GNNBENCH: Fair and Productive Benchmarking for Single-GPU GNN System
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper introduces GnnBench, a benchmarking framework for evaluating the performance of single-GPU Graph Neural Network (GNN) systems.
- GnnBench aims to provide a fair and productive approach to benchmarking GNN systems, addressing challenges like workload diversity, result reproducibility, and system-level analysis.
- The framework includes a suite of diverse workloads, standardized evaluation metrics, and tools for comprehensive system-level profiling and analysis.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new benchmarking framework called GnnBench, which is designed to help researchers and developers evaluate the performance of Graph Neural Network (GNN) systems running on a single GPU. GNNs are a type of machine learning model that can operate on data represented as graphs, with nodes and connections between them.
GnnBench aims to provide a fair and useful way to benchmark GNN systems. This is important because as GNNs become more widely used, there is a need for a standardized way to compare their performance across different hardware and software setups. GnnBench includes a diverse set of workloads, or test problems, that cover a range of graph-based tasks. It also defines standard metrics for evaluating the performance of GNN systems, and provides tools to analyze the systems at a detailed, system-level perspective.
The key benefits of GnnBench are that it enables more consistent and informative benchmarking of GNN systems, which can help accelerate the development and deployment of these powerful models. By having a common framework, researchers and engineers can more easily compare the strengths and weaknesses of different GNN systems, and identify areas for improvement.
Technical Explanation
The paper first provides background on the unique computational characteristics of GNN models, which involve iterative message passing between interconnected nodes. This presents challenges for benchmarking that standard ML benchmarks may not capture.
To address this, the authors designed GnnBench with several key goals in mind:
- Workload diversity: The benchmark includes a suite of diverse graph datasets and tasks, covering a range of real-world applications like social networks, molecular modeling, and traffic forecasting.
- Result reproducibility: GnnBench defines standardized evaluation metrics and experimental protocols to ensure fair and consistent comparisons between GNN systems.
- System-level analysis: The framework includes profiling tools to collect detailed performance data, enabling in-depth analysis of the underlying hardware and software factors impacting GNN inference.
The GnnBench workload suite encompasses both synthetic and real-world graph datasets, with varying sizes, structures, and task complexity. The evaluation metrics cover both model accuracy and system-level performance, such as throughput, latency, and energy efficiency.
The authors demonstrate the utility of GnnBench by evaluating several state-of-the-art GNN systems across the benchmark suite. The results reveal performance differences between the systems, as well as insights into the computational bottlenecks and optimization opportunities for single-GPU GNN inference.
Critical Analysis
The GnnBench framework represents a valuable contribution to the field of GNN research and development. By providing a standardized and comprehensive benchmarking suite, it addresses important challenges in the current ad-hoc approach to GNN evaluation.
However, the authors acknowledge several limitations and areas for future work:
- The benchmark is currently focused on single-GPU systems, while real-world deployment often requires multi-GPU or distributed setups. Extending GnnBench to these more complex system configurations would be an important next step.
- The workload suite, while diverse, may not capture all the nuances and performance characteristics of GNN models in real-world applications. Continuous expansion and refinement of the benchmark datasets and tasks will be needed as the field of GNNs evolves.
- The system-level profiling tools provided by GnnBench are a useful starting point, but more advanced analysis techniques, such as hardware performance counter analysis, could yield additional insights.
Additionally, it would be valuable for the authors to explore the potential impact of factors like model generalization and data characteristics on GNN performance, as these are known to be important considerations in the field of graph machine learning.
Conclusion
The GnnBench framework represents a significant advancement in the benchmarking of single-GPU GNN systems. By providing a standardized and comprehensive evaluation suite, it enables more fair and productive comparisons between different GNN models and implementations. The insights gained from GnnBench can help drive further optimization and innovation in the field of Graph Neural Networks, ultimately leading to more powerful and efficient AI systems that can tackle a wide range of real-world problems involving graph-structured data.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
GNNBENCH: Fair and Productive Benchmarking for Single-GPU GNN System
Yidong Gong, Pradeep Kumar
We hypothesize that the absence of a standardized benchmark has allowed several fundamental pitfalls in GNN System design and evaluation that the community has overlooked. In this work, we propose GNNBench, a plug-and-play benchmarking platform focused on system innovation. GNNBench presents a new protocol to exchange their captive tensor data, supports custom classes in System APIs, and allows automatic integration of the same system module to many deep learning frameworks, such as PyTorch and TensorFlow. To demonstrate the importance of such a benchmark framework, we integrated several GNN systems. Our results show that integration with GNNBench helped us identify several measurement issues that deserve attention from the community.
Read more4/8/2024
🧠
0
G4SATBench: Benchmarking and Advancing SAT Solving with Graph Neural Networks
Zhaoyu Li, Jinpei Guo, Xujie Si
Graph neural networks (GNNs) have recently emerged as a promising approach for solving the Boolean Satisfiability Problem (SAT), offering potential alternatives to traditional backtracking or local search SAT solvers. However, despite the growing volume of literature in this field, there remains a notable absence of a unified dataset and a fair benchmark to evaluate and compare existing approaches. To address this crucial gap, we present G4SATBench, the first benchmark study that establishes a comprehensive evaluation framework for GNN-based SAT solvers. In G4SATBench, we meticulously curate a large and diverse set of SAT datasets comprising 7 problems with 3 difficulty levels and benchmark a broad range of GNN models across various prediction tasks, training objectives, and inference algorithms. To explore the learning abilities and comprehend the strengths and limitations of GNN-based SAT solvers, we also compare their solving processes with the heuristics in search-based SAT solvers. Our empirical results provide valuable insights into the performance of GNN-based SAT solvers and further suggest that existing GNN models can effectively learn a solving strategy akin to greedy local search but struggle to learn backtracking search in the latent space. Our codebase is available at https://github.com/zhaoyu-li/G4SATBench.
Read more5/14/2024
0
Rethinking the Effectiveness of Graph Classification Datasets in Benchmarks for Assessing GNNs
Zhengdao Li, Yong Cao, Kefan Shuai, Yiming Miao, Kai Hwang
Graph classification benchmarks, vital for assessing and developing graph neural networks (GNNs), have recently been scrutinized, as simple methods like MLPs have demonstrated comparable performance. This leads to an important question: Do these benchmarks effectively distinguish the advancements of GNNs over other methodologies? If so, how do we quantitatively measure this effectiveness? In response, we first propose an empirical protocol based on a fair benchmarking framework to investigate the performance discrepancy between simple methods and GNNs. We further propose a novel metric to quantify the dataset effectiveness by considering both dataset complexity and model performance. To the best of our knowledge, our work is the first to thoroughly study and provide an explicit definition for dataset effectiveness in the graph learning area. Through testing across 16 real-world datasets, we found our metric to align with existing studies and intuitive assumptions. Finally, we explore the causes behind the low effectiveness of certain datasets by investigating the correlation between intrinsic graph properties and class labels, and we developed a novel technique supporting the correlation-controllable synthetic dataset generation. Our findings shed light on the current understanding of benchmark datasets, and our new platform could fuel the future evolution of graph classification benchmarks.
Read more7/9/2024
0
NoisyGL: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Graph Neural Networks under Label Noise
Zhonghao Wang, Danyu Sun, Sheng Zhou, Haobo Wang, Jiapei Fan, Longtao Huang, Jiajun Bu
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) exhibit strong potential in node classification task through a message-passing mechanism. However, their performance often hinges on high-quality node labels, which are challenging to obtain in real-world scenarios due to unreliable sources or adversarial attacks. Consequently, label noise is common in real-world graph data, negatively impacting GNNs by propagating incorrect information during training. To address this issue, the study of Graph Neural Networks under Label Noise (GLN) has recently gained traction. However, due to variations in dataset selection, data splitting, and preprocessing techniques, the community currently lacks a comprehensive benchmark, which impedes deeper understanding and further development of GLN. To fill this gap, we introduce NoisyGL in this paper, the first comprehensive benchmark for graph neural networks under label noise. NoisyGL enables fair comparisons and detailed analyses of GLN methods on noisy labeled graph data across various datasets, with unified experimental settings and interface. Our benchmark has uncovered several important insights that were missed in previous research, and we believe these findings will be highly beneficial for future studies. We hope our open-source benchmark library will foster further advancements in this field. The code of the benchmark can be found in https://github.com/eaglelab-zju/NoisyGL.
Read more6/10/2024