Open-Source Drift Detection Tools in Action: Insights from Two Use Cases
0
Sign in to get full access
Introduction
This paper explores the use of open-source drift detection tools in two real-world scenarios. Drift detection is the process of identifying changes in the statistical properties of data over time, which can have significant implications for machine learning models. The authors demonstrate how these open-source tools can be effectively applied to address drift-related challenges in production environments.
Preliminaries & Architecture
Open-Source Drift Detection Tools
The paper focuses on two popular open-source drift detection tools: [object Object] and [object Object]. These tools provide a range of drift detection techniques, including [object Object], [object Object], and [object Object], which can be applied to various types of data.
The authors describe the key components and capabilities of these drift detection tools, highlighting their flexibility in adapting to different data and model types. They also discuss the architecture and integration of these tools into the broader machine learning workflow.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on two open-source tools that can detect changes in data over time, a process known as "drift detection." Drift can be a significant challenge for machine learning models, as it can cause the model's performance to degrade if the data it was trained on no longer matches the data it's being used with.
The two tools discussed are called Alibi Detect and Drifter. These tools can identify different types of drift, such as changes in the overall distribution of the data, changes in specific features, or changes in the underlying concepts that the model is trying to learn. By using these tools, the researchers were able to apply drift detection in two real-world scenarios, demonstrating how these open-source tools can be effectively used to address drift-related issues in production environments.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a detailed examination of two open-source drift detection tools: Alibi Detect and Drifter. These tools are designed to identify changes in the statistical properties of data over time, which can have significant implications for machine learning models.
The authors describe the key components and capabilities of these drift detection tools, highlighting their ability to detect different types of drift, such as concept drift, feature drift, and distribution drift. They discuss the tools' flexible architecture, which allows them to be integrated into various machine learning workflows.
The paper then presents two use cases where the authors applied these drift detection tools in real-world scenarios. Through these case studies, the researchers demonstrate the practical value and effectiveness of using open-source drift detection tools to address drift-related challenges in production environments.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive overview of two open-source drift detection tools and their application in real-world scenarios. The authors have done a commendable job in highlighting the capabilities and flexibility of these tools, which can be valuable for practitioners working with machine learning models in dynamic environments.
However, the paper could have benefited from a more in-depth discussion of the limitations and potential drawbacks of these tools. For example, the authors could have addressed the performance and scalability of the tools when dealing with large-scale datasets or high-velocity data streams. Additionally, the paper could have explored the challenges of selecting appropriate drift detection algorithms and thresholds for different use cases.
Furthermore, the paper could have provided a more critical analysis of the two case studies presented, discussing the specific challenges encountered, the trade-offs made, and the lessons learned. This would have given readers a more nuanced understanding of the practical considerations involved in applying these drift detection tools in production environments.
Conclusion
This paper showcases the practical application of open-source drift detection tools, demonstrating their value in addressing drift-related challenges in real-world machine learning scenarios. The detailed exploration of Alibi Detect and Drifter, along with the case studies, provides valuable insights for practitioners interested in leveraging these tools to improve the robustness and reliability of their machine learning models.
While the paper could have delved deeper into the limitations and caveats of these tools, it nevertheless serves as a valuable resource for understanding the current state of open-source drift detection solutions and their potential impact on the field of machine learning.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Open-Source Drift Detection Tools in Action: Insights from Two Use Cases
Rieke Muller, Mohamed Abdelaal, Davor Stjelja
Data drifts pose a critical challenge in the lifecycle of machine learning (ML) models, affecting their performance and reliability. In response to this challenge, we present a microbenchmark study, called D3Bench, which evaluates the efficacy of open-source drift detection tools. D3Bench examines the capabilities of Evidently AI, NannyML, and Alibi-Detect, leveraging real-world data from two smart building use cases.We prioritize assessing the functional suitability of these tools to identify and analyze data drifts. Furthermore, we consider a comprehensive set of non-functional criteria, such as the integrability with ML pipelines, the adaptability to diverse data types, user-friendliness, computational efficiency, and resource demands. Our findings reveal that Evidently AI stands out for its general data drift detection, whereas NannyML excels at pinpointing the precise timing of shifts and evaluating their consequent effects on predictive accuracy.
Read more5/13/2024
🎯
0
How to Sustainably Monitor ML-Enabled Systems? Accuracy and Energy Efficiency Tradeoffs in Concept Drift Detection
Rafiullah Omar, Justus Bogner, Joran Leest, Vincenzo Stoico, Patricia Lago, Henry Muccini
ML-enabled systems that are deployed in a production environment typically suffer from decaying model prediction quality through concept drift, i.e., a gradual change in the statistical characteristics of a certain real-world domain. To combat this, a simple solution is to periodically retrain ML models, which unfortunately can consume a lot of energy. One recommended tactic to improve energy efficiency is therefore to systematically monitor the level of concept drift and only retrain when it becomes unavoidable. Different methods are available to do this, but we know very little about their concrete impact on the tradeoff between accuracy and energy efficiency, as these methods also consume energy themselves. To address this, we therefore conducted a controlled experiment to study the accuracy vs. energy efficiency tradeoff of seven common methods for concept drift detection. We used five synthetic datasets, each in a version with abrupt and one with gradual drift, and trained six different ML models as base classifiers. Based on a full factorial design, we tested 420 combinations (7 drift detectors * 5 datasets * 2 types of drift * 6 base classifiers) and compared energy consumption and drift detection accuracy. Our results indicate that there are three types of detectors: a) detectors that sacrifice energy efficiency for detection accuracy (KSWIN), b) balanced detectors that consume low to medium energy with good accuracy (HDDM_W, ADWIN), and c) detectors that consume very little energy but are unusable in practice due to very poor accuracy (HDDM_A, PageHinkley, DDM, EDDM). By providing rich evidence for this energy efficiency tactic, our findings support ML practitioners in choosing the best suited method of concept drift detection for their ML-enabled systems.
Read more5/1/2024
0
Concept Drift Detection using Ensemble of Integrally Private Models
Ayush K. Varshney, Vicenc Torra
Deep neural networks (DNNs) are one of the most widely used machine learning algorithm. DNNs requires the training data to be available beforehand with true labels. This is not feasible for many real-world problems where data arrives in the streaming form and acquisition of true labels are scarce and expensive. In the literature, not much focus has been given to the privacy prospect of the streaming data, where data may change its distribution frequently. These concept drifts must be detected privately in order to avoid any disclosure risk from DNNs. Existing privacy models use concept drift detection schemes such ADWIN, KSWIN to detect the drifts. In this paper, we focus on the notion of integrally private DNNs to detect concept drifts. Integrally private DNNs are the models which recur frequently from different datasets. Based on this, we introduce an ensemble methodology which we call 'Integrally Private Drift Detection' (IPDD) method to detect concept drift from private models. Our IPDD method does not require labels to detect drift but assumes true labels are available once the drift has been detected. We have experimented with binary and multi-class synthetic and real-world data. Our experimental results show that our methodology can privately detect concept drift, has comparable utility (even better in some cases) with ADWIN and outperforms utility from different levels of differentially private models. The source code for the paper is available hyperlink{https://github.com/Ayush-Umu/Concept-drift-detection-Using-Integrally-private-models}{here}.
Read more6/10/2024
🤿
0
Optimized Deep Learning Models for Malware Detection under Concept Drift
William Maillet, Benjamin Marais
Despite the promising results of machine learning models in malicious files detection, they face the problem of concept drift due to their constant evolution. This leads to declining performance over time, as the data distribution of the new files differs from the training one, requiring frequent model update. In this work, we propose a model-agnostic protocol to improve a baseline neural network against drift. We show the importance of feature reduction and training with the most recent validation set possible, and propose a loss function named Drift-Resilient Binary Cross-Entropy, an improvement to the classical Binary Cross-Entropy more effective against drift. We train our model on the EMBER dataset, published in2018, and evaluate it on a dataset of recent malicious files, collected between 2020 and 2023. Our improved model shows promising results, detecting 15.2% more malware than a baseline model.
Read more8/2/2024