Gender Differences in Class Participation in Online versus In-Person Core CS Courses

Overview

• The COVID-19 pandemic forced many post-secondary classes to shift from in-person to online formats.
• This study analyzes how this transition impacted the gender gap in student participation scores and attitudes.
• The researchers used student participation data from computer science classes and student survey responses to investigate these changes.

Plain English Explanation

The COVID-19 pandemic significantly changed how college students received their education. Many classes shifted from being held in-person to being held online. This study looked at how this transition affected the differences in participation between male and female students.

The researchers used participation scores from computer science classes to compare student participation in in-person and online classes. They also analyzed survey responses from students in the online classes to understand what might be driving changes in participation.

The key finding was that in in-person classes, male students tended to have higher participation scores on average and dominated the top scores. But in online classes, male and female students participated at about the same rate overall. The survey responses suggested that when classes were online, students of both genders were less likely to compare themselves to their peers, but this tendency was much more pronounced for female students.

This data indicates that the differences in participation habits observed in typical in-person classes are likely not inherent gender differences, but rather a product of the classroom environment. The researchers argue it is crucial for the education community to investigate the root causes of these behavioral differences and experiment with ways to mitigate them before a return to primarily in-person learning.

Technical Explanation

The researchers used student participation scores from two core computer science classes across ten in-person and three online quarters at a public research university. They analyzed this data to determine whether the shift to primarily asynchronous online learning impacted the gender gap in student participation and students' attitudes towards themselves and their peers.

In the in-person classes, the researchers observed that male students scored higher on average and dominated the top participation scores. However, in the online classes, male and female students participated at approximately the same rate across the entire class.

To understand the factors driving these changes in participation behavior, the researchers analyzed survey responses from over a quarter of the students enrolled in the online classes. They found that students of both genders tended to compare themselves to their peers less when classes were online. Importantly, this trend was much more accentuated for female students.

Critical Analysis

The researchers acknowledge several limitations in their study. The participation data was limited to two core computer science classes at a single university, so the findings may not generalize to other subject areas or educational contexts. Additionally, the survey responses only provided insight into student attitudes, but did not directly measure the underlying causes of the observed changes in participation behavior.

Further research is needed to investigate the specific mechanisms driving the gender differences in participation, both in in-person and online class formats. The researchers suggest exploring factors such as differences in writing style, the role of gender bias in course evaluations, and the effectiveness of interventions to challenge negative gender stereotypes.

Conclusion

This study provides valuable insights into how the shift to online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic impacted gender differences in student participation. The key finding is that the observed gaps in participation in traditional in-person classes are likely not inherent to gender, but rather a product of the classroom environment.

These results underscore the importance of the education community investigating the root causes of these behavioral differences and experimenting with ways to mitigate them, especially as many institutions consider a return to primarily in-person instruction. By doing so, we can work towards creating more equitable learning environments for all students.