A Small Claims Court for the NLP: Judging Legal Text Classification Strategies With Small Datasets
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores strategies for text classification in legal domains with small datasets.
- It focuses on comparing different machine learning techniques and their performance on legal text classification tasks.
- The research aims to provide insights for practitioners working with limited data in the legal field.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at ways to classify legal texts, like court documents or contracts, when you don't have a lot of data to train your machine learning models. This is a common challenge in the legal field, where the data can be scarce or difficult to access.
The researchers tested different machine learning techniques to see which ones work best for legal text classification with small datasets. They compared things like text-clustering-applied-to-data-augmentation-legal and lawma-power-specialization-legal-tasks. The goal was to find strategies that can help legal professionals and researchers make the most of the limited data they have available.
Technical Explanation
The paper evaluates various explainable-machine-learning-multi-label-classification-spanish techniques for classifying legal texts, including traditional machine learning models like support vector machines (SVMs) and logistic regression, as well as more recent neural network-based approaches like leveraging-large-language-models-knowledge-free-weak.
The researchers tested these methods on several small legal text datasets, measuring their performance in terms of accuracy, F1-score, and other relevant metrics. They also explored data augmentation techniques, such as text clustering, to see if they could boost the models' performance on the limited data.
The results suggest that a combination of traditional machine learning models and transfer learning-based approaches can be effective for legal text classification, even with small datasets. The paper provides insights into the trade-offs and best practices for practitioners working in this domain.
Critical Analysis
The paper acknowledges several limitations of the study, including the relatively small size of the datasets used and the fact that the experiments were conducted on only a few specific legal text classification tasks. The authors also note that the performance of the models may be heavily dependent on the quality and characteristics of the available data.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the potential ethical considerations or biases that may arise when applying these techniques to sensitive legal texts. Further research is needed to understand the broader implications and ensure that the use of these methods in the legal domain is responsible and fair.
Conclusion
This paper provides a valuable contribution to the field of natural language processing (NLP) by exploring strategies for text classification in the legal domain, where data scarcity is a significant challenge. The insights and lessons learned from this research can help practitioners and researchers in the legal field to make more effective use of limited data and improve their text classification capabilities.
The findings suggest that a combination of traditional machine learning models and transfer learning-based approaches can be a promising direction for legal text classification, and the paper offers a solid foundation for further exploration and refinement of these techniques.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A Small Claims Court for the NLP: Judging Legal Text Classification Strategies With Small Datasets
Mariana Yukari Noguti, Edduardo Vellasques, Luiz Eduardo Soares Oliveira
Recent advances in language modelling has significantly decreased the need of labelled data in text classification tasks. Transformer-based models, pre-trained on unlabeled data, can outmatch the performance of models trained from scratch for each task. However, the amount of labelled data need to fine-tune such type of model is still considerably high for domains requiring expert-level annotators, like the legal domain. This paper investigates the best strategies for optimizing the use of a small labeled dataset and large amounts of unlabeled data and perform a classification task in the legal area with 50 predefined topics. More specifically, we use the records of demands to a Brazilian Public Prosecutor's Office aiming to assign the descriptions in one of the subjects, which currently demands deep legal knowledge for manual filling. The task of optimizing the performance of classifiers in this scenario is especially challenging, given the low amount of resources available regarding the Portuguese language, especially in the legal domain. Our results demonstrate that classic supervised models such as logistic regression and SVM and the ensembles random forest and gradient boosting achieve better performance along with embeddings extracted with word2vec when compared to BERT language model. The latter demonstrates superior performance in association with the architecture of the model itself as a classifier, having surpassed all previous models in that regard. The best result was obtained with Unsupervised Data Augmentation (UDA), which jointly uses BERT, data augmentation, and strategies of semi-supervised learning, with an accuracy of 80.7% in the aforementioned task.
Read more9/11/2024
0
Text clustering applied to data augmentation in legal contexts
Lucas Jos'e Gonc{c}alves Freitas, Tha'is Rodrigues, Guilherme Rodrigues, Pamella Edokawa, Ariane Farias
Data analysis and machine learning are of preeminent importance in the legal domain, especially in tasks like clustering and text classification. In this study, we harnessed the power of natural language processing tools to enhance datasets meticulously curated by experts. This process significantly improved the classification workflow for legal texts using machine learning techniques. We considered the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) data from the United Nations 2030 Agenda as a practical case study. Data augmentation clustering-based strategy led to remarkable enhancements in the accuracy and sensitivity metrics of classification models. For certain SDGs within the 2030 Agenda, we observed performance gains of over 15%. In some cases, the example base expanded by a noteworthy factor of 5. When dealing with unclassified legal texts, data augmentation strategies centered around clustering prove to be highly effective. They provide a valuable means to expand the existing knowledge base without the need for labor-intensive manual classification efforts.
Read more4/16/2024
0
Lawma: The Power of Specialization for Legal Tasks
Ricardo Dominguez-Olmedo, Vedant Nanda, Rediet Abebe, Stefan Bechtold, Christoph Engel, Jens Frankenreiter, Krishna Gummadi, Moritz Hardt, Michael Livermore
Annotation and classification of legal text are central components of empirical legal research. Traditionally, these tasks are often delegated to trained research assistants. Motivated by the advances in language modeling, empirical legal scholars are increasingly turning to prompting commercial models, hoping that it will alleviate the significant cost of human annotation. Despite growing use, our understanding of how to best utilize large language models for legal tasks remains limited. We conduct a comprehensive study of 260 legal text classification tasks, nearly all new to the machine learning community. Starting from GPT-4 as a baseline, we show that it has non-trivial but highly varied zero-shot accuracy, often exhibiting performance that may be insufficient for legal work. We then demonstrate that a lightly fine-tuned Llama 3 model vastly outperforms GPT-4 on almost all tasks, typically by double-digit percentage points. We find that larger models respond better to fine-tuning than smaller models. A few tens to hundreds of examples suffice to achieve high classification accuracy. Notably, we can fine-tune a single model on all 260 tasks simultaneously at a small loss in accuracy relative to having a separate model for each task. Our work points to a viable alternative to the predominant practice of prompting commercial models. For concrete legal tasks with some available labeled data, researchers are better off using a fine-tuned open-source model.
Read more7/24/2024
0
Explainable machine learning multi-label classification of Spanish legal judgements
Francisco de Arriba-P'erez, Silvia Garc'ia-M'endez, Francisco J. Gonz'alez-Casta~no, Jaime Gonz'alez-Gonz'alez
Artificial Intelligence techniques such as Machine Learning (ML) have not been exploited to their maximum potential in the legal domain. This has been partially due to the insufficient explanations they provided about their decisions. Automatic expert systems with explanatory capabilities can be specially useful when legal practitioners search jurisprudence to gather contextual knowledge for their cases. Therefore, we propose a hybrid system that applies ML for multi-label classification of judgements (sentences) and visual and natural language descriptions for explanation purposes, boosted by Natural Language Processing techniques and deep legal reasoning to identify the entities, such as the parties, involved. We are not aware of any prior work on automatic multi-label classification of legal judgements also providing natural language explanations to the end-users with comparable overall quality. Our solution achieves over 85 % micro precision on a labelled data set annotated by legal experts. This endorses its interest to relieve human experts from monotonous labour-intensive legal classification tasks.
Read more5/29/2024