Harms in Repurposing Real-World Sensory Cues for Mixed Reality: A Causal Perspective

Overview

• The rise of Mixed Reality (MR) introduces new interactive techniques that blend virtual and physical environments.
• Emergent techniques repurpose everyday environments and sensory cues to support virtual content, creating a more immersive experience.
• However, this can also expose users to overlooked perceptual manipulations, where safety risks arise from misperception of real-world events.
• This work applies a causal inference perspective to understand the potential harms of repurposing real-world sensory cues for MR.

Plain English Explanation

Mixed Reality (MR) is a technology that allows virtual content to be overlayed onto the physical world, creating a more integrated and immersive experience. Researchers are developing new techniques that leverage everyday environments and sensory cues to enhance the virtual experience. For example, a strong wind in the real world could be mapped to trees swaying in the virtual world, creating a more unified experience.

While these techniques can increase immersion, they also introduce potential risks. By repurposing real-world sensory cues, users may experience perceptual manipulations where they misjudge or misunderstand actual events in their physical environment. This could lead to safety hazards if users mistake virtual elements for real-world phenomena.

To address this, the researchers in this work take a "causal inference" perspective. They view the MR experience as a process where the user interprets cues from both the virtual and physical worlds. This lens can help MR designers and researchers better understand the potential harms of perceptual manipulation and find ways to mitigate them. By considering the causal relationships between virtual and real-world elements, they aim to develop MR systems that are safer and more transparent for users.

Technical Explanation

The paper explores how the rise of Mixed Reality (MR) has enabled new interactive techniques that blend virtual and physical environments. Researchers have developed methods to repurpose everyday sensory cues from the real world to enhance the virtual experience. For instance, mapping a real-world wind gust to the movement of virtual trees can create a more unified and immersive MR scenario.

While these techniques can increase user immersion, the authors argue that they also expose users to potential perceptual manipulations. By misinterpreting real-world events as part of the virtual experience, users may face safety risks. The paper takes a causal inference perspective to understand these harms, viewing the MR experience as a process of interpreting cues from both the virtual and physical environments.

The authors propose that this lens can help MR designers and researchers gain new insights into the potential dangers of perceptual manipulation. By considering the causal relationships between virtual and real-world elements, they aim to develop MR systems that are more transparent and safer for users. This aligns with the broader goal of transitioning MR towards an everyday computing paradigm that seamlessly integrates with our physical lives.

Critical Analysis

The paper raises important concerns about the potential harms of perceptual manipulation in Mixed Reality experiences. By repurposing real-world sensory cues, MR designers may inadvertently create situations where users misunderstand the true nature of their physical environment, leading to safety risks.

The causal inference perspective proposed by the authors is a promising approach to address these issues. By analyzing the complex interactions between virtual and real-world elements, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of how users interpret and respond to these blended experiences. This could inform the development of proactive interventions to mitigate harmful perceptions and behaviors.

However, the paper does not provide detailed examples or case studies to illustrate the specific types of perceptual manipulations that can occur in MR. More empirical research may be needed to fully understand the range of potential harms and the effectiveness of the causal inference approach in addressing them.

Additionally, the paper focuses on the risks of perceptual manipulation, but does not extensively discuss the potential benefits of repurposing real-world cues for MR experiences. There may be opportunities to leverage these techniques in ways that enhance user safety and wellbeing, rather than compromise it. Further exploration of the trade-offs and design principles could yield valuable insights.

Conclusion

This work highlights the need to carefully consider the potential harms of perceptual manipulation in Mixed Reality as the technology continues to advance. By applying a causal inference perspective, researchers can gain new insights into how users interpret blended virtual and physical environments, and develop strategies to mitigate the risks of misperception.

As MR transitions towards becoming an everyday computing paradigm, addressing these safety and transparency concerns will be crucial. Continued research and thoughtful design approaches can help ensure that the benefits of immersive MR experiences are not undermined by unintended consequences.