Design Requirements for Human-Centered Graph Neural Network Explanations
2405.06917
0
0
🧠
Abstract
Graph neural networks (GNNs) are powerful graph-based machine-learning models that are popular in various domains, e.g., social media, transportation, and drug discovery. However, owing to complex data representations, GNNs do not easily allow for human-intelligible explanations of their predictions, which can decrease trust in them as well as deter any collaboration opportunities between the AI expert and non-technical, domain expert. Here, we first discuss the two papers that aim to provide GNN explanations to domain experts in an accessible manner and then establish a set of design requirements for human-centered GNN explanations. Finally, we offer two example prototypes to demonstrate some of those proposed requirements.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Graph neural networks (GNNs) are powerful machine learning models that work well with graph-structured data, such as social media networks, transportation systems, and drug discovery.
- However, GNNs can be difficult for non-technical domain experts to understand, which can reduce trust and collaboration between AI experts and domain experts.
- This paper discusses two research efforts that aim to provide more accessible explanations of GNN predictions for domain experts.
- The paper also establishes a set of design requirements for human-centered GNN explanations and presents two example prototypes that demonstrate these requirements.
Plain English Explanation
Graph neural networks (GNNs) are a type of machine learning model that are particularly good at working with data that has a graph-like structure, such as social media networks, transportation systems, and the connections between molecules in drug discovery. These models can uncover powerful insights from this type of data.
However, the inner workings of GNNs can be quite complex and difficult for non-technical domain experts to understand. This can make it hard for them to trust the model's predictions and collaborate effectively with the AI experts who develop these systems. To address this issue, the researchers in this paper look at two different approaches that aim to provide more accessible explanations of GNN predictions for domain experts.
The paper also outlines a set of design requirements for creating human-centered GNN explanations that are clear, informative, and engaging for domain experts. To demonstrate these requirements, the researchers present two example prototypes that show different ways to explain GNN models in a way that is easy for non-technical users to understand.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by highlighting the growing popularity of graph neural networks (GNNs) across various domains, such as social media, transportation, and drug discovery. However, the authors note that the complex data representations used by GNNs can make it difficult to provide human-intelligible explanations of their predictions.
The authors then discuss two recent papers that have sought to address this challenge. The first paper, "Global Concept Explanations for Graphs by Contrastive Learning," presents a method for extracting high-level concepts from GNN models that can be used to explain their predictions. The second paper, "Interpretable Graph Neural Networks for Tabular Data," proposes an approach for generating interpretable GNN models that can be easily understood by domain experts.
Building on these research efforts, the authors then establish a set of design requirements for human-centered GNN explanations, including:
- Providing global-level explanations that give an overview of the model's decision-making process
- Highlighting key concepts and relationships that are meaningful to domain experts
- Using visualizations and analogies to make complex ideas more accessible
- Allowing for interactive exploration and customization of the explanations
To demonstrate these requirements, the authors present two example prototypes. The first prototype uses a contrastive learning approach to extract high-level concepts from a GNN model and visualize them in an interactive dashboard. The second prototype generates hierarchical explanations for a GNN model applied to tabular data, breaking down the model's reasoning in a way that is easy for domain experts to understand.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a strong case for the importance of developing human-centered explanations for graph neural networks, particularly as these models become more widely adopted in domains where collaboration between AI experts and non-technical domain experts is essential.
The authors' focus on providing global-level explanations, highlighting meaningful concepts, and using visualizations and analogies is well-justified, as these approaches can help bridge the gap between the complex inner workings of GNNs and the needs and perspectives of domain experts.
However, the paper does not delve into potential limitations or challenges of the proposed approaches. For example, it does not address how the quality and interpretability of the extracted concepts or hierarchical explanations might be affected by the underlying data or model architecture. Additionally, the paper does not discuss how these explanations might need to be tailored for different types of domain experts or application contexts.
Further research could explore these areas, as well as investigate the real-world impact of human-centered GNN explanations on trust, collaboration, and decision-making in various domains. Exploring dynamic graph neural networks and their explainability could also be a fruitful avenue for future work.
Conclusion
This paper highlights the importance of developing human-centered explanations for graph neural networks, which are powerful machine learning models used in a wide range of applications. By providing more accessible and meaningful explanations, the authors argue, we can increase trust in GNNs and foster greater collaboration between AI experts and domain experts.
The paper discusses two recent research efforts that have addressed this challenge and outlines a set of design requirements for human-centered GNN explanations, including global-level overviews, concept highlighting, and the use of visualizations and analogies. The authors then present two example prototypes that demonstrate these requirements in action.
Overall, this work represents an important step towards making graph neural networks more transparent and understandable for non-technical users, which could have significant implications for the continued adoption and real-world impact of these powerful AI models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🧠
L2XGNN: Learning to Explain Graph Neural Networks
Giuseppe Serra, Mathias Niepert
0
0
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) are a popular class of machine learning models. Inspired by the learning to explain (L2X) paradigm, we propose L2XGNN, a framework for explainable GNNs which provides faithful explanations by design. L2XGNN learns a mechanism for selecting explanatory subgraphs (motifs) which are exclusively used in the GNNs message-passing operations. L2XGNN is able to select, for each input graph, a subgraph with specific properties such as being sparse and connected. Imposing such constraints on the motifs often leads to more interpretable and effective explanations. Experiments on several datasets suggest that L2XGNN achieves the same classification accuracy as baseline methods using the entire input graph while ensuring that only the provided explanations are used to make predictions. Moreover, we show that L2XGNN is able to identify motifs responsible for the graph's properties it is intended to predict.
6/17/2024
Graph Neural Network Explanations are Fragile
Jiate Li, Meng Pang, Yun Dong, Jinyuan Jia, Binghui Wang
0
0
Explainable Graph Neural Network (GNN) has emerged recently to foster the trust of using GNNs. Existing GNN explainers are developed from various perspectives to enhance the explanation performance. We take the first step to study GNN explainers under adversarial attack--We found that an adversary slightly perturbing graph structure can ensure GNN model makes correct predictions, but the GNN explainer yields a drastically different explanation on the perturbed graph. Specifically, we first formulate the attack problem under a practical threat model (i.e., the adversary has limited knowledge about the GNN explainer and a restricted perturbation budget). We then design two methods (i.e., one is loss-based and the other is deduction-based) to realize the attack. We evaluate our attacks on various GNN explainers and the results show these explainers are fragile.
6/6/2024
Explainable Graph Neural Networks Under Fire
Zhong Li, Simon Geisler, Yuhang Wang, Stephan Gunnemann, Matthijs van Leeuwen
0
0
Predictions made by graph neural networks (GNNs) usually lack interpretability due to their complex computational behavior and the abstract nature of graphs. In an attempt to tackle this, many GNN explanation methods have emerged. Their goal is to explain a model's predictions and thereby obtain trust when GNN models are deployed in decision critical applications. Most GNN explanation methods work in a post-hoc manner and provide explanations in the form of a small subset of important edges and/or nodes. In this paper we demonstrate that these explanations can unfortunately not be trusted, as common GNN explanation methods turn out to be highly susceptible to adversarial perturbations. That is, even small perturbations of the original graph structure that preserve the model's predictions may yield drastically different explanations. This calls into question the trustworthiness and practical utility of post-hoc explanation methods for GNNs. To be able to attack GNN explanation models, we devise a novel attack method dubbed textit{GXAttack}, the first textit{optimization-based} adversarial attack method for post-hoc GNN explanations under such settings. Due to the devastating effectiveness of our attack, we call for an adversarial evaluation of future GNN explainers to demonstrate their robustness.
6/11/2024
GNNAnatomy: Systematic Generation and Evaluation of Multi-Level Explanations for Graph Neural Networks
Hsiao-Ying Lu, Yiran Li, Ujwal Pratap Krishna Kaluvakolanu Thyagarajan, Kwan-Liu Ma
0
0
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have proven highly effective in various machine learning (ML) tasks involving graphs, such as node/graph classification and link prediction. However, explaining the decisions made by GNNs poses challenges because of the aggregated relational information based on graph structure, leading to complex data transformations. Existing methods for explaining GNNs often face limitations in systematically exploring diverse substructures and evaluating results in the absence of ground truths. To address this gap, we introduce GNNAnatomy, a model- and dataset-agnostic visual analytics system designed to facilitate the generation and evaluation of multi-level explanations for GNNs. In GNNAnatomy, we employ graphlets to elucidate GNN behavior in graph-level classification tasks. By analyzing the associations between GNN classifications and graphlet frequencies, we formulate hypothesized factual and counterfactual explanations. To validate a hypothesized graphlet explanation, we introduce two metrics: (1) the correlation between its frequency and the classification confidence, and (2) the change in classification confidence after removing this substructure from the original graph. To demonstrate the effectiveness of GNNAnatomy, we conduct case studies on both real-world and synthetic graph datasets from various domains. Additionally, we qualitatively compare GNNAnatomy with a state-of-the-art GNN explainer, demonstrating the utility and versatility of our design.
6/10/2024