Explainable Graph Neural Networks Under Fire
2406.06417
0
0
Abstract
Predictions made by graph neural networks (GNNs) usually lack interpretability due to their complex computational behavior and the abstract nature of graphs. In an attempt to tackle this, many GNN explanation methods have emerged. Their goal is to explain a model's predictions and thereby obtain trust when GNN models are deployed in decision critical applications. Most GNN explanation methods work in a post-hoc manner and provide explanations in the form of a small subset of important edges and/or nodes. In this paper we demonstrate that these explanations can unfortunately not be trusted, as common GNN explanation methods turn out to be highly susceptible to adversarial perturbations. That is, even small perturbations of the original graph structure that preserve the model's predictions may yield drastically different explanations. This calls into question the trustworthiness and practical utility of post-hoc explanation methods for GNNs. To be able to attack GNN explanation models, we devise a novel attack method dubbed textit{GXAttack}, the first textit{optimization-based} adversarial attack method for post-hoc GNN explanations under such settings. Due to the devastating effectiveness of our attack, we call for an adversarial evaluation of future GNN explainers to demonstrate their robustness.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines the fragility and limitations of explainable graph neural networks (GNNs), which aim to provide interpretable explanations for their predictions.
- The authors highlight the challenges in developing robust and reliable explanations for GNN models, and propose several directions for future research to address these issues.
- The paper builds on recent work in the field of explainable AI for graph neural networks, multi-level GNN explanations, and proxy graph generation for GNN explanations.
Plain English Explanation
Graph neural networks (GNNs) are a type of machine learning model that can analyze and make predictions based on data represented as a graph, with nodes and connections between them. Explainable GNNs are models that can also provide interpretable explanations for their predictions, to help users understand how the model arrived at a particular output.
However, this paper argues that these explainable GNN models are often fragile and limited in their ability to provide reliable and robust explanations. The authors highlight several key challenges, such as the sensitivity of explanations to small changes in the input graph, the difficulty in generating representative proxy graphs for explaining the model's reasoning, and the lack of systematic evaluation frameworks to assess the quality and consistency of GNN explanations.
The paper suggests that addressing these issues will require a more holistic approach to designing human-centered GNN systems, which prioritize the needs and understanding of end-users, rather than solely focusing on optimizing model performance. This could involve developing new evaluation metrics, better integration of human feedback, and more transparent and interactive explanation interfaces.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by providing a overview of graph neural networks (GNNs) and the importance of developing explainable models in this domain. The authors then highlight several key challenges with existing approaches to explainable GNNs:
-
Explanation Fragility: The explanations provided by GNNs can be highly sensitive to small changes in the input graph, leading to drastically different explanations for similar inputs. This undermines the reliability and trustworthiness of the explanations.
-
Proxy Graph Generation: Generating representative proxy graphs to explain a GNN's reasoning is difficult, as the distribution of real-world graphs can be complex and difficult to capture accurately.
-
Lack of Systematic Evaluation: There is a lack of standardized evaluation frameworks and metrics to assess the quality, consistency, and usefulness of GNN explanations, making it hard to compare different explainability approaches.
To address these issues, the authors propose several directions for future research, including:
- Developing more robust and stable explanation methods that are less sensitive to input perturbations.
- Designing better proxy graph generation techniques that can capture the underlying graph distribution more faithfully.
- Establishing comprehensive evaluation protocols and benchmark datasets to systematically assess the performance of explainable GNN models.
- Adopting a more human-centered design approach, where the needs and understanding of end-users are prioritized in the development of explainable GNN systems.
The paper concludes by highlighting the importance of addressing these challenges to unlock the full potential of explainable GNNs and build trust in their use for real-world applications.
Critical Analysis
The paper raises valid concerns about the fragility and limitations of current explainable GNN approaches. The authors provide a thorough and well-structured analysis of the key issues, grounding their arguments in relevant prior work in the field.
One potential criticism is that the paper primarily focuses on the technical challenges, without delving deeper into the broader societal implications and ethical considerations of deploying fragile and unreliable explainable AI systems. While the authors do briefly mention the need for a more human-centered design approach, further discussion on the potential risks and responsible development of these technologies could have strengthened the overall analysis.
Additionally, the paper could have benefited from a more in-depth discussion of potential mitigation strategies or alternative approaches to address the identified problems. While the authors do suggest future research directions, a more comprehensive exploration of possible solutions and their trade-offs could have provided readers with a clearer roadmap for improving explainable GNN systems.
Overall, the paper makes a compelling case for the need to address the fundamental limitations of current explainable GNN techniques, and serves as a valuable contribution to the ongoing discourse on the challenges and future directions in this important field of research.
Conclusion
This paper highlights the fragility and limitations of existing explainable graph neural network (GNN) models, which are designed to provide interpretable explanations for their predictions. The authors identify key issues, such as the sensitivity of explanations to small input changes, the difficulty in generating representative proxy graphs, and the lack of systematic evaluation frameworks.
To address these challenges, the paper suggests that future research should focus on developing more robust and stable explanation methods, improving proxy graph generation techniques, and establishing comprehensive evaluation protocols. Additionally, the authors emphasize the importance of adopting a more human-centered design approach, where the needs and understanding of end-users are prioritized in the development of explainable GNN systems.
By addressing these issues, the research community can work towards building more reliable and trustworthy explainable GNN models, which can unlock the full potential of these technologies and enable their safe and responsible deployment in real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Graph Neural Network Explanations are Fragile
Jiate Li, Meng Pang, Yun Dong, Jinyuan Jia, Binghui Wang
0
0
Explainable Graph Neural Network (GNN) has emerged recently to foster the trust of using GNNs. Existing GNN explainers are developed from various perspectives to enhance the explanation performance. We take the first step to study GNN explainers under adversarial attack--We found that an adversary slightly perturbing graph structure can ensure GNN model makes correct predictions, but the GNN explainer yields a drastically different explanation on the perturbed graph. Specifically, we first formulate the attack problem under a practical threat model (i.e., the adversary has limited knowledge about the GNN explainer and a restricted perturbation budget). We then design two methods (i.e., one is loss-based and the other is deduction-based) to realize the attack. We evaluate our attacks on various GNN explainers and the results show these explainers are fragile.
6/6/2024
Explainable AI Security: Exploring Robustness of Graph Neural Networks to Adversarial Attacks
Tao Wu, Canyixing Cui, Xingping Xian, Shaojie Qiao, Chao Wang, Lin Yuan, Shui Yu
0
0
Graph neural networks (GNNs) have achieved tremendous success, but recent studies have shown that GNNs are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, which significantly hinders their use in safety-critical scenarios. Therefore, the design of robust GNNs has attracted increasing attention. However, existing research has mainly been conducted via experimental trial and error, and thus far, there remains a lack of a comprehensive understanding of the vulnerability of GNNs. To address this limitation, we systematically investigate the adversarial robustness of GNNs by considering graph data patterns, model-specific factors, and the transferability of adversarial examples. Through extensive experiments, a set of principled guidelines is obtained for improving the adversarial robustness of GNNs, for example: (i) rather than highly regular graphs, the training graph data with diverse structural patterns is crucial for model robustness, which is consistent with the concept of adversarial training; (ii) the large model capacity of GNNs with sufficient training data has a positive effect on model robustness, and only a small percentage of neurons in GNNs are affected by adversarial attacks; (iii) adversarial transfer is not symmetric and the adversarial examples produced by the small-capacity model have stronger adversarial transferability. This work illuminates the vulnerabilities of GNNs and opens many promising avenues for designing robust GNNs.
6/21/2024
🧠
GraphFramEx: Towards Systematic Evaluation of Explainability Methods for Graph Neural Networks
Kenza Amara, Rex Ying, Zitao Zhang, Zhihao Han, Yinan Shan, Ulrik Brandes, Sebastian Schemm, Ce Zhang
0
0
As one of the most popular machine learning models today, graph neural networks (GNNs) have attracted intense interest recently, and so does their explainability. Users are increasingly interested in a better understanding of GNN models and their outcomes. Unfortunately, today's evaluation frameworks for GNN explainability often rely on few inadequate synthetic datasets, leading to conclusions of limited scope due to a lack of complexity in the problem instances. As GNN models are deployed to more mission-critical applications, we are in dire need for a common evaluation protocol of explainability methods of GNNs. In this paper, we propose, to our best knowledge, the first systematic evaluation framework for GNN explainability, considering explainability on three different user needs. We propose a unique metric that combines the fidelity measures and classifies explanations based on their quality of being sufficient or necessary. We scope ourselves to node classification tasks and compare the most representative techniques in the field of input-level explainability for GNNs. For the inadequate but widely used synthetic benchmarks, surprisingly shallow techniques such as personalized PageRank have the best performance for a minimum computation time. But when the graph structure is more complex and nodes have meaningful features, gradient-based methods are the best according to our evaluation criteria. However, none dominates the others on all evaluation dimensions and there is always a trade-off. We further apply our evaluation protocol in a case study for frauds explanation on eBay transaction graphs to reflect the production environment.
5/24/2024
🧠
L2XGNN: Learning to Explain Graph Neural Networks
Giuseppe Serra, Mathias Niepert
0
0
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are a popular class of machine learning models. Inspired by the learning to explain (L2X) paradigm, we propose L2XGNN, a framework for explainable GNNs which provides faithful explanations by design. L2XGNN learns a mechanism for selecting explanatory subgraphs (motifs) which are exclusively used in the GNNs message-passing operations. L2XGNN is able to select, for each input graph, a subgraph with specific properties such as being sparse and connected. Imposing such constraints on the motifs often leads to more interpretable and effective explanations. Experiments on several datasets suggest that L2XGNN achieves the same classification accuracy as baseline methods using the entire input graph while ensuring that only the provided explanations are used to make predictions. Moreover, we show that L2XGNN is able to identify motifs responsible for the graph's properties it is intended to predict.
6/17/2024