Local Perceptions and Practices of News Sharing and Fake News
2010.07607
0
0
🛠️
Abstract
Fake news is a prevalent problem, particularly in digital media, that undermines trust and cooperation among people. As a variety of global mitigation efforts arise, the understanding of how people consider fake news becomes important, especially in local contexts. To that end, we carried out a survey with 75 participants in Singapore to understand people's perceptions of and practices with news (real and fake). Locally, fake news was found to be more pervasive in instant messaging apps than in social media, with the problem attributed more strongly to sharing than to creation. Good news sharing practices were generally observed. Highest trust was reported in government communication platforms across 11 media items. These results show that Singapore possesses a peculiar sociocultural scene, suggesting that efforts directed towards locally relevant measures may be more effective in addressing fake news in Singapore. We detail the survey results and recommended directions in this paper.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Fake news is a pervasive problem in digital media that undermines trust and cooperation among people
- Researchers conducted a survey with 75 participants in Singapore to understand people's perceptions and practices around fake news
- The study found that fake news is more prevalent in instant messaging apps than social media, with sharing being a bigger issue than creation
- Participants reported the highest trust in government communication platforms for news
Plain English Explanation
Fake news, or the spread of false or misleading information, is a serious issue, especially online. It can erode people's trust in the information they see and make it harder for people to work together. Researchers in Singapore wanted to better understand how people in their country view and deal with fake news.
They surveyed 75 people in Singapore to get their insights. The study found that fake news seems to be more common on instant messaging apps than on social media platforms. The bigger problem was people sharing fake news, rather than creating it in the first place.
Overall, the participants reported good practices when it came to sharing news, like verifying information before passing it on. They also said they trusted news coming from government communication channels the most, out of 11 different media sources.
These findings suggest that Singapore has a unique social and cultural landscape when it comes to fake news. This means efforts to address the problem may need to be tailored to the local context to be most effective.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted a survey with 75 participants in Singapore to better understand people's perceptions and practices around real and fake news. They found that fake news was more prevalent in instant messaging apps than on social media platforms. Participants attributed the fake news problem more to the sharing of misinformation rather than its original creation.
Overall, the survey respondents reported generally good news sharing practices, such as verifying information before passing it on. Across 11 different media items, the highest trust was placed in government communication platforms.
These results indicate that Singapore has a distinct sociocultural landscape when it comes to fake news. This suggests that efforts to address the problem may be more effective if they are tailored to the local context, rather than relying on generic, one-size-fits-all solutions.
Critical Analysis
The study provides valuable insights into how fake news is perceived and handled in the local context of Singapore. However, it is limited by its relatively small sample size of 75 participants. Expanding the survey to include a larger and more diverse population could help validate the findings and uncover additional nuances.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the specific factors that contribute to the prevalence of fake news in instant messaging apps versus social media. Further research may be needed to understand the underlying reasons for this difference and develop targeted interventions.
While the high trust in government communication platforms is an interesting finding, it would be beneficial to explore why this is the case and whether there are any potential biases or limitations in this perception. Investigating the dynamics of political information sources could provide additional context.
Overall, this study offers a valuable starting point for understanding the fake news landscape in Singapore, but more research is needed to fully address the complex challenges posed by the spread of misinformation and develop effective, locally-relevant solutions.
Conclusion
This survey-based study provides insights into how people in Singapore perceive and deal with fake news. The researchers found that fake news is more prevalent in instant messaging apps than on social media, and that the sharing of misinformation is a bigger issue than its original creation.
Participants reported generally good news sharing practices and the highest trust in government communication platforms. These findings suggest that Singapore has a unique sociocultural landscape when it comes to fake news, which may require tailored approaches to effectively address the problem.
While the study offers a valuable starting point, further research with larger and more diverse samples could help validate the findings and uncover additional nuances. Exploring the factors contributing to the differences between instant messaging and social media, as well as the reasons for the high trust in government sources, could also provide valuable insights for developing targeted interventions to combat the spread of fake news in Singapore and beyond.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
👁️
Online search is more likely to lead students to validate true news than to refute false ones
Azza Bouleimen, Luca Luceri, Felipe Cardoso, Luca Botturi, Martin Hermida, Loredana Addimando, Chiara Beretta, Marzia Galloni, Silvia Giordano
0
0
With the spread of high-speed Internet and portable smart devices, the way people access and consume information has drastically changed. However, this presents many challenges, including information overload, personal data leakage, and misinformation diffusion. Across the spectrum of risks that Internet users face nowadays, this work focuses on understanding how young people perceive and deal with false information. Within an experimental campaign involving 183 students, we presented six different news items to the participants and invited them to browse the Internet to assess the veracity of the presented information. Our results suggest that online search is more likely to lead students to validate true news than to refute false ones. We found that students change their opinion about a specific piece of information more often than their global idea about a broader topic. Also, our experiment reflected that most participants rely on online sources to obtain information and access the news, and those getting information from books and Internet browsing are the most accurate in assessing the veracity of a news item. This work provides a principled understanding of how young people perceive and distinguish true and false pieces of information, identifying strengths and weaknesses amidst young subjects and contributing to building tailored digital information literacy strategies for youth.
5/8/2024
Exposing and Explaining Fake News On-the-Fly
Francisco de Arriba-P'erez, Silvia Garc'ia-M'endez, F'atima Leal, Benedita Malheiro, Juan Carlos Burguillo
0
0
Social media platforms enable the rapid dissemination and consumption of information. However, users instantly consume such content regardless of the reliability of the shared data. Consequently, the latter crowdsourcing model is exposed to manipulation. This work contributes with an explainable and online classification method to recognize fake news in real-time. The proposed method combines both unsupervised and supervised Machine Learning approaches with online created lexica. The profiling is built using creator-, content- and context-based features using Natural Language Processing techniques. The explainable classification mechanism displays in a dashboard the features selected for classification and the prediction confidence. The performance of the proposed solution has been validated with real data sets from Twitter and the results attain 80 % accuracy and macro F-measure. This proposal is the first to jointly provide data stream processing, profiling, classification and explainability. Ultimately, the proposed early detection, isolation and explanation of fake news contribute to increase the quality and trustworthiness of social media contents.
5/14/2024
🏷️
An Interactive Framework for Profiling News Media Sources
Nikhil Mehta, Dan Goldwasser
0
0
The recent rise of social media has led to the spread of large amounts of fake and biased news, content published with the intent to sway beliefs. While detecting and profiling the sources that spread this news is important to maintain a healthy society, it is challenging for automated systems. In this paper, we propose an interactive framework for news media profiling. It combines the strengths of graph based news media profiling models, Pre-trained Large Language Models, and human insight to characterize the social context on social media. Experimental results show that with as little as 5 human interactions, our framework can rapidly detect fake and biased news media, even in the most challenging settings of emerging news events, where test data is unseen.
4/30/2024
🤖
Blessing or curse? A survey on the Impact of Generative AI on Fake News
Alexander Loth, Martin Kappes, Marc-Oliver Pahl
0
0
Fake news significantly influence our society. They impact consumers, voters, and many other societal groups. While Fake News exist for a centuries, Generative AI brings fake news on a new level. It is now possible to automate the creation of masses of high-quality individually targeted Fake News. On the other end, Generative AI can also help detecting Fake News. Both fields are young but developing fast. This survey provides a comprehensive examination of the research and practical use of Generative AI for Fake News detection and creation in 2024. Following the Structured Literature Survey approach, the paper synthesizes current results in the following topic clusters 1) enabling technologies, 2) creation of Fake News, 3) case study social media as most relevant distribution channel, 4) detection of Fake News, and 5) deepfakes as upcoming technology. The article also identifies current challenges and open issues.
4/5/2024