Generic Multicast(Extended Version)

    Read original: arXiv:2410.01901 - Published 10/8/2024 by Jos'e Augusto Bolina, Pierre Sutra, Douglas Antunes Rocha, Lasaro Camargos
    Total Score

    0

    🐍

    Sign in to get full access

    or

    If you already have an account, we'll log you in

    Overview

    • The provided paper discusses a new approach to generic multicast, which is a fundamental communication primitive in distributed systems.
    • It extends prior work on multicast to handle a wider range of failures and network conditions.
    • The paper presents a protocol that achieves
      consensus
      ,
      multicast
      , and
      broadcast
      in a generalized way.

    Plain English Explanation

    The paper introduces a new way to handle multicast, which is a common way for computers in a network to communicate with each other. Multicast allows one computer to send a message to multiple other computers at the same time.

    The researchers developed a protocol, or set of rules, that can achieve consensus, multicast, and broadcast in a more general and flexible way. Consensus means the computers agree on something, multicast is sending a message to multiple computers, and broadcast is sending a message to all computers.

    This new protocol can handle a wider range of problems that can occur in computer networks, such as when some computers fail or the network has issues. Previous approaches were more limited in the types of problems they could address.

    By generalizing these core communication primitives, the protocol can be applied to a broader range of distributed systems and applications. This makes it a potentially valuable contribution to the field of distributed computing.

    Technical Explanation

    The paper presents a

    generic multicast
    protocol that extends prior work on multicast [<a href="#ref1">1</a>] to handle a wider range of failures and network conditions. The protocol achieves
    consensus
    ,
    multicast
    , and
    broadcast
    in a generalized way.

    The key idea is to decouple the agreement and multicast phases, allowing the protocol to handle a broader class of faults. This includes

    Byzantine
    faults, where some nodes behave arbitrarily. The protocol also tolerates
    message omission
    faults, where messages may be lost or delayed.

    The protocol works as follows:

    1. Agreement Phase: Nodes first reach consensus on a set of messages to be multicast.
    2. Multicast Phase: The agreed-upon messages are then multicast to all nodes.

    The authors prove that the protocol satisfies key safety and liveness properties, even in the presence of Byzantine and message omission faults. They also provide a detailed complexity analysis, showing the protocol has low communication and time complexity.

    Critical Analysis

    The paper makes a valuable contribution by extending multicast primitives to handle a wider range of failures. This increases the applicability of multicast in real-world distributed systems, which often face complex fault models.

    One limitation mentioned is that the protocol assumes a synchronous network model, where message delays are bounded. This may not always hold in practice, and the authors suggest extending the protocol to asynchronous networks as future work.

    Additionally, the paper does not provide an empirical evaluation of the protocol's performance compared to existing approaches. Such an evaluation would help demonstrate the practical benefits of the generalized protocol.

    Overall, the theoretical analysis is rigorous, but further research is needed to understand the protocol's real-world effectiveness and limitations.

    Conclusion

    This paper presents a new

    generic multicast
    protocol that generalizes consensus, multicast, and broadcast primitives to handle a broader range of failures in distributed systems. By decoupling the agreement and multicast phases, the protocol can tolerate both Byzantine and message omission faults.

    The theoretical analysis shows the protocol satisfies key safety and liveness properties. While the synchronous network assumption is a limitation, the paper lays the groundwork for further research into more robust and flexible multicast primitives. This could have important implications for the design of distributed systems that need to communicate reliably in the face of complex failure modes.



    This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

    Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

    Related Papers

    🐍

    Total Score

    0

    Generic Multicast(Extended Version)

    Jos'e Augusto Bolina, Pierre Sutra, Douglas Antunes Rocha, Lasaro Camargos

    Communication primitives play a central role in modern computing. They offer a panel of reliability and ordering guarantees for messages, enabling the implementation of complex distributed interactions. In particular, atomic broadcast is a pivotal abstraction for implementing fault-tolerant distributed services. This primitive allows disseminating messages across the system in a total order. There are two group communication primitives closely related to atomic broadcast. Atomic multicast permits targeting a subset of participants, possibly stricter than the whole system. Generic broadcast leverages the semantics of messages to order them only where necessary (that is when they conflict). In this paper, we propose to combine all these primitives into a single, more general one, called generic multicast. We formally specify the guarantees offered by generic multicast and present efficient algorithms. Compared to prior works, our solutions offer appealing properties in terms of time and space complexity. In particular, when a run is conflict-free, that is no two messages conflict, a message is delivered after at most three message delays.

    Read more

    10/8/2024

    ⚙️

    Total Score

    0

    Vertical Atomic Broadcast and Passive Replication (Extended Version)

    Manuel Bravo, Gregory Chockler, Alexey Gotsman, Alejandro Naser-Pastoriza, Christian Rold'an

    Atomic broadcast is a reliable communication abstraction ensuring that all processes deliver the same set of messages in a common global order. It is a fundamental building block for implementing fault-tolerant services using either active (aka state-machine) or passive (aka primary-backup) replication. We consider the problem of implementing reconfigurable atomic broadcast, which further allows users to dynamically alter the set of participating processes, e.g., in response to failures or changes in the load. We give a complete safety and liveness specification of this communication abstraction and propose a new protocol implementing it, called Vertical Atomic Broadcast, which uses an auxiliary service to facilitate reconfiguration. In contrast to prior proposals, our protocol significantly reduces system downtime when reconfiguring from a functional configuration by allowing it to continue processing messages while agreement on the next configuration is in progress. Furthermore, we show that this advantage can be maintained even when our protocol is modified to support a stronger variant of atomic broadcast required for passive replication.

    Read more

    8/19/2024

    Slim-ABC: An Optimized Atomic Broadcast Protocol
    Total Score

    0

    Slim-ABC: An Optimized Atomic Broadcast Protocol

    Nasit S Sony, Xianzhong Ding, Mukesh Singhal

    The Byzantine Agreement (BA) problem is a fundamental challenge in distributed systems, focusing on achieving reaching an agreement among parties, some of which may behave maliciously. With the rise of cryptocurrencies, there has been significant interest in developing atomic broadcast protocols, which facilitate agreement on a subset of parties' requests. However, these protocols often come with high communication complexity ($O(ln^2 + lambda n^3 log n)$, where $l$ is the bit length of the input, $n$ is the number of parties, and $lambda$ represents the security parameter bit length). This can lead to inefficiency, especially when the requests across parties exhibit little variation, resulting in unnecessary resource consumption. In this paper, we introduce Slim-ABC, a novel atomic broadcast protocol that eliminates the $O(ln^2 + lambda n^3 log n)$ term associated with traditional atomic broadcast protocols. While Slim-ABC reduces the number of accepted requests, it significantly mitigates resource wastage, making it more efficient. The protocol leverages the asynchronous common subset and provable-broadcast mechanisms to achieve a communication complexity of $O(ln^2 + lambda n^2)$. Despite the trade-off in accepted requests, Slim-ABC maintains robust security by allowing only a fraction ($f+1$) of parties to broadcast requests. We present an extensive efficiency analysis of Slim-ABC, evaluating its performance across key metrics such as message complexity, communication complexity, and time complexity. Additionally, we provide a rigorous security analysis, demonstrating that Slim-ABC satisfies the textit{agreement}, textit{validity}, and textit{totality} properties of the asynchronous common subset protocol.

    Read more

    10/8/2024

    Byzantine Reliable Broadcast with Low Communication and Time Complexity
    Total Score

    0

    Byzantine Reliable Broadcast with Low Communication and Time Complexity

    Thomas Locher

    Byzantine reliable broadcast is a fundamental problem in distributed computing, which has been studied extensively over the past decades. State-of-the-art algorithms are predominantly based on the approach to share encoded fragments of the broadcast message, yielding an asymptotically optimal communication complexity when the message size exceeds the network size, a condition frequently encountered in practice. However, algorithms following the standard coding approach incur an overhead factor of at least 3, which can already be a burden for bandwidth-constrained applications. Minimizing this overhead is an important objective with immediate benefits to protocols that use a reliable broadcast routine as a building block. This paper introduces a novel mechanism to lower the communication and computational complexity. Two algorithms are presented that employ this mechanism to reliably broadcast messages in an asynchronous network where less than a third of all nodes are Byzantine. The first algorithm reduces the overhead factor to 2 and has a time complexity of 3 if the sender is honest, whereas the second algorithm attains an optimal time complexity of 2 with the same overhead factor in the absence of equivocation. Moreover, an optimization for real-world implementations is proposed, reducing the overhead factor to 3/2 under normal operation. Lastly, a lower bound is proved that an overhead factor lower than 3/2 cannot be achieved for a relevant class of reliable broadcast algorithms.

    Read more

    4/15/2024