Generating Harder Cross-document Event Coreference Resolution Datasets using Metaphoric Paraphrasing

Overview

• This paper introduces a novel approach for generating harder datasets for cross-document event coreference resolution (CDECR) using metaphoric paraphrasing.
• CDECR is the task of determining whether event mentions across multiple documents refer to the same real-world event.
• The authors argue that existing CDECR datasets lack diversity and are not sufficiently challenging, hindering the development of more robust CDECR models.
• To address this, they propose a metaphoric paraphrasing technique to augment existing datasets, creating more linguistically diverse and ambiguous event descriptions.

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on the problem of cross-document event coreference resolution (CDECR). This is the task of figuring out whether different mentions of events across multiple documents are referring to the same real-world event. For example, if one document says "The president gave a speech" and another says "The leader addressed the nation," the system should recognize that these are describing the same event.

The authors argue that existing CDECR datasets lack diversity and are not challenging enough, which makes it difficult to develop robust CDECR models. To fix this, they propose a new technique called "metaphoric paraphrasing" to generate more diverse and ambiguous event descriptions. This involves taking existing event descriptions and rewriting them using metaphors and other figurative language.

For instance, instead of "The president gave a speech," the system might generate "The leader took the stage and unleashed a torrent of words." This makes the event description more complex and harder for the CDECR system to interpret, better testing its capabilities.

By creating these more challenging datasets, the authors hope to spur the development of CDECR models that are better able to handle the nuances and ambiguities of real-world event descriptions across documents.

Technical Explanation

The key technical contribution of this paper is a novel data augmentation approach for generating harder CDECR datasets. The authors start with existing CDECR datasets, such as CDECR and CDCR, and apply a metaphoric paraphrasing technique to introduce more linguistic diversity and ambiguity.

Specifically, they use a pre-trained language model to generate metaphoric paraphrases of event descriptions. This involves identifying the key semantic components of an event (e.g., the agent, action, patient) and then replacing them with more figurative language. For example, "The president gave a speech" might become "The leader unleashed a torrent of words."

The authors evaluate the efficacy of this approach by measuring the performance of state-of-the-art CDECR models on the original and augmented datasets. They find that the models exhibit a significant drop in performance on the augmented datasets, indicating that the metaphoric paraphrasing has indeed created more challenging examples.

Additionally, the authors conduct a human evaluation to assess the linguistic diversity and ambiguity of the generated paraphrases. The results show that the paraphrases are rated as more diverse and ambiguous than the original event descriptions, supporting the authors' claims about the efficacy of their approach.

Critical Analysis

The authors present a compelling approach for generating harder CDECR datasets, which is an important step in driving progress in this field. By introducing more linguistic diversity and ambiguity, the augmented datasets can help uncover weaknesses in existing CDECR models and spur the development of more robust and generalizable systems.

That said, the authors acknowledge several limitations of their work. First, the metaphoric paraphrasing technique is not fully automated and requires some manual curation to ensure the generated paraphrases are coherent and meaningful. This could limit the scalability of the approach.

Additionally, the authors note that their evaluation focused on the linguistic properties of the generated paraphrases, rather than their semantic correctness. It's possible that some of the paraphrases could introduce unintended changes in meaning, which could undermine the usefulness of the augmented datasets for CDECR model training and evaluation.

Further research is needed to address these limitations and explore other data augmentation techniques for CDECR. For example, enhancing cross-document event coreference resolution by incorporating world knowledge or using a rationale-centric counterfactual data augmentation method could also help create more challenging and diverse CDECR datasets.

Conclusion

This paper presents an innovative approach for generating harder CDECR datasets using metaphoric paraphrasing. The authors demonstrate that this technique can effectively introduce more linguistic diversity and ambiguity, posing greater challenges for state-of-the-art CDECR models.

By making CDECR datasets more challenging, this work has the potential to drive significant progress in the field, leading to the development of more robust and generalizable event coreference resolution systems. These systems could have far-reaching applications in areas like natural language understanding, information extraction, and knowledge base construction.

Overall, this paper makes an important contribution to the CDECR literature and provides a promising direction for future research in this area.