Games for Artificial Intelligence Research: A Review and Perspectives

Read original: arXiv:2304.13269 - Published 6/5/2024 by Chengpeng Hu, Yunlong Zhao, Ziqi Wang, Haocheng Du, Jialin Liu
Total Score

0

šŸ¤æ

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Games have long been a popular test-bed for artificial intelligence (AI) research, as they share many characteristics with real-world scenarios.
  • Areas of AI research that overlap with games include learning and optimization, decision-making in dynamic and uncertain environments, game theory, planning and scheduling, and creative design.
  • Numerous open-source games and game-based environments have been developed for studying AI, ranging from single-player to multi-player, collaborative to adversarial, and including platforms for creative design.
  • These games and platforms provide useful benchmarks for exploring and comparing AI ideas and techniques.

Plain English Explanation

Games have become a popular testing ground for AI research because they share many of the same characteristics as real-world situations that AI systems need to navigate. Things like learning and optimization, decision-making in uncertain environments, game theory, planning, and even creative design are all active areas of AI research that can be explored using games as a test bed.

Researchers have developed many different open-source games and game-based environments that can be used to study AI. These range from simple single-player games to complex multi-player games, including both collaborative and adversarial scenarios. Some of these platforms are also designed specifically for testing creative AI systems.

By using these game-based platforms, AI researchers can experiment with different techniques and ideas, and compare the performance of various AI approaches. The games serve as useful benchmarks for evaluating the capabilities of AI systems.

Technical Explanation

The paper reviews the various games and game-based platforms that have been developed for AI research. It discusses how these environments provide useful test-beds for studying AI in areas such as learning and optimization, decision-making in dynamic and uncertain conditions, game theory, planning and scheduling, and creative design.

The paper provides guidance on matching particular AI techniques and approaches with suitable games for testing and evaluation. It also discusses the research trends that have emerged as these game-based platforms have evolved over time.

Overall, the paper highlights the value of using game environments as benchmarks for advancing AI capabilities across a range of real-world relevant domains.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the use of games and game-based platforms for AI research. However, it does not delve deeply into the specific capabilities and limitations of the various game environments discussed. More details on the strengths and weaknesses of different game platforms in testing particular AI techniques would be helpful.

Additionally, the paper does not address potential biases or overfitting concerns that could arise when training AI systems exclusively on game-based data. There may be a risk of developing AI that performs well in game scenarios but struggles to generalize to real-world situations.

Further research is needed to explore the extent to which game-based AI performance translates to real-world problem-solving abilities. Careful validation and testing in diverse real-world scenarios should be a priority as the field of game-based AI research continues to evolve.

Conclusion

In summary, this paper highlights the valuable role that games and game-based platforms have played in advancing artificial intelligence research. By providing well-defined, dynamic environments for testing AI systems, these game-based test-beds have enabled researchers to explore a wide range of AI techniques and capabilities.

As the field of AI continues to progress, the insights gained from game-based research will likely become increasingly applicable to real-world challenges. However, it will be important to carefully consider the limitations of game-based testing and ensure that AI systems developed in this way can generalize effectively to diverse real-world scenarios.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on š• ā†’

Related Papers

šŸ¤æ

Total Score

0

Games for Artificial Intelligence Research: A Review and Perspectives

Chengpeng Hu, Yunlong Zhao, Ziqi Wang, Haocheng Du, Jialin Liu

Games have been the perfect test-beds for artificial intelligence research for the characteristics that widely exist in real-world scenarios. Learning and optimisation, decision making in dynamic and uncertain environments, game theory, planning and scheduling, design and education are common research areas shared between games and real-world problems. Numerous open-source games or game-based environments have been implemented for studying artificial intelligence. In addition to single- or multi-player, collaborative or adversarial games, there has also been growing interest in implementing platforms for creative design in recent years. Those platforms provide ideal benchmarks for exploring and comparing artificial intelligence ideas and techniques. This paper reviews the games and game-based platforms for artificial intelligence research, provides guidance on matching particular types of artificial intelligence with suitable games for testing and matching particular needs in games with suitable artificial intelligence techniques, discusses the research trend induced by the evolution of those games and platforms, and gives an outlook.

Read more

6/5/2024

Games of Knightian Uncertainty
Total Score

0

Games of Knightian Uncertainty

Spyridon Samothrakis, Dennis J. N. J. Soemers, Damian Machlanski

Arguably, for the latter part of the late 20th and early 21st centuries, games have been seen as the drosophila of AI. Games are a set of exciting testbeds, whose solutions (in terms of identifying optimal players) would lead to machines that would possess some form of general intelligence, or at the very least help us gain insights toward building intelligent machines. Following impressive successes in traditional board games like Go, Chess, and Poker, but also video games like the Atari 2600 collection, it is clear that this is not the case. Games have been attacked successfully, but we are nowhere near AGI developments (or, as harsher critics might say, useful AI developments!). In this short vision paper, we argue that for game research to become again relevant to the AGI pathway, we need to be able to address textit{Knightian uncertainty} in the context of games, i.e. agents need to be able to adapt to rapid changes in game rules on the fly with no warning, no previous data, and no model access.

Read more

6/28/2024

GPT for Games: A Scoping Review (2020-2023)
Total Score

0

GPT for Games: A Scoping Review (2020-2023)

Daijin Yang, Erica Kleinman, Casper Harteveld

This paper introduces a scoping review of 55 articles to explore GPT's potential for games, offering researchers a comprehensive understanding of the current applications and identifying both emerging trends and unexplored areas. We identify five key applications of GPT in current game research: procedural content generation, mixed-initiative game design, mixed-initiative gameplay, playing games, and game user research. Drawing from insights in each of these application areas, we propose directions for future research in each one. This review aims to lay the groundwork by illustrating the state of the art for innovative GPT applications in games, promising to enrich game development and enhance player experiences with cutting-edge AI innovations.

Read more

4/30/2024

šŸ‹ļø

Total Score

0

Designing Skill-Compatible AI: Methodologies and Frameworks in Chess

Karim Hamade, Reid McIlroy-Young, Siddhartha Sen, Jon Kleinberg, Ashton Anderson

Powerful artificial intelligence systems are often used in settings where they must interact with agents that are computationally much weaker, for example when they work alongside humans or operate in complex environments where some tasks are handled by algorithms, heuristics, or other entities of varying computational power. For AI agents to successfully interact in these settings, however, achieving superhuman performance alone is not sufficient; they also need to account for suboptimal actions or idiosyncratic style from their less-skilled counterparts. We propose a formal evaluation framework for assessing the compatibility of near-optimal AI with interaction partners who may have much lower levels of skill; we use popular collaborative chess variants as model systems to study and develop AI agents that can successfully interact with lower-skill entities. Traditional chess engines designed to output near-optimal moves prove to be inadequate partners when paired with engines of various lower skill levels in this domain, as they are not designed to consider the presence of other agents. We contribute three methodologies to explicitly create skill-compatible AI agents in complex decision-making settings, and two chess game frameworks designed to foster collaboration between powerful AI agents and less-skilled partners. On these frameworks, our agents outperform state-of-the-art chess AI (based on AlphaZero) despite being weaker in conventional chess, demonstrating that skill-compatibility is a tangible trait that is qualitatively and measurably distinct from raw performance. Our evaluations further explore and clarify the mechanisms by which our agents achieve skill-compatibility.

Read more

5/9/2024