Towards Practical Tool Usage for Continually Learning LLMs
2404.09339
0
0
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) show an innate skill for solving language based tasks. But insights have suggested an inability to adjust for information or task-solving skills becoming outdated, as their knowledge, stored directly within their parameters, remains static in time. Tool use helps by offloading work to systems that the LLM can access through an interface, but LLMs that use them still must adapt to nonstationary environments for prolonged use, as new tools can emerge and existing tools can change. Nevertheless, tools require less specialized knowledge, therefore we hypothesize they are better suited for continual learning (CL) as they rely less on parametric memory for solving tasks and instead focus on learning when to apply pre-defined tools. To verify this, we develop a synthetic benchmark and follow this by aggregating existing NLP tasks to form a more realistic testing scenario. While we demonstrate scaling model size is not a solution, regardless of tool usage, continual learning techniques can enable tool LLMs to both adapt faster while forgetting less, highlighting their potential as continual learners.
Create account to get full access
Overview
ā¢ This paper explores the challenges and potential solutions for using large language models (LLMs) as continual learners - models that can continuously expand their knowledge and capabilities over time.
ā¢ The authors propose a practical tool usage framework for enabling continual learning in LLMs, which involves incorporating various modules and techniques to address key issues like catastrophic forgetting, task interference, and scalable training.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 have shown impressive capabilities in tasks like natural language processing and generation. However, these models are typically trained on a fixed dataset and struggle to continuously learn and expand their knowledge over time, a process known as continual learning.
The authors of this paper want to make it easier for LLMs to keep learning and improving even after their initial training. They propose a framework that combines different tools and techniques to help LLMs learn continuously without forgetting what they've already learned (Scalable Language Model for Generalized Continual Learning) or getting confused by new information (Large Language Model Can Continue Evolving From).
By making LLMs better at continual learning, the authors hope to turn them from "apprentices to research assistants", helping them become more useful and capable over time, even in specialized domains (Analyzing LLM Usage in an Advanced Computing Class in India).
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a practical tool usage framework for enabling continual learning in LLMs. This framework involves incorporating various modules and techniques to address key issues in continual learning, such as:
- Catastrophic Forgetting: Preventing the model from forgetting previously learned knowledge when learning new tasks (AdapterSwap: Continuous Training of LLMs with Data Removal and Access).
- Task Interference: Mitigating the negative impact of learning new tasks on the performance of previously learned tasks.
- Scalable Training: Enabling efficient and scalable training of LLMs for continual learning.
The authors discuss the importance of developing practical tools and techniques to support the continual learning of LLMs, which can help turn them from "apprentices to research assistants" and enable them to become more useful and capable over time, even in specialized domains.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable framework for addressing the challenges of continual learning in LLMs, which is an important area of research. However, the authors do not delve deeply into the specific technical details of the proposed solutions, which may limit the reader's understanding of the practical implementation and evaluation of the framework.
Additionally, the paper does not discuss potential limitations or caveats of the proposed approach, such as the computational and memory requirements of the various modules and techniques, or the impact of the framework on the overall performance and robustness of the LLMs.
Further research and evaluation may be needed to assess the real-world applicability and scalability of the proposed framework, as well as its ability to address the diverse range of continual learning challenges faced by LLMs in different domains and use cases.
Conclusion
This paper presents a practical tool usage framework for enabling continual learning in large language models (LLMs). By incorporating various modules and techniques to address key issues like catastrophic forgetting, task interference, and scalable training, the authors aim to turn LLMs from "apprentices to research assistants" - models that can continuously expand their knowledge and capabilities over time, even in specialized domains.
The proposed framework offers a promising approach to making LLMs more adaptable and useful, but further research and evaluation are needed to fully assess its real-world applicability and limitations. As the field of continual learning in LLMs continues to evolve, this paper provides a valuable contribution to the ongoing efforts to unlock the full potential of these powerful models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Tool Learning with Large Language Models: A Survey
Changle Qu, Sunhao Dai, Xiaochi Wei, Hengyi Cai, Shuaiqiang Wang, Dawei Yin, Jun Xu, Ji-Rong Wen
0
0
Recently, tool learning with large language models (LLMs) has emerged as a promising paradigm for augmenting the capabilities of LLMs to tackle highly complex problems. Despite growing attention and rapid advancements in this field, the existing literature remains fragmented and lacks systematic organization, posing barriers to entry for newcomers. This gap motivates us to conduct a comprehensive survey of existing works on tool learning with LLMs. In this survey, we focus on reviewing existing literature from the two primary aspects (1) why tool learning is beneficial and (2) how tool learning is implemented, enabling a comprehensive understanding of tool learning with LLMs. We first explore the why by reviewing both the benefits of tool integration and the inherent benefits of the tool learning paradigm from six specific aspects. In terms of how, we systematically review the literature according to a taxonomy of four key stages in the tool learning workflow: task planning, tool selection, tool calling, and response generation. Additionally, we provide a detailed summary of existing benchmarks and evaluation methods, categorizing them according to their relevance to different stages. Finally, we discuss current challenges and outline potential future directions, aiming to inspire both researchers and industrial developers to further explore this emerging and promising area. We also maintain a GitHub repository to continually keep track of the relevant papers and resources in this rising area at url{https://github.com/quchangle1/LLM-Tool-Survey}.
5/31/2024
š¬
Continual Learning of Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Survey
Haizhou Shi, Zihao Xu, Hengyi Wang, Weiyi Qin, Wenyuan Wang, Yibin Wang, Hao Wang
0
0
The recent success of large language models (LLMs) trained on static, pre-collected, general datasets has sparked numerous research directions and applications. One such direction addresses the non-trivial challenge of integrating pre-trained LLMs into dynamic data distributions, task structures, and user preferences. Pre-trained LLMs, when tailored for specific needs, often experience significant performance degradation in previous knowledge domains -- a phenomenon known as catastrophic forgetting. While extensively studied in the continual learning (CL) community, it presents new manifestations in the realm of LLMs. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive overview of the current research progress on LLMs within the context of CL. This survey is structured into four main sections: we first describe an overview of continually learning LLMs, consisting of two directions of continuity: vertical continuity (or vertical continual learning), i.e., continual adaptation from general to specific capabilities, and horizontal continuity (or horizontal continual learning), i.e., continual adaptation across time and domains (Section 3). We then summarize three stages of learning LLMs in the context of modern CL: Continual Pre-Training (CPT), Domain-Adaptive Pre-training (DAP), and Continual Fine-Tuning (CFT) (Section 4). Then we provide an overview of evaluation protocols for continual learning with LLMs, along with the current available data sources (Section 5). Finally, we discuss intriguing questions pertaining to continual learning for LLMs (Section 6). The full list of papers examined in this survey is available at https://github.com/Wang-ML-Lab/llm-continual-learning-survey.
4/26/2024
š¬
Towards Lifelong Learning of Large Language Models: A Survey
Junhao Zheng, Shengjie Qiu, Chengming Shi, Qianli Ma
0
0
As the applications of large language models (LLMs) expand across diverse fields, the ability of these models to adapt to ongoing changes in data, tasks, and user preferences becomes crucial. Traditional training methods, relying on static datasets, are increasingly inadequate for coping with the dynamic nature of real-world information. Lifelong learning, also known as continual or incremental learning, addresses this challenge by enabling LLMs to learn continuously and adaptively over their operational lifetime, integrating new knowledge while retaining previously learned information and preventing catastrophic forgetting. This survey delves into the sophisticated landscape of lifelong learning, categorizing strategies into two primary groups: Internal Knowledge and External Knowledge. Internal Knowledge includes continual pretraining and continual finetuning, each enhancing the adaptability of LLMs in various scenarios. External Knowledge encompasses retrieval-based and tool-based lifelong learning, leveraging external data sources and computational tools to extend the model's capabilities without modifying core parameters. The key contributions of our survey are: (1) Introducing a novel taxonomy categorizing the extensive literature of lifelong learning into 12 scenarios; (2) Identifying common techniques across all lifelong learning scenarios and classifying existing literature into various technique groups within each scenario; (3) Highlighting emerging techniques such as model expansion and data selection, which were less explored in the pre-LLM era. Through a detailed examination of these groups and their respective categories, this survey aims to enhance the adaptability, reliability, and overall performance of LLMs in real-world applications.
6/11/2024
šø
LLMs for Science: Usage for Code Generation and Data Analysis
Mohamed Nejjar, Luca Zacharias, Fabian Stiehle, Ingo Weber
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have been touted to enable increased productivity in many areas of today's work life. Scientific research as an area of work is no exception: the potential of LLM-based tools to assist in the daily work of scientists has become a highly discussed topic across disciplines. However, we are only at the very onset of this subject of study. It is still unclear how the potential of LLMs will materialise in research practice. With this study, we give first empirical evidence on the use of LLMs in the research process. We have investigated a set of use cases for LLM-based tools in scientific research, and conducted a first study to assess to which degree current tools are helpful. In this paper we report specifically on use cases related to software engineering, such as generating application code and developing scripts for data analytics. While we studied seemingly simple use cases, results across tools differ significantly. Our results highlight the promise of LLM-based tools in general, yet we also observe various issues, particularly regarding the integrity of the output these tools provide.
4/24/2024