GNNAnatomy: Systematic Generation and Evaluation of Multi-Level Explanations for Graph Neural Networks
2406.04548
0
0
Abstract
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have proven highly effective in various machine learning (ML) tasks involving graphs, such as node/graph classification and link prediction. However, explaining the decisions made by GNNs poses challenges because of the aggregated relational information based on graph structure, leading to complex data transformations. Existing methods for explaining GNNs often face limitations in systematically exploring diverse substructures and evaluating results in the absence of ground truths. To address this gap, we introduce GNNAnatomy, a model- and dataset-agnostic visual analytics system designed to facilitate the generation and evaluation of multi-level explanations for GNNs. In GNNAnatomy, we employ graphlets to elucidate GNN behavior in graph-level classification tasks. By analyzing the associations between GNN classifications and graphlet frequencies, we formulate hypothesized factual and counterfactual explanations. To validate a hypothesized graphlet explanation, we introduce two metrics: (1) the correlation between its frequency and the classification confidence, and (2) the change in classification confidence after removing this substructure from the original graph. To demonstrate the effectiveness of GNNAnatomy, we conduct case studies on both real-world and synthetic graph datasets from various domains. Additionally, we qualitatively compare GNNAnatomy with a state-of-the-art GNN explainer, demonstrating the utility and versatility of our design.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces "GNNAnatomy", a systematic approach for generating and evaluating multi-level explanations for graph neural networks (GNNs).
- The authors propose a framework that can produce various types of explanations, from low-level structural insights to high-level semantic interpretations, to help users understand the inner workings of GNNs.
- They also introduce novel evaluation metrics to assess the quality and usefulness of these explanations, going beyond traditional approaches that focus only on model performance.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores ways to make graph neural networks (GNNs) more understandable. GNNs are a type of machine learning model that can analyze and make predictions on data represented as networks or graphs, such as social networks or chemical structures. However, GNNs can be complex and "black box" models, meaning it's often difficult to understand how they arrive at their predictions.
The researchers developed a system called "GNNAnatomy" that can generate different types of explanations for how a GNN model works. These explanations range from low-level details about the specific graph structures the model is focusing on, to higher-level interpretations of the model's reasoning. The goal is to provide users, such as scientists or business analysts, with a better understanding of how GNNs make their decisions.
The authors also created new ways to evaluate the quality and usefulness of these explanations, going beyond just measuring the model's overall accuracy. This is important because an explanation that is technically accurate may not necessarily be easy for a human to understand or find meaningful.
By making GNNs more transparent and interpretable, the researchers hope to build trust in these powerful machine learning models and enable users to apply them more effectively in real-world problems involving interconnected data.
Technical Explanation
The core of the GNNAnatomy framework is the systematic generation of multi-level explanations for GNN models. This builds on prior work that has highlighted the need for more interpretable GNN models.
At the low level, the authors use the concept of "graphlets" - small, recurring patterns within the input graph structure - to generate explanations that highlight the specific subgraph structures a GNN model is focusing on to make its predictions. This relates to techniques like GraphFrameX that also leverage graph-based explanations.
At higher levels, the framework can produce more semantic, concept-based explanations that describe the model's reasoning in terms of domain-specific knowledge or abstract graph properties. This connects to work on developing additive, human-understandable GNN models and design requirements for human-centered GNN explanations.
The authors also introduce new evaluation metrics to assess the quality of these explanations, going beyond just model performance. For example, they measure how well the explanations align with human intuitions and domain knowledge, and how much they actually enhance user understanding of the model.
Critical Analysis
The GNNAnatomy framework represents a promising step towards making GNN models more transparent and interpretable. The multi-level explanation approach, spanning low-level structural insights and high-level semantic interpretations, provides a comprehensive toolkit for understanding the inner workings of these complex models.
However, the paper does not address the potential for these explanations to be misleading or "fragile", as prior research has shown. There may be cases where the explanations focus on spurious correlations or fail to capture the true reasoning behind a GNN's predictions.
Additionally, the evaluation of explanation quality is still an open challenge. While the authors introduce new metrics, assessing the usefulness and human-interpretability of explanations remains a subjective and context-dependent task. More work may be needed to develop robust, generalizable evaluation frameworks.
Finally, the authors do not discuss the computational and memory overhead of generating these multi-level explanations, which could be a practical concern for deploying GNNAnatomy in real-world applications with large or complex graph datasets.
Conclusion
The GNNAnatomy framework represents an important step towards making graph neural networks more transparent and explainable. By systematically generating multi-level explanations, from low-level structural insights to high-level semantic interpretations, the authors provide a powerful toolkit for understanding how GNNs make their decisions.
The novel evaluation metrics introduced in this work also highlight the importance of going beyond just model performance when assessing the quality and usefulness of explanations. As GNNs become more widely adopted, this type of interpretability and human-centered design will be crucial for building trust and enabling effective real-world applications.
While the GNNAnatomy approach has some limitations and open challenges, it serves as a valuable contribution to the growing field of explainable artificial intelligence for graph-structured data.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🧠
GraphFramEx: Towards Systematic Evaluation of Explainability Methods for Graph Neural Networks
Kenza Amara, Rex Ying, Zitao Zhang, Zhihao Han, Yinan Shan, Ulrik Brandes, Sebastian Schemm, Ce Zhang
0
0
As one of the most popular machine learning models today, graph neural networks (GNNs) have attracted intense interest recently, and so does their explainability. Users are increasingly interested in a better understanding of GNN models and their outcomes. Unfortunately, today's evaluation frameworks for GNN explainability often rely on few inadequate synthetic datasets, leading to conclusions of limited scope due to a lack of complexity in the problem instances. As GNN models are deployed to more mission-critical applications, we are in dire need for a common evaluation protocol of explainability methods of GNNs. In this paper, we propose, to our best knowledge, the first systematic evaluation framework for GNN explainability, considering explainability on three different user needs. We propose a unique metric that combines the fidelity measures and classifies explanations based on their quality of being sufficient or necessary. We scope ourselves to node classification tasks and compare the most representative techniques in the field of input-level explainability for GNNs. For the inadequate but widely used synthetic benchmarks, surprisingly shallow techniques such as personalized PageRank have the best performance for a minimum computation time. But when the graph structure is more complex and nodes have meaningful features, gradient-based methods are the best according to our evaluation criteria. However, none dominates the others on all evaluation dimensions and there is always a trade-off. We further apply our evaluation protocol in a case study for frauds explanation on eBay transaction graphs to reflect the production environment.
5/24/2024
🧠
L2XGNN: Learning to Explain Graph Neural Networks
Giuseppe Serra, Mathias Niepert
0
0
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are a popular class of machine learning models. Inspired by the learning to explain (L2X) paradigm, we propose L2XGNN, a framework for explainable GNNs which provides faithful explanations by design. L2XGNN learns a mechanism for selecting explanatory subgraphs (motifs) which are exclusively used in the GNNs message-passing operations. L2XGNN is able to select, for each input graph, a subgraph with specific properties such as being sparse and connected. Imposing such constraints on the motifs often leads to more interpretable and effective explanations. Experiments on several datasets suggest that L2XGNN achieves the same classification accuracy as baseline methods using the entire input graph while ensuring that only the provided explanations are used to make predictions. Moreover, we show that L2XGNN is able to identify motifs responsible for the graph's properties it is intended to predict.
6/17/2024
Graph Neural Network Explanations are Fragile
Jiate Li, Meng Pang, Yun Dong, Jinyuan Jia, Binghui Wang
0
0
Explainable Graph Neural Network (GNN) has emerged recently to foster the trust of using GNNs. Existing GNN explainers are developed from various perspectives to enhance the explanation performance. We take the first step to study GNN explainers under adversarial attack--We found that an adversary slightly perturbing graph structure can ensure GNN model makes correct predictions, but the GNN explainer yields a drastically different explanation on the perturbed graph. Specifically, we first formulate the attack problem under a practical threat model (i.e., the adversary has limited knowledge about the GNN explainer and a restricted perturbation budget). We then design two methods (i.e., one is loss-based and the other is deduction-based) to realize the attack. We evaluate our attacks on various GNN explainers and the results show these explainers are fragile.
6/6/2024
Explainable Graph Neural Networks Under Fire
Zhong Li, Simon Geisler, Yuhang Wang, Stephan Gunnemann, Matthijs van Leeuwen
0
0
Predictions made by graph neural networks (GNNs) usually lack interpretability due to their complex computational behavior and the abstract nature of graphs. In an attempt to tackle this, many GNN explanation methods have emerged. Their goal is to explain a model's predictions and thereby obtain trust when GNN models are deployed in decision critical applications. Most GNN explanation methods work in a post-hoc manner and provide explanations in the form of a small subset of important edges and/or nodes. In this paper we demonstrate that these explanations can unfortunately not be trusted, as common GNN explanation methods turn out to be highly susceptible to adversarial perturbations. That is, even small perturbations of the original graph structure that preserve the model's predictions may yield drastically different explanations. This calls into question the trustworthiness and practical utility of post-hoc explanation methods for GNNs. To be able to attack GNN explanation models, we devise a novel attack method dubbed textit{GXAttack}, the first textit{optimization-based} adversarial attack method for post-hoc GNN explanations under such settings. Due to the devastating effectiveness of our attack, we call for an adversarial evaluation of future GNN explainers to demonstrate their robustness.
6/11/2024