Good Tools are Half the Work: Tool Usage in Deep Learning Projects

Read original: arXiv:2310.19124 - Published 5/29/2024 by Evangelia Panourgia (Athens University of Economics,Business), Theodoros Plessas (Athens University of Economics,Business), Ilias Balampanis (Athens University of Economics,Business), Diomidis Spinellis (Athens University of Economics,Business, Delft University of Technology)
Total Score

0

🤿

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper explores the use of software engineering (SE) practices and tools in the development of deep learning (DL) software
  • It analyzes the adoption of conventional SE tools and emerging MLOps (Machine Learning Operations) tools in popular open-source DL projects
  • The findings suggest that conventional SE tools are widely used in DL projects, while the adoption of specialized MLOps tools is relatively limited

Plain English Explanation

The rise of deep learning (DL) has led to a new field called Software Engineering for Deep Learning (SE4DL), which applies software engineering practices to DL software development. DL software is different from traditional software because it is data-driven and non-deterministic, meaning the output can vary even with the same input.

Despite these unique challenges, not much work has been done to create specialized tools for DL software development. However, there are some tools, known as MLOps tools, that are used to address non-SE issues specific to DL.

The researchers in this study looked at the use of both conventional SE tools and MLOps tools in popular open-source DL projects that use Python as the main programming language. They found that about 63% of the GitHub repositories they examined contained at least one conventional SE tool, with software construction tools being the most widely adopted. In contrast, the use of MLOps tools was relatively limited, with only 20 out of 74 tools being used in at least one repository.

This suggests that conventional SE tools are still highly relevant and useful for DL software development, even though DL has some unique characteristics. The researchers recommend further research on the adoption of MLOps tools, including understanding which types of tools are most relevant, developing new tools as needed, and finding ways to promote the use of existing MLOps tools.

Technical Explanation

The researchers conducted a mining software repositories (MSR) study to analyze the use of both conventional software engineering (SE) tools and emerging Machine Learning Operations (MLOps) tools in popular open-source deep learning (DL) projects that use Python as the main programming language.

They examined 74 GitHub repositories and found that about 63% of them contained at least one conventional SE tool. The most widely adopted tools were those related to software construction, such as version control, build automation, and dependency management. In contrast, tools for software management and maintenance were less commonly used.

Regarding MLOps tools, the researchers found that only 20 out of the 74 tools they examined were used in at least one repository. The majority of these tools were open-source rather than proprietary. One of the most widely adopted MLOps tools was TensorBoard, which was used in about half of the repositories.

These findings suggest that despite the unique challenges of DL software development, such as its data-driven and non-deterministic nature, conventional SE tools still play a significant role. The widespread use of these tools demonstrates their continued relevance and utility in the context of DL software development.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides valuable insights into the current state of tool usage in deep learning software development. However, there are a few areas that could be explored further:

  1. Adoption of MLOps tools: The relatively low adoption of MLOps tools, as highlighted in the study, raises questions about the reasons behind this. Further research is needed to understand the barriers to the adoption of these specialized tools and how they can be better integrated into the DL software development process.

  2. Evaluation of tool effectiveness: The paper does not delve into the effectiveness of the tools used in DL projects. It would be interesting to understand how these tools, both conventional and MLOps, impact the quality, efficiency, and maintainability of DL software.

  3. Contextual factors: The study does not consider the influence of factors such as project complexity, team size, or the specific DL use case on the choice and adoption of tools. Investigating these contextual factors could provide deeper insights into the tool usage patterns.

  4. Emerging trends: As the field of DL software development continues to evolve, there may be new tools or best practices that have emerged since the data for this study was collected. Regularly monitoring and updating the research in this area would be valuable.

Overall, the paper provides a solid foundation for understanding the current landscape of tool usage in DL software development, but there is still room for further exploration and research in this rapidly evolving field.

Conclusion

The rising popularity of deep learning has sparked interest in the field of Software Engineering for Deep Learning (SE4DL), which explores the application of software engineering practices to the development of DL software. This study's findings suggest that while DL software development poses unique challenges, conventional software engineering tools are still widely adopted in popular open-source DL projects.

The widespread use of these tools, particularly in areas like software construction, demonstrates their continued relevance and utility in the DL context. However, the relatively limited adoption of specialized MLOps tools highlights the need for further research and development in this area.

By better understanding the tool usage patterns in DL software development, researchers and practitioners can work to improve the tools, processes, and best practices that support the efficient and effective development of high-quality DL software.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤿

Total Score

0

Good Tools are Half the Work: Tool Usage in Deep Learning Projects

Evangelia Panourgia (Athens University of Economics,Business), Theodoros Plessas (Athens University of Economics,Business), Ilias Balampanis (Athens University of Economics,Business), Diomidis Spinellis (Athens University of Economics,Business, Delft University of Technology)

The rising popularity of deep learning (DL) methods and techniques has invigorated interest in the topic of SE4DL (Software Engineering for Deep Learning), the application of software engineering (SE) practices on deep learning software. Despite the novel engineering challenges brought on by the data-driven and non-deterministic paradigm of DL software, little work has been invested into developing DL-targeted SE tools. On the other hand, tools tackling non-SE issues specific to DL are actively used and referred to under the umbrella term MLOps (Machine Learning Operations) tools. Nevertheless, the available literature supports the utility of conventional SE tooling in DL software development. Building upon previous mining software repositories (MSR) research on tool usage in open-source software works, we identify conventional and MLOps tools adopted in popular applied DL projects that use Python as the main programming language. About 63% of the GitHub repositories we examined contained at least one conventional SE tool. Software construction tools are the most widely adopted, while the opposite applies to management and maintenance tools. Relatively few MLOps tools were found to be use, with only 20 tools out of a sample of 74 used in at least one repository. The majority of them were open-source rather than proprietary. One of these tools, TensorBoard, was found to be adopted in about half of the repositories in our study. Consequently, the widespread use of conventional SE tooling demonstrates its relevance to DL software. Further research is recommended on the adoption of MLOps tooling, focusing on the relevance of particular tool types, the development of required tools, as well as ways to promote the use of already available tools.

Read more

5/29/2024

Open-Source AI-based SE Tools: Opportunities and Challenges of Collaborative Software Learning
Total Score

0

Open-Source AI-based SE Tools: Opportunities and Challenges of Collaborative Software Learning

Zhihao Lin, Wei Ma, Tao Lin, Yaowen Zheng, Jingquan Ge, Jun Wang, Jacques Klein, Tegawende Bissyande, Yang Liu, Li Li

Large Language Models (LLMs) have become instrumental in advancing software engineering (SE) tasks, showcasing their efficacy in code understanding and beyond. Like traditional SE tools, open-source collaboration is key in realising the excellent products. However, with AI models, the essential need is in data. The collaboration of these AI-based SE models hinges on maximising the sources of high-quality data. However, data especially of high quality, often holds commercial or sensitive value, making it less accessible for open-source AI-based SE projects. This reality presents a significant barrier to the development and enhancement of AI-based SE tools within the software engineering community. Therefore, researchers need to find solutions for enabling open-source AI-based SE models to tap into resources by different organisations. Addressing this challenge, our position paper investigates one solution to facilitate access to diverse organizational resources for open-source AI models, ensuring privacy and commercial sensitivities are respected. We introduce a governance framework centered on federated learning (FL), designed to foster the joint development and maintenance of open-source AI code models while safeguarding data privacy and security. Additionally, we present guidelines for developers on AI-based SE tool collaboration, covering data requirements, model architecture, updating strategies, and version control. Given the significant influence of data characteristics on FL, our research examines the effect of code data heterogeneity on FL performance.

Read more

4/10/2024

🗣️

Total Score

0

A Systematic Literature Review on the Use of Machine Learning in Software Engineering

Nyaga Fred, I. O. Temkin

Software engineering (SE) is a dynamic field that involves multiple phases all of which are necessary to develop sustainable software systems. Machine learning (ML), a branch of artificial intelligence (AI), has drawn a lot of attention in recent years thanks to its ability to analyze massive volumes of data and extract useful patterns from data. Several studies have focused on examining, categorising, and assessing the application of ML in SE processes. We conducted a literature review on primary studies to address this gap. The study was carried out following the objective and the research questions to explore the current state of the art in applying machine learning techniques in software engineering processes. The review identifies the key areas within software engineering where ML has been applied, including software quality assurance, software maintenance, software comprehension, and software documentation. It also highlights the specific ML techniques that have been leveraged in these domains, such as supervised learning, unsupervised learning, and deep learning. Keywords: machine learning, deep learning, software engineering, natural language processing, source code

Read more

6/21/2024

🤿

Total Score

0

Utilizing Deep Learning to Optimize Software Development Processes

Keqin Li, Armando Zhu, Peng Zhao, Jintong Song, Jiabei Liu

This study explores the application of deep learning technologies in software development processes, particularly in automating code reviews, error prediction, and test generation to enhance code quality and development efficiency. Through a series of empirical studies, experimental groups using deep learning tools and control groups using traditional methods were compared in terms of code error rates and project completion times. The results demonstrated significant improvements in the experimental group, validating the effectiveness of deep learning technologies. The research also discusses potential optimization points, methodologies, and technical challenges of deep learning in software development, as well as how to integrate these technologies into existing software development workflows.

Read more

5/6/2024