GAN Inversion for Image Editing via Unsupervised Domain Adaptation

Overview

• Existing GAN inversion methods can reconstruct high-quality (HQ) images well, but struggle with more common low-quality (LQ) inputs.
• This paper proposes "Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (UDA) in the inversion process" (UDA-inversion) to effectively invert and edit both HQ and LQ images.
• UDA-inversion uses unpaired HQ images as the source domain and LQ images as the unlabeled target domain, with a theoretical guarantee that the loss value in the target domain is upper-bounded.
• This allows minimizing the upper bound to obtain accurate latent codes for both HQ and LQ images, without the need for supervision.
• UDA-Inversion achieves better PSNR on the FFHQ dataset compared to previous methods.

Plain English Explanation

The paper addresses a problem with existing techniques for inverting or "decoding" images generated by Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs). These GAN inversion methods work well when the input images are high-quality (HQ), but struggle when the input images are low-quality (LQ) - which are more common in practical applications.

To solve this, the researchers propose a new approach called "Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (UDA) in the inversion process" or "UDA-inversion." The key idea is to treat the HQ images as the "source domain" and the LQ images as the "unlabeled target domain." They then show theoretically that the loss (error) on the LQ target domain is upper-bounded by the loss on the HQ source domain, plus a measure of the difference between the two domains.

By minimizing this upper bound, the researchers can learn accurate latent codes (the internal representations) for both the HQ and LQ images, without needing any labeled LQ training data. In other words, the representations learned for the HQ images can be transformed to work well for the LQ images, in an unsupervised way.

This UDA-inversion approach allows the model to perform well on both HQ and LQ inputs, which is an important capability for practical applications of GAN inversion. The experiments show UDA-inversion achieves better performance than previous methods on a standard benchmark dataset.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes an Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (UDA) approach for GAN inversion, called UDA-inversion, to address the challenge of effectively inverting and editing both high-quality (HQ) and low-quality (LQ) images.

Existing GAN inversion methods are able to reconstruct HQ images well, but struggle with more common LQ inputs. To solve this, the researchers treat the HQ images as the "source domain" and the LQ images as the "unlabeled target domain" in a UDA setting. They introduce a theoretical guarantee that the loss value in the target domain is upper-bounded by the loss in the source domain, plus a novel discrepancy function measuring the difference between the two domains.

By minimizing this upper bound, the researchers can obtain accurate latent codes for both HQ and LQ images, without requiring any labeled LQ training data. The key insight is that the representations learned for the HQ source domain can be transformed to work well for the LQ target domain in an unsupervised manner.

The proposed UDA-Inversion approach is evaluated on the FFHQ dataset, where it achieves a better PSNR of 22.14 compared to previous methods. This demonstrates the effectiveness of the UDA-based inversion process in handling both HQ and LQ inputs effectively.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and promising approach to address the shortcomings of existing GAN inversion methods, which struggle with low-quality inputs. The theoretical guarantee provided for the upper bound on the target domain loss is an important contribution, as it allows the model to be trained without relying on labeled LQ data.

However, the paper does not discuss potential limitations or caveats of the UDA-inversion approach. For example, it is unclear how the method would perform on more diverse or challenging datasets beyond FFHQ, or how sensitive the approach is to the specific choice of discrepancy function between the source and target domains.

Additionally, the paper could have provided more insights into the underlying reasons why the representations learned for HQ images can be effectively transformed to work well for LQ images in an unsupervised manner. A deeper exploration of this domain adaptation process could lead to further improvements or extensions of the UDA-inversion technique.

Overall, the paper presents a solid and well-executed piece of research, but there are opportunities to further explore the limitations, generalizability, and broader implications of the proposed approach. Readers are encouraged to think critically about the assumptions and design choices made, and consider how the UDA-inversion method could be extended or improved upon in future work.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel Unsupervised Domain Adaptation (UDA) approach for GAN inversion, called UDA-inversion, to effectively handle both high-quality (HQ) and low-quality (LQ) input images. By treating HQ images as the source domain and LQ images as the unlabeled target domain, the researchers show a theoretical guarantee that allows minimizing an upper bound on the target domain loss.

This unsupervised domain adaptation process enables the model to learn accurate latent codes for both HQ and LQ images, without requiring any labeled LQ training data. Experiments on the FFHQ dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of UDA-inversion, which achieves better performance than previous GAN inversion methods.

The proposed UDA-inversion technique is a significant step forward in making GAN inversion more robust and practical for real-world applications, where low-quality inputs are common. The insights and theoretical guarantees provided in this work could also inspire further research into unsupervised domain adaptation approaches for other computer vision and generative modeling tasks.