Generalizing Liquid Democracy to multi-agent delegation: A Voting Power Measure and Equilibrium Analysis
0
📈
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Proposes a generalization of the classic liquid democracy model
- Allows fractional delegation of voting weight while maintaining equilibrium states
- Introduces a penalty mechanism for delegation chain length
- Explores the presence of equilibrium states in the proposed delegation game
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents an expanded version of the classic liquid democracy model. In liquid democracy, voters can choose to either cast their own vote directly or delegate their vote to a representative they trust. The new model builds on this by allowing voters to split their vote and delegate fractions of it to multiple representatives. This gives voters more flexibility in how they participate.
However, the researchers found that this added flexibility can lead to very long chains of delegated votes, which reduces the overall effectiveness of the system. To address this, they introduced a penalty that increases with the length of the delegation chain. This encourages voters to keep their delegations more direct and focused.
The researchers then analyzed the properties of this new model, including whether it could reach stable "equilibrium" states where the system settles and doesn't keep changing. They found that imposing the delegation chain penalty helps the model achieve these desirable equilibrium states, in contrast with the original liquid democracy approach.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a generalization of the classic liquid democracy model that allows fractional vote delegation. This means voters can split their vote and allocate portions to different representatives, rather than having to delegate their entire vote.
To discourage overly long delegation chains, the researchers introduce a penalty factor that increases with the length of the delegation path. They analyze the properties of this modified model, proving that smaller penalty factors bring the system closer to satisfying important criteria like monotonicity and consistency.
The paper then explores the presence of pure strategy Nash equilibria in the delegation game enabled by the new voting measure. Unlike the classical liquid democracy model, the researchers demonstrate that their generalized approach can exhibit stable equilibrium states, but only when the delegation chain penalty is enforced.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable extension to the liquid democracy concept, addressing limitations around vote delegation fragmentation. The introduction of the delegation chain penalty is a clever mechanism to encourage more direct and accountable representation.
However, the analysis is limited to theoretical properties and does not explore practical implementation challenges. Real-world deployment would likely face issues around voter education, gaming of the penalty system, and the difficulty of defining appropriate penalty factors.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential concerns around voter privacy and the concentration of power with a small number of highly-delegated representatives. Further research is needed to understand the societal implications of this voting model at scale.
Conclusion
This research proposes an intriguing generalization of liquid democracy that enhances voter flexibility while maintaining system stability. The key innovation is the delegation chain penalty, which helps the model achieve desirable equilibrium states. While the theoretical foundations are sound, practical implementation and broader societal impacts require further exploration. Overall, the work offers a constructive step forward in the ongoing quest for more empowering and accountable democratic systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📈
0
Generalizing Liquid Democracy to multi-agent delegation: A Voting Power Measure and Equilibrium Analysis
Francisco M. Bersetche
In this study, we propose a generalization of the classic model of liquid democracy that allows fractional delegation of voting weight, while simultaneously allowing for the existence of equilibrium states. Our approach empowers agents to partition and delegate their votes to multiple representatives, all while retaining a fraction of the voting power for themselves. We introduce a penalty mechanism for the length of delegation chains. We discuss the desirable properties of a reasonable generalization of the classic model, and prove that smaller penalty factors bring the model closer to satisfying these properties. In the subsequent section, we explore the presence of equilibrium states in a general delegation game utilizing the proposed voting measure. In contrast to the classical model, we demonstrate that this game exhibits pure strategy Nash equilibria, contingent upon the imposition of a penalty on the length of delegation chains.
Read more4/3/2024
🔄
0
Decentralized Learning in General-sum Markov Games
Chinmay Maheshwari, Manxi Wu, Shankar Sastry
The Markov game framework is widely used to model interactions among agents with heterogeneous utilities in dynamic, uncertain, societal-scale systems. In these settings, agents typically operate in a decentralized manner due to privacy and scalability concerns, often without knowledge of others' strategies. Designing decentralized learning algorithms that provably converge to rational outcomes remains challenging, especially beyond Markov zero-sum and potential games, which do not fully capture the mixed cooperative-competitive nature of real-world interactions. Our paper focuses on designing decentralized learning algorithms for general-sum Markov games, aiming to provide guarantees of convergence to approximate Nash equilibria. We introduce a Markov Near-Potential Function (MNPF), and show that MNPF plays a central role in the analysis of convergence of an actor-critic-based decentralized learning dynamics to approximate Nash equilibria. Our analysis leverages the two-timescale nature of actor-critic algorithms, where Q-function updates occur faster than policy updates. This result is further strengthened under certain regularity conditions and when the set of Nash equilibria is finite. Our findings provide a new perspective on the analysis of decentralized learning in multi-agent systems, addressing the complexities of real-world interactions.
Read more9/17/2024
0
FedQV: Leveraging Quadratic Voting in Federated Learning
Tianyue Chu, Nikolaos Laoutaris
Federated Learning (FL) permits different parties to collaboratively train a global model without disclosing their respective local labels. A crucial step of FL, that of aggregating local models to produce the global one, shares many similarities with public decision-making, and elections in particular. In that context, a major weakness of FL, namely its vulnerability to poisoning attacks, can be interpreted as a consequence of the one person one vote (henceforth 1p1v) principle underpinning most contemporary aggregation rules. In this paper, we propose FedQV, a novel aggregation algorithm built upon the quadratic voting scheme, recently proposed as a better alternative to 1p1v-based elections. Our theoretical analysis establishes that FedQV is a truthful mechanism in which bidding according to one's true valuation is a dominant strategy that achieves a convergence rate that matches those of state-of-the-art methods. Furthermore, our empirical analysis using multiple real-world datasets validates the superior performance of FedQV against poisoning attacks. It also shows that combining FedQV with unequal voting ``budgets'' according to a reputation score increases its performance benefits even further. Finally, we show that FedQV can be easily combined with Byzantine-robust privacy-preserving mechanisms to enhance its robustness against both poisoning and privacy attacks.
Read more4/10/2024
📊
0
Delegating Data Collection in Decentralized Machine Learning
Nivasini Ananthakrishnan, Stephen Bates, Michael I. Jordan, Nika Haghtalab
Motivated by the emergence of decentralized machine learning (ML) ecosystems, we study the delegation of data collection. Taking the field of contract theory as our starting point, we design optimal and near-optimal contracts that deal with two fundamental information asymmetries that arise in decentralized ML: uncertainty in the assessment of model quality and uncertainty regarding the optimal performance of any model. We show that a principal can cope with such asymmetry via simple linear contracts that achieve 1-1/e fraction of the optimal utility. To address the lack of a priori knowledge regarding the optimal performance, we give a convex program that can adaptively and efficiently compute the optimal contract. We also study linear contracts and derive the optimal utility in the more complex setting of multiple interactions.
Read more5/3/2024