Games of Knightian Uncertainty
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the potential of "games of Knightian uncertainty" as testbeds for advancing artificial general intelligence (AGI) research.
- Knightian uncertainty refers to situations where the probabilities of outcomes are unknown or unknowable, in contrast to situations of risk where probabilities can be quantified.
- The authors argue that games with Knightian uncertainty can serve as more appropriate and challenging environments for testing the capabilities of AGI systems compared to traditional games with known probability distributions.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses using games with Knightian uncertainty as testing grounds for advanced artificial intelligence (AI) systems. Knightian uncertainty refers to situations where the likelihood of different outcomes is unknown or impossible to determine precisely, unlike situations of "risk" where probabilities can be calculated.
The authors suggest that games with Knightian uncertainty may be better suited as testbeds for artificial general intelligence (AGI) compared to traditional games with well-defined probability distributions. This is because games with Knightian uncertainty pose more open-ended and ambiguous challenges that may better reflect the complexities of the real world, which AGI systems would need to navigate.
By testing AGI systems in these more uncertain and unpredictable game environments, researchers can gain insights into the systems' true capabilities and limitations. This could help advance the development of superhuman AI that can handle the uncertainty and complexity of the real world, rather than just excelling at games with known rules and payoffs.
Technical Explanation
The paper argues that games with Knightian uncertainty can serve as more appropriate and challenging testbeds for artificial general intelligence (AGI) research compared to traditional game environments. Knightian uncertainty refers to situations where the probabilities of outcomes are unknown or unknowable, as opposed to situations of "risk" where probabilities can be quantified.
The authors suggest that games with Knightian uncertainty pose more open-ended and ambiguous challenges that may better reflect the complexities of the real world, which AGI systems would need to navigate. By testing AGI systems in these more uncertain and unpredictable game environments, researchers can gain insights into the systems' true capabilities and limitations.
The paper discusses several examples of games with Knightian uncertainty, such as multi-player, symmetric games and games involving adaptive, multi-domain AI systems. The authors argue that these types of games can serve as more appropriate and challenging testbeds for advancing AGI research compared to traditional games with known probability distributions.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a compelling case for using games with Knightian uncertainty as testbeds for AGI research. The authors acknowledge that while traditional games have provided valuable insights, they may not adequately capture the complexity and uncertainty of the real world that AGI systems would need to navigate.
However, the paper does not delve into the practical challenges of implementing and evaluating AGI systems in these more ambiguous game environments. Designing and deploying such test environments may require significant resources and novel evaluation metrics that go beyond simple win/loss outcomes.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential limitations or risks associated with using games as proxies for real-world intelligence. While games with Knightian uncertainty may be more representative of reality, they may still oversimplify or fail to capture essential aspects of human-level cognition and decision-making.
Further research and discussion are needed to fully understand the merits and drawbacks of this approach, as well as to develop robust methodologies for leveraging games of Knightian uncertainty to advance AGI research in a responsible and reliable manner.
Conclusion
This paper presents a compelling argument for using games with Knightian uncertainty as testbeds for advancing artificial general intelligence (AGI) research. The authors suggest that these more ambiguous and unpredictable game environments can better reflect the complexities of the real world, providing a more appropriate and challenging testing ground for AGI systems compared to traditional games with known probability distributions.
By exploring AGI systems' performance in these Knightian uncertainty-based games, researchers can gain valuable insights into the systems' true capabilities and limitations, which could help drive the development of superhuman AI that can handle the uncertainty and complexity of the real world. While further research is needed to address the practical and conceptual challenges, this paper offers a promising direction for advancing AGI research and pushing the boundaries of what artificial intelligence can achieve.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Games of Knightian Uncertainty
Spyridon Samothrakis, Dennis J. N. J. Soemers, Damian Machlanski
Arguably, for the latter part of the late 20th and early 21st centuries, games have been seen as the drosophila of AI. Games are a set of exciting testbeds, whose solutions (in terms of identifying optimal players) would lead to machines that would possess some form of general intelligence, or at the very least help us gain insights toward building intelligent machines. Following impressive successes in traditional board games like Go, Chess, and Poker, but also video games like the Atari 2600 collection, it is clear that this is not the case. Games have been attacked successfully, but we are nowhere near AGI developments (or, as harsher critics might say, useful AI developments!). In this short vision paper, we argue that for game research to become again relevant to the AGI pathway, we need to be able to address textit{Knightian uncertainty} in the context of games, i.e. agents need to be able to adapt to rapid changes in game rules on the fly with no warning, no previous data, and no model access.
Read more6/28/2024
🤿
0
Games for Artificial Intelligence Research: A Review and Perspectives
Chengpeng Hu, Yunlong Zhao, Ziqi Wang, Haocheng Du, Jialin Liu
Games have been the perfect test-beds for artificial intelligence research for the characteristics that widely exist in real-world scenarios. Learning and optimisation, decision making in dynamic and uncertain environments, game theory, planning and scheduling, design and education are common research areas shared between games and real-world problems. Numerous open-source games or game-based environments have been implemented for studying artificial intelligence. In addition to single- or multi-player, collaborative or adversarial games, there has also been growing interest in implementing platforms for creative design in recent years. Those platforms provide ideal benchmarks for exploring and comparing artificial intelligence ideas and techniques. This paper reviews the games and game-based platforms for artificial intelligence research, provides guidance on matching particular types of artificial intelligence with suitable games for testing and matching particular needs in games with suitable artificial intelligence techniques, discusses the research trend induced by the evolution of those games and platforms, and gives an outlook.
Read more6/5/2024
📉
0
Universal Imitation Games
Sridhar Mahadevan
Alan Turing proposed in 1950 a framework called an imitation game to decide if a machine could think. Using mathematics developed largely after Turing -- category theory -- we analyze a broader class of universal imitation games (UIGs), which includes static, dynamic, and evolutionary games. In static games, the participants are in a steady state. In dynamic UIGs, learner participants are trying to imitate teacher participants over the long run. In evolutionary UIGs, the participants are competing against each other in an evolutionary game, and participants can go extinct and be replaced by others with higher fitness. We use the framework of category theory -- in particular, two influential results by Yoneda -- to characterize each type of imitation game. Universal properties in categories are defined by initial and final objects. We characterize dynamic UIGs where participants are learning by inductive inference as initial algebras over well-founded sets, and contrast them with participants learning by conductive inference over the final coalgebra of non-well-founded sets. We briefly discuss the extension of our categorical framework for UIGs to imitation games on quantum computers.
Read more5/6/2024
0
People use fast, goal-directed simulation to reason about novel games
Cedegao E. Zhang, Katherine M. Collins, Lionel Wong, Adrian Weller, Joshua B. Tenenbaum
We can evaluate features of problems and their potential solutions well before we can effectively solve them. When considering a game we have never played, for instance, we might infer whether it is likely to be challenging, fair, or fun simply from hearing the game rules, prior to deciding whether to invest time in learning the game or trying to play it well. Many studies of game play have focused on optimality and expertise, characterizing how people and computational models play based on moderate to extensive search and after playing a game dozens (if not thousands or millions) of times. Here, we study how people reason about a range of simple but novel connect-n style board games. We ask people to judge how fair and how fun the games are from very little experience: just thinking about the game for a minute or so, before they have ever actually played with anyone else, and we propose a resource-limited model that captures their judgments using only a small number of partial game simulations and almost no lookahead search.
Read more7/22/2024