A Grassroots Architecture to Supplant Global Digital Platforms by a Global Digital Democracy
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Presents a grassroots architecture to replace global digital platforms with a global digital democracy
- Focuses on key concepts like digital sovereignty, federated data ownership, and decentralized governance
- Outlines a technical implementation using blockchain, peer-to-peer protocols, and decentralized applications
Plain English Explanation
This paper proposes an alternative to the current global digital platforms, like big tech companies, that dominate the internet. The core idea is to create a "grassroots architecture" for the internet that is decentralized and controlled by the people, rather than a few large corporations.
The key concepts include digital sovereignty, where individuals and communities have more control over their own digital data and online activities. There's also the idea of federated data ownership, where data is stored and managed locally instead of being centralized. And the overall system would have a decentralized governance structure, rather than being controlled by a single entity.
The technical implementation would leverage blockchain technology, peer-to-peer protocols, and decentralized applications to create this new, more democratic internet architecture. The goal is to empower individuals and communities to have more control over their online lives, rather than having that control concentrated in the hands of a few big tech companies.
Technical Explanation
The paper outlines a grassroots architecture that aims to replace global digital platforms with a global digital democracy. It focuses on three core concepts:
-
Digital sovereignty: Giving individuals and communities more control over their digital data and online activities, rather than having that control centralized with large tech companies.
-
Federated data ownership: Data is stored and managed locally, rather than being centralized in the hands of a few large entities. This decentralized approach aims to give people more control over their personal information.
-
Decentralized governance: The overall system would have a distributed governance structure, rather than being controlled by a single entity. This aligns with the goal of empowering individuals and communities.
The technical implementation leverages blockchain technology, peer-to-peer protocols, and decentralized applications. These technologies enable the creation of a more democratic and distributed internet architecture, where power is not concentrated in the hands of a few large platforms.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents an ambitious and thought-provoking vision for a more decentralized and democratized internet. The core concepts of digital sovereignty, federated data ownership, and decentralized governance are compelling and address valid concerns about the current state of global digital platforms.
However, the authors do not fully address the significant technical and operational challenges of implementing such a system at a global scale. Questions remain about the scalability, interoperability, and user experience of a decentralized architecture compared to the current centralized platforms.
Additionally, the paper does not explore potential issues around governance, incentive structures, and the risk of new forms of concentration of power within the proposed system. These are important considerations that warrant further research and discussion.
Conclusion
This paper offers a bold and innovative proposal to transform the current internet landscape dominated by global digital platforms. By focusing on principles of digital sovereignty, federated data ownership, and decentralized governance, the authors lay the groundwork for a more democratic and empowering online ecosystem.
While the technical and operational details require further exploration, the core ideas presented in this paper are compelling and deserve serious consideration as the internet continues to evolve. Ultimately, the vision of a "global digital democracy" could have far-reaching implications for how we collectively shape the future of the digital world.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A Grassroots Architecture to Supplant Global Digital Platforms by a Global Digital Democracy
Ehud Shapiro
We present an architectural alternative to global digital platforms termed grassroots, designed to serve the social, economic, civic, and political needs of local digital communities, as well as their federation. Grassroots platforms may offer local communities an alternative to global digital platforms while operating solely on the smartphones of their members, forsaking any global resources other than the network itself. Such communities may form digital economies without initial capital or external credit, exercise sovereign democratic governance, and federate, ultimately resulting in the grassroots formation of a global digital democracy.
Read more7/2/2024
🐍
0
Grassroots Social Networking: Where People have Agency over their Personal Information and Social Graph
Ehud Shapiro
Offering an architecture for social networking in which people have agency over their personal information and social graph is an open challenge. Here we present a grassroots architecture for serverless, permissionless, peer-to-peer social networks termed Grassroots Social Networking that aims to address this challenge. The architecture is geared for people with networked smartphones -- roaming (address-changing) computing devices communicating over an unreliable network (e.g., using UDP). The architecture incorporates (i) a decentralized social graph, where each person controls, maintains and stores only their local neighborhood in the graph; (iii) personal feeds, with authors and followers who create and store the feeds; and (ii) a grassroots dissemination protocol, in which communication among people occurs only along the edges of their social graph. The architecture realizes these components using the blocklace data structure -- a partially-ordered conflict-free counterpart of the totally-ordered conflict-based blockchain. We provide two example Grassroots Social Networking protocols -- Twitter-like and WhatsApp-like -- and address their security (safety, liveness and privacy), spam/bot/deep-fake resistance, and implementation, demonstrating how server-based social networks could be supplanted by a grassroots architecture.
Read more5/2/2024
🗣️
0
Decentralized Social Networks and the Future of Free Speech Online
Tao Huang
Decentralized social networks like Mastodon and BlueSky are trending topics that have drawn much attention and discussion in recent years. By devolving powers from the central node to the end users, decentralized social networks aim to cure existing pathologies on the centralized platforms and have been viewed by many as the future of the Internet. This article critically and systematically assesses the decentralization project's prospect for communications online. It uses normative theories of free speech to examine whether and how the decentralization design could facilitate users' freedom of expression online. The analysis shows that both promises and pitfalls exist, highlighting the importance of value-based design in this area. Two most salient issues for the design of the decentralized networks are: how to balance the decentralization ideal with constant needs of centralization on the network, and how to empower users to make them truly capable of exercising their control. The article then uses some design examples, such as the shared blocklist and the opt-in search function, to illustrate the value considerations underlying the design choices. Some tentative proposals for law and policy interventions are offered to better facilitate the design of the new network. Rather than providing clear answers, the article seeks to map the value implications of the design choices, highlight the stakes, and point directions for future research.
Read more6/12/2024
0
How Decentralization Affects User Agency on Social Platforms
Aditya Surve, Aneesh Shamraj, Swapneel Mehta
Mainstream social media platforms function as walled garden ecosystems that restrict user agency, control, and data portability. They have demonstrated a lack of transparency that contributes to a multitude of online harms. Our research investigates how decentralization might present promise as an alternative model to walled garden platforms. Specifically, we describe the user-driven content moderation through blocks as an expression of agency on Bluesky, a decentralized social platform. We examine the impact of providing users with more granular control over their online experiences, including what they post, who can see it, and whose content they are exposed to. We describe the patterns identified in user-driven content moderation and suggest directions for further research.
Read more6/14/2024