Global News Synchrony and Diversity During the Start of the COVID-19 Pandemic
2405.00280
0
0
Abstract
News coverage profoundly affects how countries and individuals behave in international relations. Yet, we have little empirical evidence of how news coverage varies across countries. To enable studies of global news coverage, we develop an efficient computational methodology that comprises three components: (i) a transformer model to estimate multilingual news similarity; (ii) a global event identification system that clusters news based on a similarity network of news articles; and (iii) measures of news synchrony across countries and news diversity within a country, based on country-specific distributions of news coverage of the global events. Each component achieves state-of-the art performance, scaling seamlessly to massive datasets of millions of news articles. We apply the methodology to 60 million news articles published globally between January 1 and June 30, 2020, across 124 countries and 10 languages, detecting 4357 news events. We identify the factors explaining diversity and synchrony of news coverage across countries. Our study reveals that news media tend to cover a more diverse set of events in countries with larger Internet penetration, more official languages, larger religious diversity, higher economic inequality, and larger populations. Coverage of news events is more synchronized between countries that not only actively participate in commercial and political relations -- such as, pairs of countries with high bilateral trade volume, and countries that belong to the NATO military alliance or BRICS group of major emerging economies -- but also countries that share certain traits: an official language, high GDP, and high democracy indices.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Examines how global news coverage and public attention synchronized during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic
- Analyzes the diversity of news coverage across different countries and languages
- Provides insights into the dynamics of global information flow and agenda-setting processes during a major crisis
Plain English Explanation
This study looks at how news coverage and public interest around the world were aligned or differed during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. By analyzing news articles and online engagement data across multiple countries and languages, the researchers gained insights into how information spread and what topics captured global attention during this major global event.
The study on scaling up multilingual news framing analysis and the dataset on unveiling global narratives from multilingual Twitter and news provide relevant context and complementary approaches for understanding news dynamics during crises. Additionally, the research on local perceptions and practices of news sharing and fake news and the analysis of transnational network dynamics of problematic information diffusion offer valuable perspectives on the complex interplay of global and local factors shaping information flows.
Technical Explanation
The researchers collected a large dataset of news articles and online engagement data from over 60 countries and 20 languages during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic. They used natural language processing and network analysis techniques to quantify the level of synchrony and diversity in news coverage and public attention across this global dataset.
The analysis reveals that while there was a high degree of global synchrony in terms of the topics and events that received widespread media coverage, there were also significant differences in how these issues were framed and discussed across different countries and language communities. The research on social links versus language barriers in decoding global information flows provides further context on the interplay of social and linguistic factors in shaping the transmission of information.
The findings offer insights into the complex dynamics of global agenda-setting and information diffusion during a major crisis, highlighting both the unifying and diversifying forces at play.
Critical Analysis
The study provides a nuanced and data-driven perspective on the global information landscape during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the authors acknowledge that their analysis is limited to the initial stages of the crisis, and the patterns observed may have evolved over time as the pandemic progressed. Additionally, the reliance on news media and online engagement data, while providing valuable insights, may not fully capture the diversity of information sources and communication channels utilized by the public.
Further research could explore how the dynamics of global news synchrony and diversity vary across different types of crises, or how they are influenced by factors such as geopolitical tensions, technological changes, or the actions of key social and political actors. Expanding the geographical and linguistic scope of the analysis, as well as incorporating additional data sources, could also yield a more comprehensive understanding of these complex phenomena.
Conclusion
This study offers a unique perspective on the global information landscape during the COVID-19 pandemic, shedding light on the interplay of synchrony and diversity in news coverage and public attention. The findings contribute to our understanding of agenda-setting processes and the flow of information during major crises, with potential implications for policymakers, journalists, and researchers interested in navigating the challenges of a rapidly evolving global media environment.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
š¬
Large language models for sentiment analysis of newspaper articles during COVID-19: The Guardian
Rohitash Chandra, Baicheng Zhu, Qingying Fang, Eka Shinjikashvili
0
0
During the COVID-19 pandemic, the news media coverage encompassed a wide range of topics that includes viral transmission, allocation of medical resources, and government response measures. There have been studies on sentiment analysis of social media platforms during COVID-19 to understand the public response given the rise of cases and government strategies implemented to control the spread of the virus. Sentiment analysis can provide a better understanding of changes in societal opinions and emotional trends during the pandemic. Apart from social media, newspapers have played a vital role in the dissemination of information, including information from the government, experts, and also the public about various topics. A study of sentiment analysis of newspaper sources during COVID-19 for selected countries can give an overview of how the media covered the pandemic. In this study, we select The Guardian newspaper and provide a sentiment analysis during various stages of COVID-19 that includes initial transmission, lockdowns and vaccination. We employ novel large language models (LLMs) and refine them with expert-labelled sentiment analysis data. We also provide an analysis of sentiments experienced pre-pandemic for comparison. The results indicate that during the early pandemic stages, public sentiment prioritised urgent crisis response, later shifting focus to addressing the impact on health and the economy. In comparison with related studies about social media sentiment analyses, we found a discrepancy between The Guardian with dominance of negative sentiments (sad, annoyed, anxious and denial), suggesting that social media offers a more diversified emotional reflection. We found a grim narrative in The Guardian with overall dominance of negative sentiments, pre and during COVID-19 across news sections including Australia, UK, World News, and Opinion
5/24/2024
šØāš«
Connecting the Dots in News Analysis: Bridging the Cross-Disciplinary Disparities in Media Bias and Framing
Gisela Vallejo, Timothy Baldwin, Lea Frermann
0
0
The manifestation and effect of bias in news reporting have been central topics in the social sciences for decades, and have received increasing attention in the NLP community recently. While NLP can help to scale up analyses or contribute automatic procedures to investigate the impact of biased news in society, we argue that methodologies that are currently dominant fall short of addressing the complex questions and effects addressed in theoretical media studies. In this survey paper, we review social science approaches and draw a comparison with typical task formulations, methods, and evaluation metrics used in the analysis of media bias in NLP. We discuss open questions and suggest possible directions to close identified gaps between theory and predictive models, and their evaluation. These include model transparency, considering document-external information, and cross-document reasoning rather than single-label assignment.
6/21/2024
A Study on Scaling Up Multilingual News Framing Analysis
Syeda Sabrina Akter, Antonios Anastasopoulos
0
0
Media framing is the study of strategically selecting and presenting specific aspects of political issues to shape public opinion. Despite its relevance to almost all societies around the world, research has been limited due to the lack of available datasets and other resources. This study explores the possibility of dataset creation through crowdsourcing, utilizing non-expert annotators to develop training corpora. We first extend framing analysis beyond English news to a multilingual context (12 typologically diverse languages) through automatic translation. We also present a novel benchmark in Bengali and Portuguese on the immigration and same-sex marriage domains. Additionally, we show that a system trained on our crowd-sourced dataset, combined with other existing ones, leads to a 5.32 percentage point increase from the baseline, showing that crowdsourcing is a viable option. Last, we study the performance of large language models (LLMs) for this task, finding that task-specific fine-tuning is a better approach than employing bigger non-specialized models.
4/3/2024
Unveiling Global Narratives: A Multilingual Twitter Dataset of News Media on the Russo-Ukrainian Conflict
Sherzod Hakimov, Gullal S. Cheema
0
0
The ongoing Russo-Ukrainian conflict has been a subject of intense media coverage worldwide. Understanding the global narrative surrounding this topic is crucial for researchers that aim to gain insights into its multifaceted dimensions. In this paper, we present a novel multimedia dataset that focuses on this topic by collecting and processing tweets posted by news or media companies on social media across the globe. We collected tweets from February 2022 to May 2023 to acquire approximately 1.5 million tweets in 60 different languages along with their images. Each entry in the dataset is accompanied by processed tags, allowing for the identification of entities, stances, textual or visual concepts, and sentiment. The availability of this multimedia dataset serves as a valuable resource for researchers aiming to investigate the global narrative surrounding the ongoing conflict from various aspects such as who are the prominent entities involved, what stances are taken, where do these stances originate from, how are the different textual and visual concepts related to the event portrayed.
4/9/2024