HIFuzz: Human Interaction Fuzzing for small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

Read original: arXiv:2310.12058 - Published 4/9/2024 by Theodore Chambers, Michael Vierhauser, Ankit Agrawal, Michael Murphy, Jason Matthew Brauer, Salil Purandare, Myra B. Cohen, Jane Cleland-Huang
Total Score

0

🖼️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Small Unmanned Aerial Systems (sUAS) must meet strict safety standards when used in high-stress emergency response scenarios
  • Many reported accidents have involved humans in the control loop
  • This paper presents the HiFuzz testing framework, which uses fuzz testing to identify system vulnerabilities related to human interactions

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses the challenge of ensuring the safety of small drones, also called sUAS, when they are used in high-pressure emergency response situations. Many accidents with these drones have been caused by mistakes made by the human operators controlling them. To address this, the researchers developed a testing framework called HiFuzz that uses a technique called fuzz testing to find weaknesses in the drone systems that could result from human errors.

HiFuzz includes three distinct levels that progress from a low-cost, limited-fidelity, large-scale, no-hazard environment, using fully simulated Proxy Human Agents, via an intermediate level, where proxy humans are replaced with real humans, to a high-stakes, high-cost, real-world environment. By applying HiFuzz to an autonomous multi-sUAS system, the researchers showed that each test level helps reveal different vulnerabilities and makes the system more robust to human mistakes.

While HiFuzz was designed for testing drone systems, the paper also discusses how this type of testing approach could be useful for other types of cyber-physical systems that involve interactions between humans and machines.

Technical Explanation

The HiFuzz testing framework uses fuzz testing to identify vulnerabilities in sUAS systems that arise from human interactions. It consists of three distinct testing levels:

  1. Low-cost, limited-fidelity, large-scale, no-hazard environment with simulated Proxy Human Agents: This level allows for extensive testing at low cost in a simulated environment without real-world risks.

  2. Intermediate level with real humans replacing the proxy agents: This level introduces real human operators to better understand how they interact with the system and identify associated vulnerabilities.

  3. High-stakes, high-cost, real-world environment: This final level tests the system in realistic, high-risk conditions to uncover any remaining issues before deployment.

By applying HiFuzz to an autonomous multi-sUAS system, the researchers demonstrated how each test level serves a unique purpose in revealing vulnerabilities and improving the system's robustness to human mistakes.

[The paper also discusses the potential for using the HiFuzz approach to test other cyber-physical systems beyond just sUAS, such as those described in related works on grasping stability analysis, securing the skies with IRS-assisted Area of Interest (AoI) awareness, fusing multi-sensor input for state information in TinyML, and ground-to-UAV 140 GHz channel measurement.](https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/high-fidelity-simulation-framework-grasping-stability-analysis, https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/securing-skies-irs-assisted-aoi-aware-secure, https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/fusing-multi-sensor-input-state-information-tinyml, https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/ground-to-uav-140-ghz-channel-measurement)

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive and thoughtful approach to testing the safety of sUAS systems in the presence of human operators. By using a multi-level testing framework, the researchers are able to systematically identify vulnerabilities at different stages of system development and deployment.

One potential limitation is the extent to which the simulated "Proxy Human Agents" in the first test level can accurately represent real human behavior and decision-making. While this level allows for extensive low-cost testing, the fidelity of the human models may impact the ability to fully uncover relevant vulnerabilities.

Additionally, the paper does not provide much detail on the specific types of vulnerabilities identified through the HiFuzz testing process. Further insights into the nature of these weaknesses and how they were addressed would help readers better understand the practical implications of this work.

Overall, the HiFuzz framework represents a valuable contribution to ensuring the safety of sUAS systems, and the authors' discussion of its potential applicability to other cyber-physical systems is an interesting avenue for future research and exploration.

Conclusion

This paper presents the HiFuzz testing framework, which uses fuzz testing to identify vulnerabilities in small Unmanned Aerial Systems (sUAS) that are associated with human interactions. By applying HiFuzz at three distinct levels of testing, from simulated environments to real-world conditions, the researchers demonstrated its effectiveness in revealing issues and improving the robustness of an autonomous multi-sUAS system.

The insights gained from this work have important implications for enhancing the safety and reliability of sUAS, particularly in high-stress emergency response scenarios where human errors can have serious consequences. Furthermore, the potential for applying the HiFuzz approach to other cyber-physical systems suggests its broader applicability in ensuring the safety of human-machine interactions across a range of technologies.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🖼️

Total Score

0

HIFuzz: Human Interaction Fuzzing for small Unmanned Aerial Vehicles

Theodore Chambers, Michael Vierhauser, Ankit Agrawal, Michael Murphy, Jason Matthew Brauer, Salil Purandare, Myra B. Cohen, Jane Cleland-Huang

Small Unmanned Aerial Systems (sUAS) must meet rigorous safety standards when deployed in high-stress emergency response scenarios; however many reported accidents have involved humans in the loop. In this paper, we, therefore, present the HiFuzz testing framework, which uses fuzz testing to identify system vulnerabilities associated with human interactions. HiFuzz includes three distinct levels that progress from a low-cost, limited-fidelity, large-scale, no-hazard environment, using fully simulated Proxy Human Agents, via an intermediate level, where proxy humans are replaced with real humans, to a high-stakes, high-cost, real-world environment. Through applying HiFuzz to an autonomous multi-sUAS system-under-test, we show that each test level serves a unique purpose in revealing vulnerabilities and making the system more robust with respect to human mistakes. While HiFuzz is designed for testing sUAS systems, we further discuss its potential for use in other Cyber-Physical Systems.

Read more

4/9/2024

An Open-source Hardware/Software Architecture and Supporting Simulation Environment to Perform Human FPV Flight Demonstrations for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Autonomy
Total Score

0

An Open-source Hardware/Software Architecture and Supporting Simulation Environment to Perform Human FPV Flight Demonstrations for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Autonomy

Haosong Xiao, Prajit Krisshnakumar, Jagadeswara P K V Pothuri, Puru Soni, Eric Butcher, Souma Chowdhury

Small multi-rotor unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), mainly quadcopters, are nowadays ubiquitous in research on aerial autonomy, including serving as scaled-down models for much larger aircraft such as vertical-take-off-and-lift vehicles for urban air mobility. Among the various research use cases, first-person-view RC flight experiments allow for collecting data on how human pilots fly such aircraft, which could then be used to compare, contrast, validate, or train autonomous flight agents. While this could be uniquely beneficial, especially for studying UAV operation in contextually complex and safety-critical environments such as in human-UAV shared spaces, the lack of inexpensive and open-source hardware/software platforms that offer this capability along with low-level access to the underlying control software and data remains limited. To address this gap and significantly reduce barriers to human-guided autonomy research with UAVs, this paper presents an open-source software architecture implemented with an inexpensive in-house built quadcopter platform based on the F450 Quadcopter Frame. This setup uses two cameras to provide a dual-view FPV and an open-source flight controller, Pixhawk. The underlying software architecture, developed using the Python-based Kivy library, allows logging telemetry, GPS, control inputs, and camera frame data in a synchronized manner on the ground station computer. Since costs (time) and weather constraints typically limit numbers of physical outdoor flight experiments, this paper also presents a unique AirSim/Unreal Engine based simulation environment and graphical user interface aka digital twin, that provides a Hardware In The Loop setup via the Pixhawk flight controller. We demonstrate the usability and reliability of the overall framework through a set of diverse physical FPV flight experiments and corresponding flight tests in the digital twin.

Read more

9/9/2024

Automated System-level Testing of Unmanned Aerial Systems
Total Score

0

Automated System-level Testing of Unmanned Aerial Systems

Hassan Sartaj, Asmar Muqeet, Muhammad Zohaib Iqbal, Muhammad Uzair Khan

Unmanned aerial systems (UAS) rely on various avionics systems that are safety-critical and mission-critical. A major requirement of international safety standards is to perform rigorous system-level testing of avionics software systems. The current industrial practice is to manually create test scenarios, manually/automatically execute these scenarios using simulators, and manually evaluate outcomes. The test scenarios typically consist of setting certain flight or environment conditions and testing the system under test in these settings. The state-of-the-art approaches for this purpose also require manual test scenario development and evaluation. In this paper, we propose a novel approach to automate the system-level testing of the UAS. The proposed approach (AITester) utilizes model-based testing and artificial intelligence (AI) techniques to automatically generate, execute, and evaluate various test scenarios. The test scenarios are generated on the fly, i.e., during test execution based on the environmental context at runtime. The approach is supported by a toolset. We empirically evaluate the proposed approach on two core components of UAS, an autopilot system of an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and cockpit display systems (CDS) of the ground control station (GCS). The results show that the AITester effectively generates test scenarios causing deviations from the expected behavior of the UAV autopilot and reveals potential flaws in the GCS-CDS.

Read more

8/6/2024

Dance of the ADS: Orchestrating Failures through Historically-Informed Scenario Fuzzing
Total Score

0

Dance of the ADS: Orchestrating Failures through Historically-Informed Scenario Fuzzing

Tong Wang, Taotao Gu, Huan Deng, Hu Li, Xiaohui Kuang, Gang Zhao

As autonomous driving systems (ADS) advance towards higher levels of autonomy, orchestrating their safety verification becomes increasingly intricate. This paper unveils ScenarioFuzz, a pioneering scenario-based fuzz testing methodology. Designed like a choreographer who understands the past performances, it uncovers vulnerabilities in ADS without the crutch of predefined scenarios. Leveraging map road networks, such as OPENDRIVE, we extract essential data to form a foundational scenario seed corpus. This corpus, enriched with pertinent information, provides the necessary boundaries for fuzz testing in the absence of starting scenarios. Our approach integrates specialized mutators and mutation techniques, combined with a graph neural network model, to predict and filter out high-risk scenario seeds, optimizing the fuzzing process using historical test data. Compared to other methods, our approach reduces the time cost by an average of 60.3%, while the number of error scenarios discovered per unit of time increases by 103%. Furthermore, we propose a self-supervised collision trajectory clustering method, which aids in identifying and summarizing 54 high-risk scenario categories prone to inducing ADS faults. Our experiments have successfully uncovered 58 bugs across six tested systems, emphasizing the critical safety concerns of ADS.

Read more

7/8/2024