A Hierarchical Neural Framework for Classification and its Explanation in Large Unstructured Legal Documents

Read original: arXiv:2309.10563 - Published 7/1/2024 by Nishchal Prasad, Mohand Boughanem, Taoufik Dkaki
Total Score

0

🧠

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Legal document analysis and judgment prediction is challenging due to the long, unstructured nature of legal texts
  • Existing approaches struggle with these challenges, especially on documents without structural annotations
  • The paper proposes a deep learning-based framework called MESc to tackle this problem, along with an explainability algorithm called ORSE

Plain English Explanation

The paper addresses a significant challenge in the legal domain: automatically predicting legal judgments from long, complex documents. Traditional methods have struggled with this task, especially when the documents have no clear structure or annotations.

To overcome these challenges, the researchers developed a deep learning-based framework called MESc (Multi-stage Encoder-based Supervised with-clustering). MESc leverages large language models like GPT-Neo and GPT-J, which have been pre-trained on vast amounts of text data, to effectively process and understand the legal texts. The paper explores how well these models can adapt to the legal domain and how their capabilities can be further enhanced through transfer learning.

In addition to the judgment prediction framework, the researchers also propose an explainability algorithm called ORSE (Occlusion sensitivity-based Relevant Sentence Extractor). ORSE aims to provide explanations for the model's predictions by identifying the most relevant sentences from the input document. This is particularly important in the legal domain, where understanding the reasoning behind decisions is crucial.

The researchers conduct extensive experiments on legal documents from India, the European Union, and the United States, using datasets like ILDC and LexGLUE. They demonstrate that their MESc framework outperforms previous state-of-the-art methods by at least 2 points in overall performance. Additionally, the ORSE algorithm achieves a 50% average gain in explainability scores compared to baseline methods.

Technical Explanation

The paper addresses the challenge of automatically predicting legal judgments from long, unstructured legal documents, which can often exceed tens of thousands of words and lack consistent structural annotations. The researchers define this as the "scarce annotated legal documents" problem and explore the lack of structural information and the long lengths of these documents.

To tackle this problem, the researchers propose a deep learning-based classification framework called MESc (Multi-stage Encoder-based Supervised with-clustering). MESc leverages large language models (LLMs) with multi-billion parameters, such as GPT-Neo and GPT-J, to effectively process and understand the legal texts. The paper explores the adaptability of these LLMs to legal texts and their intra-domain (legal) transfer learning capacity.

Additionally, the researchers compare the performance and adaptability of MESc and the impact of combining embeddings from the last layers of the LLMs. For the hierarchical MESc model, they also propose an explanation extraction algorithm called ORSE (Occlusion sensitivity-based Relevant Sentence Extractor). ORSE uses the input-occlusion sensitivity of the model to identify the most relevant sentences from the document that explain the predictions.

The researchers conduct extensive experiments and ablation studies on legal documents from India, the European Union, and the United States, using the ILDC dataset and a subset of the LexGLUE dataset. The results show that MESc achieves a minimum total performance gain of approximately 2 points over previous state-of-the-art proposed methods. Furthermore, the ORSE algorithm applied to MESc achieves a total average gain of 50% over the baseline explainability scores.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and promising approach to addressing the challenges of legal document analysis and judgment prediction. The researchers' use of large language models and their exploration of transfer learning within the legal domain are particularly noteworthy, as they demonstrate the potential of these techniques to overcome the limitations of traditional methods.

However, the paper does not address certain limitations or potential issues. For example, the researchers do not discuss the computational and resource requirements of the MESc framework, which could be a concern for real-world deployment, especially in resource-constrained environments. Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential biases or fairness implications of the proposed models, which is an important consideration in the legal domain.

Furthermore, the researchers could have delved deeper into the specific features or characteristics of the legal texts that contribute to the performance of the MESc framework and the ORSE explainability algorithm. Understanding these factors could lead to further improvements and insights into the unique challenges of legal document analysis.

Despite these limitations, the paper presents a significant contribution to the field of legal document analysis and judgment prediction. The researchers' work highlights the potential of deep learning and large language models to tackle complex challenges in the legal domain, and the ORSE explainability algorithm offers a promising approach to providing transparency and interpretability in legal decision-making.

Conclusion

The paper addresses a critical challenge in the legal domain: the automatic prediction of judgments from long, unstructured legal documents. The researchers propose a deep learning-based framework called MESc, which leverages large language models and transfer learning to effectively process and understand legal texts. Additionally, they introduce the ORSE explainability algorithm to provide insights into the reasoning behind the model's predictions.

The researchers' extensive experiments on legal datasets from various jurisdictions demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach, with MESc outperforming previous state-of-the-art methods and ORSE achieving significant gains in explainability scores. This work highlights the potential of deep learning and large language models to revolutionize legal document analysis and decision-making, potentially leading to more efficient and transparent legal processes.

While the paper presents some limitations, it offers a valuable contribution to the field and paves the way for future research in this important area. As the legal system continues to grapple with the challenges of digital transformation, the insights and techniques presented in this paper could be instrumental in developing more sophisticated and reliable legal document analysis tools.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🧠

Total Score

0

A Hierarchical Neural Framework for Classification and its Explanation in Large Unstructured Legal Documents

Nishchal Prasad, Mohand Boughanem, Taoufik Dkaki

Automatic legal judgment prediction and its explanation suffer from the problem of long case documents exceeding tens of thousands of words, in general, and having a non-uniform structure. Predicting judgments from such documents and extracting their explanation becomes a challenging task, more so on documents with no structural annotation. We define this problem as scarce annotated legal documents and explore their lack of structural information and their long lengths with a deep-learning-based classification framework which we call MESc; Multi-stage Encoder-based Supervised with-clustering; for judgment prediction. We explore the adaptability of LLMs with multi-billion parameters (GPT-Neo, and GPT-J) to legal texts and their intra-domain(legal) transfer learning capacity. Alongside this, we compare their performance and adaptability with MESc and the impact of combining embeddings from their last layers. For such hierarchical models, we also propose an explanation extraction algorithm named ORSE; Occlusion sensitivity-based Relevant Sentence Extractor; based on the input-occlusion sensitivity of the model, to explain the predictions with the most relevant sentences from the document. We explore these methods and test their effectiveness with extensive experiments and ablation studies on legal documents from India, the European Union, and the United States with the ILDC dataset and a subset of the LexGLUE dataset. MESc achieves a minimum total performance gain of approximately 2 points over previous state-of-the-art proposed methods, while ORSE applied on MESc achieves a total average gain of 50% over the baseline explainability scores.

Read more

7/1/2024

Explainable machine learning multi-label classification of Spanish legal judgements
Total Score

0

Explainable machine learning multi-label classification of Spanish legal judgements

Francisco de Arriba-P'erez, Silvia Garc'ia-M'endez, Francisco J. Gonz'alez-Casta~no, Jaime Gonz'alez-Gonz'alez

Artificial Intelligence techniques such as Machine Learning (ML) have not been exploited to their maximum potential in the legal domain. This has been partially due to the insufficient explanations they provided about their decisions. Automatic expert systems with explanatory capabilities can be specially useful when legal practitioners search jurisprudence to gather contextual knowledge for their cases. Therefore, we propose a hybrid system that applies ML for multi-label classification of judgements (sentences) and visual and natural language descriptions for explanation purposes, boosted by Natural Language Processing techniques and deep legal reasoning to identify the entities, such as the parties, involved. We are not aware of any prior work on automatic multi-label classification of legal judgements also providing natural language explanations to the end-users with comparable overall quality. Our solution achieves over 85 % micro precision on a labelled data set annotated by legal experts. This endorses its interest to relieve human experts from monotonous labour-intensive legal classification tasks.

Read more

5/29/2024

A Small Claims Court for the NLP: Judging Legal Text Classification Strategies With Small Datasets
Total Score

0

A Small Claims Court for the NLP: Judging Legal Text Classification Strategies With Small Datasets

Mariana Yukari Noguti, Edduardo Vellasques, Luiz Eduardo Soares Oliveira

Recent advances in language modelling has significantly decreased the need of labelled data in text classification tasks. Transformer-based models, pre-trained on unlabeled data, can outmatch the performance of models trained from scratch for each task. However, the amount of labelled data need to fine-tune such type of model is still considerably high for domains requiring expert-level annotators, like the legal domain. This paper investigates the best strategies for optimizing the use of a small labeled dataset and large amounts of unlabeled data and perform a classification task in the legal area with 50 predefined topics. More specifically, we use the records of demands to a Brazilian Public Prosecutor's Office aiming to assign the descriptions in one of the subjects, which currently demands deep legal knowledge for manual filling. The task of optimizing the performance of classifiers in this scenario is especially challenging, given the low amount of resources available regarding the Portuguese language, especially in the legal domain. Our results demonstrate that classic supervised models such as logistic regression and SVM and the ensembles random forest and gradient boosting achieve better performance along with embeddings extracted with word2vec when compared to BERT language model. The latter demonstrates superior performance in association with the architecture of the model itself as a classifier, having surpassed all previous models in that regard. The best result was obtained with Unsupervised Data Augmentation (UDA), which jointly uses BERT, data augmentation, and strategies of semi-supervised learning, with an accuracy of 80.7% in the aforementioned task.

Read more

9/11/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Large Language Models for Judicial Entity Extraction: A Comparative Study

Atin Sakkeer Hussain, Anu Thomas

Domain-specific Entity Recognition holds significant importance in legal contexts, serving as a fundamental task that supports various applications such as question-answering systems, text summarization, machine translation, sentiment analysis, and information retrieval specifically within case law documents. Recent advancements have highlighted the efficacy of Large Language Models in natural language processing tasks, demonstrating their capability to accurately detect and classify domain-specific facts (entities) from specialized texts like clinical and financial documents. This research investigates the application of Large Language Models in identifying domain-specific entities (e.g., courts, petitioner, judge, lawyer, respondents, FIR nos.) within case law documents, with a specific focus on their aptitude for handling domain-specific language complexity and contextual variations. The study evaluates the performance of state-of-the-art Large Language Model architectures, including Large Language Model Meta AI 3, Mistral, and Gemma, in the context of extracting judicial facts tailored to Indian judicial texts. Mistral and Gemma emerged as the top-performing models, showcasing balanced precision and recall crucial for accurate entity identification. These findings confirm the value of Large Language Models in judicial documents and demonstrate how they can facilitate and quicken scientific research by producing precise, organised data outputs that are appropriate for in-depth examination.

Read more

7/9/2024