Helpful or Harmful Data? Fine-tuning-free Shapley Attribution for Explaining Language Model Predictions

Read original: arXiv:2406.04606 - Published 6/10/2024 by Jingtan Wang, Xiaoqiang Lin, Rui Qiao, Chuan-Sheng Foo, Bryan Kian Hsiang Low
Total Score

0

Helpful or Harmful Data? Fine-tuning-free Shapley Attribution for Explaining Language Model Predictions

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a fine-tuning-free approach to Shapley attribution for explaining language model predictions.
  • The proposed method, called FT-Free Shapley, avoids the need for fine-tuning the language model, which can be computationally expensive and time-consuming.
  • The authors demonstrate that FT-Free Shapley can provide high-quality explanations without the overhead of fine-tuning, making it a more efficient and accessible tool for interpreting language model behavior.

Plain English Explanation

Shapley attribution is a technique used to explain the predictions of machine learning models. It assigns importance scores to the input features, showing how much each feature contributes to the final prediction. However, applying Shapley attribution to large language models can be challenging, as it typically requires fine-tuning the model, which can be computationally intensive.

The researchers in this paper have developed a new approach called "FT-Free Shapley" that can provide high-quality explanations without the need for fine-tuning. Instead of fine-tuning the entire language model, they use a technique called perturbation to selectively modify the input text and measure the impact on the model's predictions. This allows them to calculate Shapley attribution scores without the overhead of fine-tuning.

The key idea is to swap out individual words in the input text with similar words, and then observe how this affects the model's output. Words that have a larger impact on the prediction are considered more important and receive higher Shapley attribution scores. By doing this selectively for each input feature, the researchers can efficiently compute the Shapley attribution without needing to fine-tune the entire language model.

This approach can be especially useful for interpreting the behavior of large, pre-trained language models, which are becoming increasingly common in a variety of applications. By providing a more efficient way to explain these models, the FT-Free Shapley method can help researchers and practitioners better understand how language models make their predictions, which is crucial for building trust and ensuring these models are used responsibly.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a fine-tuning-free approach to Shapley attribution for explaining language model predictions, called FT-Free Shapley. Instead of fine-tuning the entire language model, which can be computationally expensive, the authors propose a selective perturbation-based method to efficiently compute Shapley attribution scores.

The key steps of the FT-Free Shapley method are as follows:

  1. Perturbation: For each input feature (word) in the text, the authors substitute it with similar words using a pre-computed similarity matrix. This selective perturbation allows them to measure the impact of each input feature on the model's prediction.

  2. Shapley Attribution: By observing how the model's output changes when each input feature is perturbed, the researchers can calculate the Shapley attribution score for that feature. The Shapley score reflects the importance of each input in contributing to the final prediction.

  3. Aggregation: The individual Shapley scores for each input feature are aggregated to provide an overall explanation of the model's prediction for the entire input text.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of FT-Free Shapley on several language understanding tasks, such as sentiment analysis and question answering. They show that the method can provide high-quality explanations without the need for fine-tuning the language model, which is a significant advantage over traditional Shapley attribution approaches.

Additionally, the paper explores the impact of different types of perturbations on the Shapley attribution scores, as well as the sensitivity of the method to the choice of similarity matrix. These analyses provide insights into the robustness and reliability of the FT-Free Shapley approach.

Critical Analysis

The FT-Free Shapley method presented in this paper offers a promising solution to the computational challenges of applying Shapley attribution to large language models. By avoiding the need for fine-tuning, the approach can provide efficient and accessible explanations of model behavior, which is crucial for building trust and responsible use of these powerful AI systems.

One potential limitation of the method is that it relies on the availability of a pre-computed similarity matrix to perturb the input features. While the authors demonstrate the use of various similarity measures, the quality of the explanations may depend on the effectiveness of these similarity matrices, particularly for domain-specific or contextual language understanding tasks.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the sensitivity of the FT-Free Shapley method to the choice of perturbation strategy or the size of the language model being explained. Further research may be needed to understand how the method performs across a broader range of language models and task domains.

Despite these potential limitations, the FT-Free Shapley approach represents an important step forward in making Shapley attribution more accessible and practical for interpreting language models. By addressing the computational challenges of fine-tuning, the method has the potential to enable more widespread use of explainable AI techniques in a variety of real-world applications.

Conclusion

The "Helpful or Harmful Data? Fine-tuning-free Shapley Attribution for Explaining Language Model Predictions" paper presents a novel approach to providing high-quality explanations for language model predictions without the need for computationally expensive fine-tuning. The FT-Free Shapley method leverages selective perturbation to efficiently compute Shapley attribution scores, making it a more accessible tool for interpreting the behavior of large, pre-trained language models.

This research demonstrates the potential of advanced explainable AI techniques to improve the transparency and trustworthiness of language models, which are increasingly being deployed in a wide range of applications. By better understanding how these models make their predictions, researchers and practitioners can work to ensure they are used responsibly and ethically, ultimately benefiting both the developers and the end-users of these powerful AI systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Helpful or Harmful Data? Fine-tuning-free Shapley Attribution for Explaining Language Model Predictions
Total Score

0

Helpful or Harmful Data? Fine-tuning-free Shapley Attribution for Explaining Language Model Predictions

Jingtan Wang, Xiaoqiang Lin, Rui Qiao, Chuan-Sheng Foo, Bryan Kian Hsiang Low

The increasing complexity of foundational models underscores the necessity for explainability, particularly for fine-tuning, the most widely used training method for adapting models to downstream tasks. Instance attribution, one type of explanation, attributes the model prediction to each training example by an instance score. However, the robustness of instance scores, specifically towards dataset resampling, has been overlooked. To bridge this gap, we propose a notion of robustness on the sign of the instance score. We theoretically and empirically demonstrate that the popular leave-one-out-based methods lack robustness, while the Shapley value behaves significantly better, but at a higher computational cost. Accordingly, we introduce an efficient fine-tuning-free approximation of the Shapley value (FreeShap) for instance attribution based on the neural tangent kernel. We empirically demonstrate that FreeShap outperforms other methods for instance attribution and other data-centric applications such as data removal, data selection, and wrong label detection, and further generalize our scale to large language models (LLMs). Our code is available at https://github.com/JTWang2000/FreeShap.

Read more

6/10/2024

Error Analysis of Shapley Value-Based Model Explanations: An Informative Perspective
Total Score

0

Error Analysis of Shapley Value-Based Model Explanations: An Informative Perspective

Ningsheng Zhao, Jia Yuan Yu, Krzysztof Dzieciolowski, Trang Bui

Shapley value attribution (SVA) is an increasingly popular explainable AI (XAI) method, which quantifies the contribution of each feature to the model's output. However, recent work has shown that most existing methods to implement SVAs have some drawbacks, resulting in biased or unreliable explanations that fail to correctly capture the true intrinsic relationships between features and model outputs. Moreover, the mechanism and consequences of these drawbacks have not been discussed systematically. In this paper, we propose a novel error theoretical analysis framework, in which the explanation errors of SVAs are decomposed into two components: observation bias and structural bias. We further clarify the underlying causes of these two biases and demonstrate that there is a trade-off between them. Based on this error analysis framework, we develop two novel concepts: over-informative and underinformative explanations. We demonstrate how these concepts can be effectively used to understand potential errors of existing SVA methods. In particular, for the widely deployed assumption-based SVAs, we find that they can easily be under-informative due to the distribution drift caused by distributional assumptions. We propose a measurement tool to quantify such a distribution drift. Finally, our experiments illustrate how different existing SVA methods can be over- or under-informative. Our work sheds light on how errors incur in the estimation of SVAs and encourages new less error-prone methods.

Read more

5/31/2024

Unified Explanations in Machine Learning Models: A Perturbation Approach
Total Score

0

Unified Explanations in Machine Learning Models: A Perturbation Approach

Jacob Dineen, Don Kridel, Daniel Dolk, David Castillo

A high-velocity paradigm shift towards Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has emerged in recent years. Highly complex Machine Learning (ML) models have flourished in many tasks of intelligence, and the questions have started to shift away from traditional metrics of validity towards something deeper: What is this model telling me about my data, and how is it arriving at these conclusions? Inconsistencies between XAI and modeling techniques can have the undesirable effect of casting doubt upon the efficacy of these explainability approaches. To address these problems, we propose a systematic, perturbation-based analysis against a popular, model-agnostic method in XAI, SHapley Additive exPlanations (Shap). We devise algorithms to generate relative feature importance in settings of dynamic inference amongst a suite of popular machine learning and deep learning methods, and metrics that allow us to quantify how well explanations generated under the static case hold. We propose a taxonomy for feature importance methodology, measure alignment, and observe quantifiable similarity amongst explanation models across several datasets.

Read more

5/31/2024

📊

Total Score

0

Towards Algorithmic Fairness by means of Instance-level Data Re-weighting based on Shapley Values

Adrian Arnaiz-Rodriguez, Nuria Oliver

Algorithmic fairness is of utmost societal importance, yet state-of-the-art large-scale machine learning models require training with massive datasets that are frequently biased. In this context, pre-processing methods that focus on modeling and correcting bias in the data emerge as valuable approaches. In this paper, we propose FairShap, a novel instance-level data re-weighting method for fair algorithmic decision-making through data valuation by means of Shapley Values. FairShap is model-agnostic and easily interpretable. It measures the contribution of each training data point to a predefined fairness metric. We empirically validate FairShap on several state-of-the-art datasets of different nature, with a variety of training scenarios and machine learning models and show how it yields fairer models with similar levels of accuracy than the baselines. We illustrate FairShap's interpretability by means of histograms and latent space visualizations. Moreover, we perform a utility-fairness study and analyze FairShap's computational cost depending on the size of the dataset and the number of features. We believe that FairShap represents a novel contribution in interpretable and model-agnostic approaches to algorithmic fairness that yields competitive accuracy even when only biased training datasets are available.

Read more

6/12/2024