Going Proactive and Explanatory Against Malware Concept Drift

Read original: arXiv:2405.04095 - Published 5/8/2024 by Yiling He, Junchi Lei, Zhan Qin, Kui Ren
Total Score

0

Going Proactive and Explanatory Against Malware Concept Drift

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the challenge of "malware concept drift" - the tendency for malware samples to evolve over time, making it difficult for traditional malware detection models to keep up.
  • The researchers propose a proactive and explainable approach to address this problem, aiming to anticipate future malware samples and provide insights into the reasoning behind the model's predictions.
  • The paper introduces novel techniques for detecting and counteracting concept drift, including unsupervised concept drift detection and incremental learning.

Plain English Explanation

Malware, or malicious software, is constantly evolving as cybercriminals look for new ways to infiltrate computer systems. This poses a challenge for traditional malware detection models, which can become outdated as the malware landscape changes. The researchers in this paper tackle this problem, known as "malware concept drift," by taking a proactive and explanatory approach.

The key idea is to anticipate the evolution of malware and provide insights into how the detection model reaches its conclusions. This allows the model to stay ahead of the curve and helps security experts understand why certain samples are flagged as malicious.

The researchers introduce several novel techniques to achieve this. One is unsupervised concept drift detection, which can automatically identify when the malware landscape is shifting, without the need for manual labeling. Another is incremental learning, which allows the model to continuously update its knowledge and adapt to new threats.

By taking a proactive and explainable approach, the researchers aim to improve the resilience and transparency of malware detection systems, ultimately helping to protect against evolving cyber threats. This research builds on previous work in areas like counteracting concept drift and monitoring ML-enabled systems.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a novel framework for addressing malware concept drift, which is the tendency for malware samples to evolve over time, rendering traditional detection models less effective.

The key elements of the framework include:

  1. Unsupervised Concept Drift Detection: The researchers developed an unsupervised approach to automatically identify when the malware landscape is shifting, without the need for manual labeling of samples.

  2. Proactive and Explainable Malware Detection: The framework aims to anticipate future malware samples and provide insights into the reasoning behind the model's predictions, allowing security experts to understand and validate the decisions.

  3. Incremental Learning: The model is designed to continuously update its knowledge and adapt to new threats, rather than relying on static, outdated models.

The researchers conducted extensive experiments to evaluate the performance of their framework, using real-world malware datasets and comparing it to state-of-the-art approaches. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed techniques in detecting and counteracting malware concept drift, while providing valuable explanations to security teams.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach to addressing the challenge of malware concept drift, but it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for future research.

One key limitation is the reliance on static datasets for evaluation, which may not fully capture the dynamic nature of the real-world malware landscape. The researchers suggest that further testing on live, continuously evolving malware data would help validate the framework's performance in a more realistic setting.

Additionally, the paper notes that the explainability component of the framework, while valuable, may introduce additional computational overhead. Exploring ways to balance the trade-off between explainability and efficiency would be an important area for future work.

Another potential issue is the scalability of the proposed techniques, particularly as the volume and complexity of malware samples continue to grow. The researchers suggest exploring open-source drift detection tools and other strategies to ensure the framework can keep up with the evolving threat landscape.

Overall, the research represents a significant step forward in addressing the challenging problem of malware concept drift. However, as with any complex security problem, further research and real-world testing will be necessary to fully validate and refine the proposed solutions.

Conclusion

This paper presents a proactive and explainable approach to addressing the challenge of malware concept drift, a critical problem in cybersecurity. By introducing novel techniques for detecting and counteracting concept drift, the researchers aim to help security teams stay ahead of evolving malware threats and understand the reasoning behind their detection models.

The key innovations include unsupervised concept drift detection, proactive anticipation of future malware samples, and incremental learning to continuously update the model's knowledge. These techniques build on previous work in areas like counteracting concept drift, unsupervised drift detection, and monitoring ML-enabled systems.

While the paper highlights several areas for further research and improvement, the proposed framework represents an important step forward in the ongoing battle against evolving cyber threats. By combining proactive and explainable approaches, the researchers aim to strengthen the resilience and transparency of malware detection systems, ultimately contributing to a safer and more secure digital landscape.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Going Proactive and Explanatory Against Malware Concept Drift
Total Score

0

Going Proactive and Explanatory Against Malware Concept Drift

Yiling He, Junchi Lei, Zhan Qin, Kui Ren

Deep learning-based malware classifiers face significant challenges due to concept drift. The rapid evolution of malware, especially with new families, can depress classification accuracy to near-random levels. Previous research has primarily focused on detecting drift samples, relying on expert-led analysis and labeling for model retraining. However, these methods often lack a comprehensive understanding of malware concepts and provide limited guidance for effective drift adaptation, leading to unstable detection performance and high human labeling costs. To address these limitations, we introduce DREAM, a novel system designed to surpass the capabilities of existing drift detectors and to establish an explanatory drift adaptation process. DREAM enhances drift detection through model sensitivity and data autonomy. The detector, trained in a semi-supervised approach, proactively captures malware behavior concepts through classifier feedback. During testing, it utilizes samples generated by the detector itself, eliminating reliance on extensive training data. For drift adaptation, DREAM enlarges human intervention, enabling revisions of malware labels and concept explanations embedded within the detector's latent space. To ensure a comprehensive response to concept drift, it facilitates a coordinated update process for both the classifier and the detector. Our evaluation shows that DREAM can effectively improve the drift detection accuracy and reduce the expert analysis effort in adaptation across different malware datasets and classifiers.

Read more

5/8/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

Optimized Deep Learning Models for Malware Detection under Concept Drift

William Maillet, Benjamin Marais

Despite the promising results of machine learning models in malicious files detection, they face the problem of concept drift due to their constant evolution. This leads to declining performance over time, as the data distribution of the new files differs from the training one, requiring frequent model update. In this work, we propose a model-agnostic protocol to improve a baseline neural network against drift. We show the importance of feature reduction and training with the most recent validation set possible, and propose a loss function named Drift-Resilient Binary Cross-Entropy, an improvement to the classical Binary Cross-Entropy more effective against drift. We train our model on the EMBER dataset, published in2018, and evaluate it on a dataset of recent malicious files, collected between 2020 and 2023. Our improved model shows promising results, detecting 15.2% more malware than a baseline model.

Read more

8/2/2024

Counteracting Concept Drift by Learning with Future Malware Predictions
Total Score

0

Counteracting Concept Drift by Learning with Future Malware Predictions

Branislav Bosansky, Lada Hospodkova, Michal Najman, Maria Rigaki, Elnaz Babayeva, Viliam Lisy

The accuracy of deployed malware-detection classifiers degrades over time due to changes in data distributions and increasing discrepancies between training and testing data. This phenomenon is known as the concept drift. While the concept drift can be caused by various reasons in general, new malicious files are created by malware authors with a clear intention of avoiding detection. The existence of the intention opens a possibility for predicting such future samples. Including predicted samples in training data should consequently increase the accuracy of the classifiers on new testing data. We compare two methods for predicting future samples: (1) adversarial training and (2) generative adversarial networks (GANs). The first method explicitly seeks for adversarial examples against the classifier that are then used as a part of training data. Similarly, GANs also generate synthetic training data. We use GANs to learn changes in data distributions within different time periods of training data and then apply these changes to generate samples that could be in testing data. We compare these prediction methods on two different datasets: (1) Ember public dataset and (2) the internal dataset of files incoming to Avast. We show that while adversarial training yields more robust classifiers, this method is not a good predictor of future malware in general. This is in contrast with previously reported positive results in different domains (including natural language processing and spam detection). On the other hand, we show that GANs can be successfully used as predictors of future malware. We specifically examine malware families that exhibit significant changes in their data distributions over time and the experimental results confirm that GAN-based predictions can significantly improve the accuracy of the classifier on new, previously unseen data.

Read more

4/16/2024

Unsupervised Concept Drift Detection from Deep Learning Representations in Real-time
Total Score

0

Unsupervised Concept Drift Detection from Deep Learning Representations in Real-time

Salvatore Greco, Bartolomeo Vacchetti, Daniele Apiletti, Tania Cerquitelli

Concept Drift is a phenomenon in which the underlying data distribution and statistical properties of a target domain change over time, leading to a degradation of the model's performance. Consequently, models deployed in production require continuous monitoring through drift detection techniques. Most drift detection methods to date are supervised, i.e., based on ground-truth labels. However, true labels are usually not available in many real-world scenarios. Although recent efforts have been made to develop unsupervised methods, they often lack the required accuracy, have a complexity that makes real-time implementation in production environments difficult, or are unable to effectively characterize drift. To address these challenges, we propose DriftLens, an unsupervised real-time concept drift detection framework. It works on unstructured data by exploiting the distribution distances of deep learning representations. DriftLens can also provide drift characterization by analyzing each label separately. A comprehensive experimental evaluation is presented with multiple deep learning classifiers for text, image, and speech. Results show that (i) DriftLens performs better than previous methods in detecting drift in $11/13$ use cases; (ii) it runs at least 5 times faster; (iii) its detected drift value is very coherent with the amount of drift (correlation $geq 0.85$); (iv) it is robust to parameter changes.

Read more

6/27/2024