GNN-based SAT solvers, addressing a crucial gap in the field. The paper's findings suggest that existing GNN models can effectively learn a solving strategy akin to greedy local search, but struggle to learn the backtracking search techniques used in traditional SAT solvers.

These insights highlight the need for further research and development in GNN-based SAT solvers to match or outperform the performance of traditional approaches. The G4SATBench benchmark and the lessons learned from this study can serve as a valuable foundation for advancing the state of the art in this important area of computer science.