A HAT Trick: Automatically Verifying Representation Invariants Using Symbolic Finite Automata
0
📊
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Functional programming often relies on stateful libraries that hide internal state behind abstractions
- Data structure implementations commonly use these stateful libraries to achieve efficiency and scalability
- However, enforcing application-level invariants can be challenging due to the opaque nature of the library state
- This paper proposes using symbolic finite automata (SFAs) to specify and verify representation invariants of data structures built on stateful libraries
Plain English Explanation
Functional programming is a style of coding where programs are built from pure functions that don't modify any underlying state. This can make programs easier to reason about and maintain. However, many real-world applications still need to work with stateful components, like databases or file systems, that keep track of information that changes over time.
These stateful libraries provide useful functionality, but their inner workings are often hidden from the application code. This can make it tricky to ensure that the overall application behaves correctly, since the application has to work around the library's internal state in ways that may not be obvious.
The authors of this paper looked at one common type of application that relies on stateful libraries - data structures like lists, trees, or hash tables. These data structures need to maintain certain internal invariants (rules about their structure) to function properly. But when the data structure is built on top of a black-box stateful library, enforcing those invariants becomes challenging.
The researchers propose using a mathematical model called a "symbolic finite automaton" (SFA) to precisely specify and verify the invariants of data structures that depend on stateful libraries. SFAs can capture the complex histories of interactions between the application code and the library, allowing the invariants to be checked rigorously.
The paper describes a type system called "Hoare Automata Types" (HATs) that integrates SFAs to enable modular reasoning about these kinds of stateful data structures. HATs allow the invariants to be formally specified and automatically verified, even when the data structure implementation relies on the hidden state of an external library.
Technical Explanation
The key technical contribution of this paper is the development of Hoare Automata Types (HATs), which combine symbolic finite automata (SFAs) and refinement types to specify and verify representation invariants for stateful data structures.
SFAs are a formal model that can compactly capture temporal and data-dependent histories of interactions between functional client code and stateful library methods. The authors show how SFAs can be used to precisely express the complex invariants that must hold for data structures built on top of opaque library state.
To enable modular reasoning, the paper integrates SFAs into a refinement type system. HATs allow the representation invariants of a data type to be specified declaratively, separately from the data structure implementation. The type system can then automatically check that the implementation upholds these invariants, even when it relies on stateful library methods.
The paper also presents a new bidirectional type checking algorithm that can efficiently decide subtyping inclusion between HATs. This allows HAT-specified data structure implementations to be compiled into a format suitable for automated SMT-based verification.
The researchers evaluate their HAT type system by applying it to verify several OCaml data structure implementations that leverage stateful libraries. The experimental results demonstrate the feasibility of type-checking complex invariants in this setting.
Critical Analysis
The authors convincingly demonstrate the power of their HAT type system for specifying and verifying representation invariants of stateful data structures. By encapsulating the interaction histories with SFAs, HATs provide a principled way to reason about these complex invariants in a modular fashion.
One potential limitation is the reliance on SMT solvers for the automated verification. While the authors report good performance, the scalability and tractability of this approach for very large or intricate data structures remains an open question. Extending the HAT framework to leverage other verification techniques, such as interactive theorem proving, could further improve its applicability.
Additionally, the paper focuses on a particular class of data structure implementations that rely on stateful libraries. It would be valuable to explore how the HAT approach generalizes to other kinds of stateful computations, such as those found in concurrent or distributed systems.
Overall, this work takes an important step towards enabling rigorous verification of stateful functional programs. The HAT type system provides a promising foundation for further research into practical techniques for specifying and ensuring rich invariants in the presence of hidden state.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach, called Hoare Automata Types (HATs), for specifying and verifying representation invariants of functional data structures that are built on top of stateful libraries. By integrating symbolic finite automata into a refinement type system, HATs allow developers to declaratively capture complex temporal and data-dependent histories of interactions between client code and opaque library state.
The authors demonstrate the practical applicability of their framework through an implementation that can automatically type-check sophisticated data structure implementations in OCaml. This work advances the state of the art in reasoning about stateful functional programs, and lays the groundwork for further research into techniques for ensuring the correctness of complex stateful computations.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📊
0
A HAT Trick: Automatically Verifying Representation Invariants Using Symbolic Finite Automata
Zhe Zhou, Qianchuan Ye, Benjamin Delaware, Suresh Jagannathan
Functional programs typically interact with stateful libraries that hide state behind typed abstractions. One particularly important class of applications are data structure implementations that rely on such libraries to provide a level of efficiency and scalability that may be otherwise difficult to achieve. However, because the specifications of the methods provided by these libraries are necessarily general and rarely specialized to the needs of any specific client, any required application-level invariants must often be expressed in terms of additional constraints on the (often) opaque state maintained by the library. In this paper, we consider the specification and verification of such representation invariants using symbolic finite automata (SFA). We show that SFAs can be used to succinctly and precisely capture fine-grained temporal and data-dependent histories of interactions between functional clients and stateful libraries. To facilitate modular and compositional reasoning, we integrate SFAs into a refinement type system to qualify stateful computations resulting from such interactions. The particular instantiation we consider, Hoare Automata Types (HATs), allows us to both specify and automatically type-check the representation invariants of a datatype, even when its implementation depends on stateful library methods that operate over hidden state. We also develop a new bidirectional type checking algorithm that implements an efficient subtyping inclusion check over HATs, enabling their translation into a form amenable for SMT-based automated verification. We present extensive experimental results on an implementation of this algorithm that demonstrates the feasibility of type-checking complex and sophisticated HAT-specified OCaml data structure implementations.
Read more4/3/2024
0
On-the-fly Synthesis for LTL over Finite Traces: An Efficient Approach that Counts
Shengping Xiao, Yongkang Li, Shufang Zhu, Jun Sun, Jianwen Li, Geguang Pu, Moshe Y. Vardi
We present an on-the-fly synthesis framework for Linear Temporal Logic over finite traces (LTLf) based on top-down deterministic automata construction. Existing approaches rely on constructing a complete Deterministic Finite Automaton (DFA) corresponding to the LTLf specification, a process with doubly exponential complexity relative to the formula size in the worst case. In this case, the synthesis procedure cannot be conducted until the entire DFA is constructed. This inefficiency is the main bottleneck of existing approaches. To address this challenge, we first present a method for converting LTLf into Transition-based DFA (TDFA) by directly leveraging LTLf semantics, incorporating intermediate results as direct components of the final automaton to enable parallelized synthesis and automata construction. We then explore the relationship between LTLf synthesis and TDFA games and subsequently develop an algorithm for performing LTLf synthesis using on-the-fly TDFA game solving. This algorithm traverses the state space in a global forward manner combined with a local backward method, along with the detection of strongly connected components. Moreover, we introduce two optimization techniques -- model-guided synthesis and state entailment -- to enhance the practical efficiency of our approach. Experimental results demonstrate that our on-the-fly approach achieves the best performance on the tested benchmarks and effectively complements existing tools and approaches.
Read more8/15/2024
0
A Framework for Quantum Finite-State Languages with Density Mapping
SeungYeop Baik, Sicheol Sung, Yo-Sub Han
A quantum finite-state automaton (QFA) is a theoretical model designed to simulate the evolution of a quantum system with finite memory in response to sequential input strings. We define the language of a QFA as the set of strings that lead the QFA to an accepting state when processed from its initial state. QFAs exemplify how quantum computing can achieve greater efficiency compared to classical computing. While being one of the simplest quantum models, QFAs are still notably challenging to construct from scratch due to the preliminary knowledge of quantum mechanics required for superimposing unitary constraints on the automata. Furthermore, even when QFAs are correctly assembled, the limitations of a current quantum computer may cause fluctuations in the simulation results depending on how an assembled QFA is translated into a quantum circuit. We present a framework that provides a simple and intuitive way to build QFAs and maximize the simulation accuracy. Our framework relies on two methods: First, it offers a predefined construction for foundational types of QFAs that recognize special languages MOD and EQU. They play a role of basic building blocks for more complex QFAs. In other words, one can obtain more complex QFAs from these foundational automata using standard language operations. Second, we improve the simulation accuracy by converting these QFAs into quantum circuits such that the resulting circuits perform well on noisy quantum computers. Our framework is available at https://github.com/sybaik1/qfa-toolkit.
Read more7/4/2024
📈
0
Regular Model Checking Upside-Down: An Invariant-Based Approach
Javier Esparza, Mikhail Raskin, Christoph Welzel-Mohr
Regular model checking is a well-established technique for the verification of infinite-state systems whose configurations can be represented as finite words over a suitable alphabet. It applies to systems whose set of initial configurations is regular, and whose transition relation is captured by a length-preserving transducer. To verify safety properties, regular model checking iteratively computes automata recognizing increasingly larger regular sets of reachable configurations, and checks if they contain unsafe configurations. Since this procedure often does not terminate, acceleration, abstraction, and widening techniques have been developed to compute a regular superset of the set of reachable configurations. In this paper we develop a complementary approach. Instead of approaching the set of reachable configurations from below, we start with the set of all configurations and compute increasingly smaller regular supersets of it. We use that the set of reachable configurations is equal to the intersection of all inductive invariants of the system. Since the intersection is in general non-regular, we introduce $b$-bounded invariants, defined as those representable by CNF-formulas with at most $b$ clauses. We prove that, for every $b geq 0$, the intersection of all $b$-bounded inductive invariants is regular, and show how to construct an automaton recognizing it. We study the complexity of deciding if this automaton accepts some unsafe configuration. We show that the problem is in textsc{EXPSPACE} for every $b geq 0$, and textsc{PSPACE}-complete for $b=1$. Finally, we study how large must $b$ be to prove safety properties of a number of benchmarks.
Read more7/31/2024