The global landscape of academic guidelines for generative AI and Large Language Models
2406.18842
0
0
š¤
Abstract
The integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) in academia has spurred a global discourse on their potential pedagogical benefits and ethical considerations. Positive reactions highlight some potential, such as collaborative creativity, increased access to education, and empowerment of trainers and trainees. However, negative reactions raise concerns about ethical complexities, balancing innovation and academic integrity, unequal access, and misinformation risks. Through a systematic survey and text-mining-based analysis of global and national directives, insights from independent research, and eighty university-level guidelines, this study provides a nuanced understanding of the opportunities and challenges posed by GAI and LLMs in education. It emphasizes the importance of balanced approaches that harness the benefits of these technologies while addressing ethical considerations and ensuring equitable access and educational outcomes. The paper concludes with recommendations for fostering responsible innovation and ethical practices to guide the integration of GAI and LLMs in academia.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines the integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) in academia, exploring their potential benefits and ethical considerations.
- It highlights both positive and negative reactions to the use of these technologies in education, including collaborative creativity, increased access to education, and empowerment of trainers and trainees, as well as concerns about ethical complexities, balancing innovation and academic integrity, unequal access, and misinformation risks.
- The study provides a comprehensive analysis of global and national directives, independent research, and university-level guidelines to offer a nuanced understanding of the opportunities and challenges posed by GAI and LLMs in education.
- The paper emphasizes the importance of balanced approaches that harness the benefits of these technologies while addressing ethical considerations and ensuring equitable access and educational outcomes.
- It concludes with recommendations for fostering responsible innovation and ethical practices to guide the integration of GAI and LLMs in academia.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses the growing use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) in education. These technologies have the potential to offer benefits like helping students and teachers work together more creatively, making education more accessible, and empowering both teachers and students. However, they also raise concerns about ethical issues, maintaining academic integrity, ensuring equal access, and the risk of spreading misinformation.
The researchers analyzed global and national policies, independent studies, and university guidelines to get a well-rounded understanding of both the pros and cons of using these technologies in education. The key takeaway is that we need to find a balanced approach ā one that allows us to harness the benefits of GAI and LLMs while also addressing the ethical challenges and ensuring everyone has fair access to these tools.
The paper concludes with recommendations for how to responsibly and ethically integrate these AI technologies into academic settings.
Technical Explanation
The study uses a systematic survey and text-mining-based analysis to examine the integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) in academia. It draws insights from global and national directives, independent research, and eighty university-level guidelines.
The researchers identified both positive and negative reactions to the use of GAI and LLMs in education. On the positive side, they found potential benefits such as collaborative creativity, increased access to education, and empowerment of trainers and trainees. However, the negative reactions raised concerns about ethical complexities, balancing innovation and academic integrity, unequal access, and misinformation risks.
Based on this nuanced understanding, the paper emphasizes the importance of balanced approaches that harness the benefits of these technologies while addressing the ethical considerations and ensuring equitable access and educational outcomes. The study concludes with recommendations for fostering responsible innovation and ethical practices to guide the integration of GAI and LLMs in academia.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and balanced analysis of the opportunities and challenges presented by the integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) in education. It acknowledges the potential benefits of these technologies, such as increased collaboration and creativity, improved access to education, and empowerment of both teachers and students. However, it also rightly highlights the ethical complexities, concerns about academic integrity, issues of unequal access, and the risks of misinformation that come with the use of these technologies in academic settings.
One potential limitation of the study is that it relies heavily on global and national directives, as well as university-level guidelines, which may not fully capture the diverse perspectives and lived experiences of all stakeholders, such as students, educators, and marginalized communities. Additionally, the study does not delve deeply into the specific technical capabilities and limitations of GAI and LLMs, which could provide valuable insights into the practical implications of their use in education.
Overall, the paper offers a thoughtful and nuanced perspective on the integration of GAI and LLMs in academia. It encourages readers to think critically about the potential benefits and challenges, and to consider the ethical and equity-related implications of these technologies in educational settings. Further research that incorporates a wider range of stakeholder perspectives and a more detailed technical analysis could help strengthen the recommendations for responsible and ethical practices in this rapidly evolving field.
Conclusion
This study provides a comprehensive examination of the integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) in academia, exploring both the potential benefits and the ethical concerns. By analyzing global and national directives, independent research, and university guidelines, the researchers offer a nuanced understanding of the opportunities and challenges posed by these technologies in educational settings.
The key takeaway is the need for a balanced approach that allows us to harness the benefits of GAI and LLMs, such as increased collaboration, improved access to education, and empowerment of trainers and trainees, while also addressing the ethical complexities, maintaining academic integrity, ensuring equitable access, and mitigating the risks of misinformation.
The paper concludes with recommendations for fostering responsible innovation and ethical practices to guide the integration of GAI and LLMs in academia. As these technologies continue to evolve and become more prevalent in educational settings, it will be crucial for stakeholders to work together to develop balanced and inclusive approaches that prioritize the well-being of all students and educators.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
š
Navigating LLM Ethics: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Directions
Junfeng Jiao, Saleh Afroogh, Yiming Xu, Connor Phillips
0
0
This study addresses ethical issues surrounding Large Language Models (LLMs) within the field of artificial intelligence. It explores the common ethical challenges posed by both LLMs and other AI systems, such as privacy and fairness, as well as ethical challenges uniquely arising from LLMs. It highlights challenges such as hallucination, verifiable accountability, and decoding censorship complexity, which are unique to LLMs and distinct from those encountered in traditional AI systems. The study underscores the need to tackle these complexities to ensure accountability, reduce biases, and enhance transparency in the influential role that LLMs play in shaping information dissemination. It proposes mitigation strategies and future directions for LLM ethics, advocating for interdisciplinary collaboration. It recommends ethical frameworks tailored to specific domains and dynamic auditing systems adapted to diverse contexts. This roadmap aims to guide responsible development and integration of LLMs, envisioning a future where ethical considerations govern AI advancements in society.
7/1/2024
Deconstructing The Ethics of Large Language Models from Long-standing Issues to New-emerging Dilemmas
Chengyuan Deng, Yiqun Duan, Xin Jin, Heng Chang, Yijun Tian, Han Liu, Henry Peng Zou, Yiqiao Jin, Yijia Xiao, Yichen Wang, Shenghao Wu, Zongxing Xie, Kuofeng Gao, Sihong He, Jun Zhuang, Lu Cheng, Haohan Wang
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved unparalleled success across diverse language modeling tasks in recent years. However, this progress has also intensified ethical concerns, impacting the deployment of LLMs in everyday contexts. This paper provides a comprehensive survey of ethical challenges associated with LLMs, from longstanding issues such as copyright infringement, systematic bias, and data privacy, to emerging problems like truthfulness and social norms. We critically analyze existing research aimed at understanding, examining, and mitigating these ethical risks. Our survey underscores integrating ethical standards and societal values into the development of LLMs, thereby guiding the development of responsible and ethically aligned language models.
6/11/2024
š
Evaluating the Capabilities of LLMs for Supporting Anticipatory Impact Assessment
Mowafak Allaham, Nicholas Diakopoulos
0
0
Gaining insight into the potential negative impacts of emerging Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in society is a challenge for implementing anticipatory governance approaches. One approach to produce such insight is to use Large Language Models (LLMs) to support and guide experts in the process of ideating and exploring the range of undesirable consequences of emerging technologies. However, performance evaluations of LLMs for such tasks are still needed, including examining the general quality of generated impacts but also the range of types of impacts produced and resulting biases. In this paper, we demonstrate the potential for generating high-quality and diverse impacts of AI in society by fine-tuning completion models (GPT-3 and Mistral-7B) on a diverse sample of articles from news media and comparing those outputs to the impacts generated by instruction-based (GPT-4 and Mistral-7B-Instruct) models. We examine the generated impacts for coherence, structure, relevance, and plausibility and find that the generated impacts using Mistral-7B, a small open-source model fine-tuned on impacts from the news media, tend to be qualitatively on par with impacts generated using a more capable and larger scale model such as GPT-4. Moreover, we find that impacts produced by instruction-based models had gaps in the production of certain categories of impacts in comparison to fine-tuned models. This research highlights a potential bias in the range of impacts generated by state-of-the-art LLMs and the potential of aligning smaller LLMs on news media as a scalable alternative to generate high quality and more diverse impacts in support of anticipatory governance approaches.
5/22/2024
Global Data Constraints: Ethical and Effectiveness Challenges in Large Language Model
Jin Yang, Zhiqiang Wang, Yanbin Lin, Zunduo Zhao
0
0
The efficacy and ethical integrity of large language models (LLMs) are profoundly influenced by the diversity and quality of their training datasets. However, the global landscape of data accessibility presents significant challenges, particularly in regions with stringent data privacy laws or limited open-source information. This paper examines the multifaceted challenges associated with acquiring high-quality training data for LLMs, focusing on data scarcity, bias, and low-quality content across various linguistic contexts. We highlight the technical and ethical implications of relying on publicly available but potentially biased or irrelevant data sources, which can lead to the generation of biased or hallucinatory content by LLMs. Through a series of evaluations using GPT-4 and GPT-4o, we demonstrate how these data constraints adversely affect model performance and ethical alignment. We propose and validate several mitigation strategies designed to enhance data quality and model robustness, including advanced data filtering techniques and ethical data collection practices. Our findings underscore the need for a proactive approach in developing LLMs that considers both the effectiveness and ethical implications of data constraints, aiming to foster the creation of more reliable and universally applicable AI systems.
6/18/2024