GUI Action Narrator: Where and When Did That Action Take Place?

Read original: arXiv:2406.13719 - Published 6/21/2024 by Qinchen Wu, Difei Gao, Kevin Qinghong Lin, Zhuoyu Wu, Xiangwu Guo, Peiran Li, Weichen Zhang, Hengxu Wang, Mike Zheng Shou
Total Score

0

GUI Action Narrator: Where and When Did That Action Take Place?

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Introduction

This research paper explores a novel approach to understanding the context and timing of user actions within graphical user interfaces (GUIs). The authors propose a system called "GUI Action Narrator" that aims to provide detailed information about where and when a specific user action took place within a GUI.

Related Work

The paper situates this work in the context of existing research on GUI automation from instructional videos, multimodal approaches to GUI understanding, and leveraging large language models for GUI-related tasks. It also highlights the availability of GUI-oriented multimodal datasets and GUI search engines using computer vision as relevant background for this work.

Act2

Overview

  • The GUI Action Narrator system aims to provide detailed information about the location and timing of user actions within a graphical user interface.
  • It combines computer vision techniques to detect and track user actions with natural language processing to generate descriptive narratives about those actions.
  • The system is designed to provide useful contextual information to help users understand and follow along with GUI-based workflows.

Plain English Explanation

The GUI Action Narrator system is a tool that helps users understand where and when different actions take place within a graphical user interface (GUI). It works by analyzing screenshots or video recordings of a user interacting with a GUI and automatically generating detailed descriptions of the user's actions.

For example, if a user clicks on a button in the top-right corner of the screen, the GUI Action Narrator would detect that action and explain something like "The user just clicked the 'Submit' button in the top-right corner of the interface." This can be helpful for users trying to follow along with a GUI-based task or workflow, as it provides valuable contextual information about the specific actions being performed.

The system combines computer vision techniques, which allow it to detect and track user interactions within the GUI, with natural language processing to generate the descriptive narratives. This multimodal approach enables the GUI Action Narrator to provide rich, informative descriptions of the user's actions in a way that is easy for humans to understand.

Technical Explanation

The core of the GUI Action Narrator system is a computer vision model that can detect and localize user interactions within a graphical user interface. This model takes in screenshots or video frames of the GUI and outputs bounding boxes and labels for the various user actions, such as clicking, typing, or scrolling.

To generate the natural language descriptions, the system integrates this computer vision output with a natural language generation module. This module uses techniques like template-based generation and neural language models to convert the detected actions and their locations into fluent, human-readable narratives.

The researchers evaluate the GUI Action Narrator on a range of GUI-based tasks and workflows, assessing both the accuracy of the action detection and the quality of the generated narratives. Their results demonstrate the system's ability to provide useful contextual information to users in a variety of GUI-based scenarios.

Critical Analysis

The GUI Action Narrator presents an interesting approach to enhancing user understanding of GUI-based workflows. By providing detailed information about the timing and location of user actions, the system has the potential to improve task completion, user guidance, and overall user experience.

However, the paper does not fully address the potential limitations of the system. For example, the authors do not discuss how the system might handle complex or dynamic GUIs, where user interactions may be more varied or the interface elements may change over time. Additionally, the paper does not explore potential privacy concerns or user consent issues that may arise when automatically monitoring and narrating user actions within a GUI.

Further research could also investigate the effectiveness of the GUI Action Narrator in real-world settings, evaluating factors such as user engagement, task performance, and subjective feedback. Exploring ways to personalize the narratives or allow users to customize the level of detail could also enhance the system's usefulness and adoption.

Conclusion

The GUI Action Narrator represents a promising approach to enhancing user understanding and engagement with graphical user interfaces. By providing detailed, contextual information about user actions, the system has the potential to improve task completion, user guidance, and overall user experience in a variety of GUI-based applications. While the paper presents a strong technical foundation, further research is needed to fully address the system's limitations and optimize its performance in real-world scenarios.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

GUI Action Narrator: Where and When Did That Action Take Place?
Total Score

0

GUI Action Narrator: Where and When Did That Action Take Place?

Qinchen Wu, Difei Gao, Kevin Qinghong Lin, Zhuoyu Wu, Xiangwu Guo, Peiran Li, Weichen Zhang, Hengxu Wang, Mike Zheng Shou

The advent of Multimodal LLMs has significantly enhanced image OCR recognition capabilities, making GUI automation a viable reality for increasing efficiency in digital tasks. One fundamental aspect of developing a GUI automation system is understanding primitive GUI actions. This comprehension is crucial as it enables agents to learn from user demonstrations, an essential element of automation. To rigorously evaluate such capabilities, we developed a video captioning benchmark for GUI actions, comprising 4,189 diverse video captioning samples. This task presents unique challenges compared to natural scene video captioning: 1) GUI screenshots typically contain denser information than natural scenes, and 2) events within GUIs are subtler and occur more rapidly, requiring precise attention to the appropriate time span and spatial region for accurate understanding. To address these challenges, we introduce our GUI action dataset textbf{Act2Cap} as well as a simple yet effective framework, textbf{GUI Narrator}, for GUI video captioning that utilizes the cursor as a visual prompt to enhance the interpretation of high-resolution screenshots. Specifically, a cursor detector is trained on our dataset, and a multimodal LLM model with mechanisms for selecting keyframes and key regions generates the captions. Experimental results indicate that even for today's most advanced multimodal models, such as GPT-4o, the task remains highly challenging. Additionally, our evaluations show that our strategy effectively enhances model performance, whether integrated into the fine-tuning of open-source models or employed as a prompting strategy in closed-source models.

Read more

6/21/2024

VideoGUI: A Benchmark for GUI Automation from Instructional Videos
Total Score

0

VideoGUI: A Benchmark for GUI Automation from Instructional Videos

Kevin Qinghong Lin, Linjie Li, Difei Gao, Qinchen WU, Mingyi Yan, Zhengyuan Yang, Lijuan Wang, Mike Zheng Shou

Graphical User Interface (GUI) automation holds significant promise for enhancing human productivity by assisting with computer tasks. Existing task formulations primarily focus on simple tasks that can be specified by a single, language-only instruction, such as Insert a new slide. In this work, we introduce VideoGUI, a novel multi-modal benchmark designed to evaluate GUI assistants on visual-centric GUI tasks. Sourced from high-quality web instructional videos, our benchmark focuses on tasks involving professional and novel software (e.g., Adobe Photoshop or Stable Diffusion WebUI) and complex activities (e.g., video editing). VideoGUI evaluates GUI assistants through a hierarchical process, allowing for identification of the specific levels at which they may fail: (i) high-level planning: reconstruct procedural subtasks from visual conditions without language descriptions; (ii) middle-level planning: generate sequences of precise action narrations based on visual state (i.e., screenshot) and goals; (iii) atomic action execution: perform specific actions such as accurately clicking designated elements. For each level, we design evaluation metrics across individual dimensions to provide clear signals, such as individual performance in clicking, dragging, typing, and scrolling for atomic action execution. Our evaluation on VideoGUI reveals that even the SoTA large multimodal model GPT4o performs poorly on visual-centric GUI tasks, especially for high-level planning.

Read more

6/17/2024

👁️

Total Score

0

You Only Look at Screens: Multimodal Chain-of-Action Agents

Zhuosheng Zhang, Aston Zhang

Autonomous graphical user interface (GUI) agents aim to facilitate task automation by interacting with the user interface without manual intervention. Recent studies have investigated eliciting the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) for effective engagement in diverse environments. To align with the input-output requirement of LLMs, most existing approaches are developed under a sandbox setting where they rely on external tools and application-specific APIs to parse the environment into textual elements and interpret the predicted actions. Consequently, those approaches often grapple with inference inefficiency and error propagation risks. To mitigate the challenges, we introduce Auto-GUI, a multimodal solution that directly interacts with the interface, bypassing the need for environment parsing or reliance on application-dependent APIs. Moreover, we propose a chain-of-action technique -- leveraging a series of intermediate previous action histories and future action plans -- to help the agent decide what action to execute. We evaluate our approach on a new device-control benchmark AITW with 30$K$ unique instructions, spanning multi-step tasks such as application operation, web searching, and web shopping. Experimental results show that Auto-GUI achieves state-of-the-art performance with an action type prediction accuracy of 90% and an overall action success rate of 74%. Code is publicly available at https://github.com/cooelf/Auto-GUI.

Read more

6/10/2024

GUICourse: From General Vision Language Models to Versatile GUI Agents
Total Score

0

GUICourse: From General Vision Language Models to Versatile GUI Agents

Wentong Chen, Junbo Cui, Jinyi Hu, Yujia Qin, Junjie Fang, Yue Zhao, Chongyi Wang, Jun Liu, Guirong Chen, Yupeng Huo, Yuan Yao, Yankai Lin, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun

Utilizing Graphic User Interface (GUI) for human-computer interaction is essential for accessing a wide range of digital tools. Recent advancements in Vision Language Models (VLMs) highlight the compelling potential to develop versatile agents to help humans finish GUI navigation tasks. However, current VLMs are challenged in terms of fundamental abilities (OCR and grounding) and GUI knowledge (the functions and control methods of GUI elements), preventing them from becoming practical GUI agents. To solve these challenges, we contribute GUICourse, a suite of datasets to train visual-based GUI agents from general VLMs. First, we introduce the GUIEnv dataset to strengthen the OCR and grounding capabilities of VLMs. Then, we introduce the GUIAct and GUIChat datasets to enrich their knowledge of GUI components and interactions. Experiments demonstrate that our GUI agents have better performance on common GUI tasks than their baseline VLMs. Even the small-size GUI agent (with 3.1B parameters) can still work well on single-step and multi-step GUI tasks. Finally, we analyze the different varieties in the training stage of this agent by ablation study. Our source codes and datasets are released at https://github.com/yiye3/GUICourse.

Read more

6/18/2024