GlitchBench: Can large multimodal models detect video game glitches?
2312.05291
0
0
🚀
Abstract
Large multimodal models (LMMs) have evolved from large language models (LLMs) to integrate multiple input modalities, such as visual inputs. This integration augments the capacity of LLMs for tasks requiring visual comprehension and reasoning. However, the extent and limitations of their enhanced abilities are not fully understood, especially when it comes to real-world tasks. To address this gap, we introduce GlitchBench, a novel benchmark derived from video game quality assurance tasks, to test and evaluate the reasoning capabilities of LMMs. Our benchmark is curated from a variety of unusual and glitched scenarios from video games and aims to challenge both the visual and linguistic reasoning powers of LMMs in detecting and interpreting out-of-the-ordinary events. We evaluate multiple state-of-the-art LMMs, and we show that GlitchBench presents a new challenge for these models. Code and data are available at: https://glitchbench.github.io/
Create account to get full access
The paper introduces GlitchBench, a novel benchmark derived from video game quality assurance tasks. This benchmark aims to test and evaluate the reasoning capabilities of large multimodal models (LMMs) that integrate visual inputs with language models. While LMMs have enhanced abilities for tasks requiring visual comprehension and reasoning compared to language models, their extent and limitations are not fully understood, especially in real-world scenarios.
GlitchBench is curated from a variety of unusual and glitched scenarios from video games, challenging the visual and linguistic reasoning powers of LMMs in detecting and interpreting out-of-the-ordinary events. The authors evaluate multiple state-of-the-art LMMs on this benchmark, demonstrating that it presents a new challenge for these models. The code and data for GlitchBench are available at https://glitchbench.github.io/.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
FakeBench: Uncover the Achilles' Heels of Fake Images with Large Multimodal Models
Yixuan Li, Xuelin Liu, Xiaoyang Wang, Shiqi Wang, Weisi Lin
0
0
Recently, fake images generated by artificial intelligence (AI) models have become indistinguishable from the real, exerting new challenges for fake image detection models. To this extent, simple binary judgments of real or fake seem less convincing and credible due to the absence of human-understandable explanations. Fortunately, Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) bring possibilities to materialize the judgment process while their performance remains undetermined. Therefore, we propose FakeBench, the first-of-a-kind benchmark towards transparent defake, consisting of fake images with human language descriptions on forgery signs. FakeBench gropes for two open questions of LMMs: (1) can LMMs distinguish fake images generated by AI, and (2) how do LMMs distinguish fake images? In specific, we construct the FakeClass dataset with 6k diverse-sourced fake and real images, each equipped with a Question&Answer pair concerning the authenticity of images, which are utilized to benchmark the detection ability. To examine the reasoning and interpretation abilities of LMMs, we present the FakeClue dataset, consisting of 15k pieces of descriptions on the telltale clues revealing the falsification of fake images. Besides, we construct the FakeQA to measure the LMMs' open-question answering ability on fine-grained authenticity-relevant aspects. Our experimental results discover that current LMMs possess moderate identification ability, preliminary interpretation and reasoning ability, and passable open-question answering ability for image defake. The FakeBench will be made publicly available soon.
4/23/2024
A-Bench: Are LMMs Masters at Evaluating AI-generated Images?
Zicheng Zhang, Haoning Wu, Chunyi Li, Yingjie Zhou, Wei Sun, Xiongkuo Min, Zijian Chen, Xiaohong Liu, Weisi Lin, Guangtao Zhai
0
0
How to accurately and efficiently assess AI-generated images (AIGIs) remains a critical challenge for generative models. Given the high costs and extensive time commitments required for user studies, many researchers have turned towards employing large multi-modal models (LMMs) as AIGI evaluators, the precision and validity of which are still questionable. Furthermore, traditional benchmarks often utilize mostly natural-captured content rather than AIGIs to test the abilities of LMMs, leading to a noticeable gap for AIGIs. Therefore, we introduce A-Bench in this paper, a benchmark designed to diagnose whether LMMs are masters at evaluating AIGIs. Specifically, A-Bench is organized under two key principles: 1) Emphasizing both high-level semantic understanding and low-level visual quality perception to address the intricate demands of AIGIs. 2) Various generative models are utilized for AIGI creation, and various LMMs are employed for evaluation, which ensures a comprehensive validation scope. Ultimately, 2,864 AIGIs from 16 text-to-image models are sampled, each paired with question-answers annotated by human experts, and tested across 18 leading LMMs. We hope that A-Bench will significantly enhance the evaluation process and promote the generation quality for AIGIs. The benchmark is available at https://github.com/Q-Future/A-Bench.
6/6/2024
VisualWebBench: How Far Have Multimodal LLMs Evolved in Web Page Understanding and Grounding?
Junpeng Liu, Yifan Song, Bill Yuchen Lin, Wai Lam, Graham Neubig, Yuanzhi Li, Xiang Yue
0
0
Multimodal Large Language models (MLLMs) have shown promise in web-related tasks, but evaluating their performance in the web domain remains a challenge due to the lack of comprehensive benchmarks. Existing benchmarks are either designed for general multimodal tasks, failing to capture the unique characteristics of web pages, or focus on end-to-end web agent tasks, unable to measure fine-grained abilities such as OCR, understanding, and grounding. In this paper, we introduce bench{}, a multimodal benchmark designed to assess the capabilities of MLLMs across a variety of web tasks. bench{} consists of seven tasks, and comprises 1.5K human-curated instances from 139 real websites, covering 87 sub-domains. We evaluate 14 open-source MLLMs, Gemini Pro, Claude-3 series, and GPT-4V(ision) on bench{}, revealing significant challenges and performance gaps. Further analysis highlights the limitations of current MLLMs, including inadequate grounding in text-rich environments and subpar performance with low-resolution image inputs. We believe bench{} will serve as a valuable resource for the research community and contribute to the creation of more powerful and versatile MLLMs for web-related applications.
4/10/2024
MMBench: Is Your Multi-modal Model an All-around Player?
Yuan Liu, Haodong Duan, Yuanhan Zhang, Bo Li, Songyang Zhang, Wangbo Zhao, Yike Yuan, Jiaqi Wang, Conghui He, Ziwei Liu, Kai Chen, Dahua Lin
0
0
Large vision-language models have recently achieved remarkable progress, exhibiting great perception and reasoning abilities concerning visual information. However, how to effectively evaluate these large vision-language models remains a major obstacle, hindering future model development. Traditional benchmarks like VQAv2 or COCO Caption provide quantitative performance measurements but suffer from a lack of fine-grained ability assessment and non-robust evaluation metrics. Recent subjective benchmarks, such as OwlEval, offer comprehensive evaluations of a model's abilities by incorporating human labor, but they are not scalable and display significant bias. In response to these challenges, we propose MMBench, a novel multi-modality benchmark. MMBench methodically develops a comprehensive evaluation pipeline, primarily comprised of two elements. The first element is a meticulously curated dataset that surpasses existing similar benchmarks in terms of the number and variety of evaluation questions and abilities. The second element introduces a novel CircularEval strategy and incorporates the use of ChatGPT. This implementation is designed to convert free-form predictions into pre-defined choices, thereby facilitating a more robust evaluation of the model's predictions. MMBench is a systematically-designed objective benchmark for robustly evaluating the various abilities of vision-language models. We hope MMBench will assist the research community in better evaluating their models and encourage future advancements in this domain. Project page: https://opencompass.org.cn/mmbench.
4/30/2024