Grassroots Social Networking: Where People have Agency over their Personal Information and Social Graph

Read original: arXiv:2306.13941 - Published 5/2/2024 by Ehud Shapiro
Total Score

0

🐍

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Presents a grassroots architecture for decentralized, peer-to-peer social networking
  • Aims to give people more control over their personal data and social connections
  • Focuses on networked smartphones as the computing devices
  • Key components include a decentralized social graph, personal feeds, and a grassroots dissemination protocol

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces a new way to build social networks that puts more power in the hands of individual users. Typical social networks are run by large tech companies that control people's personal information and social connections. The grassroots social networking architecture proposed here is decentralized, meaning there is no central authority controlling everything.

In this system, each person would have their own local neighborhood in the social graph, which they control and maintain themselves. They would also create and store their own personal feeds, rather than having a centralized platform host all the content. Communication would happen directly between people along the edges of the social graph, using a grassroots dissemination protocol similar to how distributed systems coordinate.

The key ideas are to give users more agency over their data and social interactions, and to create a social network that isn't dependent on large tech companies or vulnerable to their control. This could help address concerns around privacy, censorship, and the power of a few dominant platforms.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a blocklace data structure as the foundation of the grassroots social networking architecture. Blocklace is a partially-ordered, conflict-free alternative to the totally-ordered, conflict-based blockchain. It allows for decentralized storage and coordination of the social graph and personal feeds.

The architecture has three main components:

  1. Decentralized Social Graph: Each user maintains and stores only their local neighborhood in the overall social graph, rather than a centralized server storing the entire graph.

  2. Personal Feeds: Users create and store their own personal feeds, with followers accessing the feeds directly rather than through a central platform.

  3. Grassroots Dissemination Protocol: Communication between users happens directly along the edges of the social graph, without going through any central servers.

The paper provides two example protocols built on this architecture - one similar to Twitter, and one similar to WhatsApp. It analyzes the security, spam/bot resistance, and implementation of these protocols, showing how they could replace traditional centralized social networking platforms.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling vision for decentralized social networking that gives users more control. However, some potential challenges and limitations are not fully addressed:

  • Scalability: Maintaining a fully decentralized social graph and feed system may become difficult as the network grows very large. Techniques for flexible, scalable web architectures could help address this.

  • Accessibility: Relying on networked smartphones may exclude some users who don't have access to such devices. Integrating decentralized computing approaches could expand accessibility.

  • Incentives: It's unclear what incentives would motivate users to maintain their portion of the social graph and personal feeds. Proper incentive structures will be crucial for long-term sustainability.

Overall, the grassroots social networking architecture presented is an innovative approach to the challenge of empowering users in social media. Further research is needed to address the scalability, accessibility, and incentive challenges to make this vision a practical reality.

Conclusion

This paper offers an ambitious proposal for a decentralized, user-centric social networking architecture that could help address concerns around privacy, censorship, and the dominance of a few tech giants. By putting users in control of their personal data and social connections, the grassroots approach aims to create a more equitable and resilient social networking ecosystem. While there are some open challenges to overcome, the core ideas presented here could significantly reshape the future of online social interaction.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🐍

Total Score

0

Grassroots Social Networking: Where People have Agency over their Personal Information and Social Graph

Ehud Shapiro

Offering an architecture for social networking in which people have agency over their personal information and social graph is an open challenge. Here we present a grassroots architecture for serverless, permissionless, peer-to-peer social networks termed Grassroots Social Networking that aims to address this challenge. The architecture is geared for people with networked smartphones -- roaming (address-changing) computing devices communicating over an unreliable network (e.g., using UDP). The architecture incorporates (i) a decentralized social graph, where each person controls, maintains and stores only their local neighborhood in the graph; (iii) personal feeds, with authors and followers who create and store the feeds; and (ii) a grassroots dissemination protocol, in which communication among people occurs only along the edges of their social graph. The architecture realizes these components using the blocklace data structure -- a partially-ordered conflict-free counterpart of the totally-ordered conflict-based blockchain. We provide two example Grassroots Social Networking protocols -- Twitter-like and WhatsApp-like -- and address their security (safety, liveness and privacy), spam/bot/deep-fake resistance, and implementation, demonstrating how server-based social networks could be supplanted by a grassroots architecture.

Read more

5/2/2024

A Grassroots Architecture to Supplant Global Digital Platforms by a Global Digital Democracy
Total Score

0

A Grassroots Architecture to Supplant Global Digital Platforms by a Global Digital Democracy

Ehud Shapiro

We present an architectural alternative to global digital platforms termed grassroots, designed to serve the social, economic, civic, and political needs of local digital communities, as well as their federation. Grassroots platforms may offer local communities an alternative to global digital platforms while operating solely on the smartphones of their members, forsaking any global resources other than the network itself. Such communities may form digital economies without initial capital or external credit, exercise sovereign democratic governance, and federate, ultimately resulting in the grassroots formation of a global digital democracy.

Read more

7/2/2024

Looking AT the Blue Skies of Bluesky
Total Score

0

Looking AT the Blue Skies of Bluesky

Leonhard Balduf, Saidu Sokoto, Onur Ascigil, Gareth Tyson, Bjorn Scheuermann, Maciej Korczy'nski, Ignacio Castro, Micha{l} Kr'ol

The pitfalls of centralized social networks, such as Facebook and Twitter/X, have led to concerns about control, transparency, and accountability. Decentralized social networks have emerged as a result with the goal of empowering users. These decentralized approaches come with their own tradeoffs, and therefore multiple architectures exist. In this paper, we conduct the first large-scale analysis of Bluesky, a prominent decentralized microblogging platform. In contrast to alternative approaches (e.g. Mastodon), Bluesky decomposes and opens the key functions of the platform into subcomponents that can be provided by third party stakeholders. We collect a comprehensive dataset covering all the key elements of Bluesky, study user activity and assess the diversity of providers for each sub-components.

Read more

8/23/2024

How Decentralization Affects User Agency on Social Platforms
Total Score

0

How Decentralization Affects User Agency on Social Platforms

Aditya Surve, Aneesh Shamraj, Swapneel Mehta

Mainstream social media platforms function as walled garden ecosystems that restrict user agency, control, and data portability. They have demonstrated a lack of transparency that contributes to a multitude of online harms. Our research investigates how decentralization might present promise as an alternative model to walled garden platforms. Specifically, we describe the user-driven content moderation through blocks as an expression of agency on Bluesky, a decentralized social platform. We examine the impact of providing users with more granular control over their online experiences, including what they post, who can see it, and whose content they are exposed to. We describe the patterns identified in user-driven content moderation and suggest directions for further research.

Read more

6/14/2024