Highlighting the Safety Concerns of Deploying LLMs/VLMs in Robotics

Read original: arXiv:2402.10340 - Published 6/18/2024 by Xiyang Wu, Souradip Chakraborty, Ruiqi Xian, Jing Liang, Tianrui Guan, Fuxiao Liu, Brian M. Sadler, Dinesh Manocha, Amrit Singh Bedi
Total Score

0

📶

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper highlights the critical issues of robustness and safety associated with integrating large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs) into robotics applications.
  • Recent research has focused on using LLMs and VLMs to improve the performance of robotics tasks, such as manipulation and navigation.
  • However, analyzing the safety of such systems remains underexplored, yet it is extremely critical, as LLMs and VLMs are highly susceptible to adversarial inputs.
  • The paper explores this issue thoroughly, presenting a mathematical formulation of potential attacks on LLM/VLM-based robotic systems and offering experimental evidence of the safety challenges.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs) are powerful AI systems that can be used to enhance the capabilities of robots, such as helping them understand and navigate their environment more effectively. [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/llm-driven-robots-risk-enacting-discrimination-violence] However, these models are also vulnerable to adversarial attacks, where small changes to their inputs can cause them to make significant mistakes. [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/safety-alignment-vision-language-models]

This is a major concern for robotics applications, as robots operate in the physical world, and any errors or malfunctions could result in serious consequences, such as property damage or even harm to people. [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/slm-as-guardian-pioneering-ai-safety-small] The paper explores this issue in depth, using math and experiments to show how simple changes to the input can greatly reduce the effectiveness of LLM/VLM-based robotic systems.

For example, the researchers found that minor modifications to the input prompt could lead to an average performance deterioration of 19.4%, and slight perceptual changes could result in a more alarming 29.1% drop in performance. These findings highlight the urgent need for developing robust countermeasures to ensure the safe and reliable deployment of advanced LLM/VLM-based robotic systems. [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/large-language-models-cyber-security-systematic-literature]

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a mathematical formulation of potential attacks on LLM/VLM-based robotic systems and provides experimental evidence of the safety challenges. The researchers designed a series of experiments to assess the robustness of these systems to adversarial inputs.

In one set of experiments, the team modified the input prompts to the LLM/VLM-based robotic systems in small ways, such as changing a few words or the phrasing. They found that these minor changes resulted in an average performance deterioration of 19.4%.

In another experiment, the researchers made slight perceptual changes to the inputs, such as adding noise or distorting the images. These small alterations led to a more significant 29.1% drop in system performance.

The findings from these experiments demonstrate the vulnerability of LLM/VLM-based robotic systems to adversarial inputs. Even minor changes to the data these models receive can have a dramatic impact on their ability to perform their intended tasks accurately and safely. [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/mllm-protector-ensuring-mllms-safety-without-hurting]

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough and well-designed exploration of the safety challenges associated with integrating LLMs and VLMs into robotic systems. The experimental evidence presented is compelling and highlights the urgent need for further research in this area.

However, the paper does not delve into the potential causes of these vulnerabilities or provide any specific recommendations for how to address them. While the findings are concerning, the paper could have benefited from a more in-depth discussion of the underlying mechanisms that make these models susceptible to adversarial inputs and potential strategies for mitigating these risks.

Additionally, the paper does not consider the broader implications of these safety concerns, such as the ethical and societal implications of deploying potentially unsafe robotic systems in real-world environments. [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/llm-driven-robots-risk-enacting-discrimination-violence]

Overall, the paper makes a valuable contribution to the literature by bringing attention to this critical issue, but there is still room for further exploration and discussion around the development of robust and reliable LLM/VLM-based robotic systems.

Conclusion

This paper highlights the significant safety risks associated with integrating large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs) into robotic systems. The experimental evidence presented demonstrates that these models are highly susceptible to adversarial inputs, which can dramatically reduce their effectiveness and potentially lead to severe consequences in real-world robotic applications.

The findings underscore the urgent need for further research and the development of robust countermeasures to ensure the safe and reliable deployment of advanced LLM/VLM-based robotic systems. As these technologies continue to evolve and become more widely adopted, addressing these safety concerns will be crucial for realizing the full potential of robotics while minimizing the risks to people and property. [https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/mllm-protector-ensuring-mllms-safety-without-hurting]



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📶

Total Score

0

Highlighting the Safety Concerns of Deploying LLMs/VLMs in Robotics

Xiyang Wu, Souradip Chakraborty, Ruiqi Xian, Jing Liang, Tianrui Guan, Fuxiao Liu, Brian M. Sadler, Dinesh Manocha, Amrit Singh Bedi

In this paper, we highlight the critical issues of robustness and safety associated with integrating large language models (LLMs) and vision-language models (VLMs) into robotics applications. Recent works focus on using LLMs and VLMs to improve the performance of robotics tasks, such as manipulation and navigation. Despite these improvements, analyzing the safety of such systems remains underexplored yet extremely critical. LLMs and VLMs are highly susceptible to adversarial inputs, prompting a significant inquiry into the safety of robotic systems. This concern is important because robotics operate in the physical world where erroneous actions can result in severe consequences. This paper explores this issue thoroughly, presenting a mathematical formulation of potential attacks on LLM/VLM-based robotic systems and offering experimental evidence of the safety challenges. Our empirical findings highlight a significant vulnerability: simple modifications to the input can drastically reduce system effectiveness. Specifically, our results demonstrate an average performance deterioration of 19.4% under minor input prompt modifications and a more alarming 29.1% under slight perceptual changes. These findings underscore the urgent need for robust countermeasures to ensure the safe and reliable deployment of advanced LLM/VLM-based robotic systems.

Read more

6/18/2024

LLM-Driven Robots Risk Enacting Discrimination, Violence, and Unlawful Actions
Total Score

0

LLM-Driven Robots Risk Enacting Discrimination, Violence, and Unlawful Actions

Rumaisa Azeem, Andrew Hundt, Masoumeh Mansouri, Martim Brand~ao

Members of the Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) and Artificial Intelligence (AI) communities have proposed Large Language Models (LLMs) as a promising resource for robotics tasks such as natural language interactions, doing household and workplace tasks, approximating `common sense reasoning', and modeling humans. However, recent research has raised concerns about the potential for LLMs to produce discriminatory outcomes and unsafe behaviors in real-world robot experiments and applications. To address these concerns, we conduct an HRI-based evaluation of discrimination and safety criteria on several highly-rated LLMs. Our evaluation reveals that LLMs currently lack robustness when encountering people across a diverse range of protected identity characteristics (e.g., race, gender, disability status, nationality, religion, and their intersections), producing biased outputs consistent with directly discriminatory outcomes -- e.g. `gypsy' and `mute' people are labeled untrustworthy, but not `european' or `able-bodied' people. Furthermore, we test models in settings with unconstrained natural language (open vocabulary) inputs, and find they fail to act safely, generating responses that accept dangerous, violent, or unlawful instructions -- such as incident-causing misstatements, taking people's mobility aids, and sexual predation. Our results underscore the urgent need for systematic, routine, and comprehensive risk assessments and assurances to improve outcomes and ensure LLMs only operate on robots when it is safe, effective, and just to do so. Data and code will be made available.

Read more

6/14/2024

👀

Total Score

0

Safety Alignment for Vision Language Models

Zhendong Liu, Yuanbi Nie, Yingshui Tan, Xiangyu Yue, Qiushi Cui, Chongjun Wang, Xiaoyong Zhu, Bo Zheng

Benefiting from the powerful capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), pre-trained visual encoder models connected to an LLMs can realize Vision Language Models (VLMs). However, existing research shows that the visual modality of VLMs is vulnerable, with attackers easily bypassing LLMs' safety alignment through visual modality features to launch attacks. To address this issue, we enhance the existing VLMs' visual modality safety alignment by adding safety modules, including a safety projector, safety tokens, and a safety head, through a two-stage training process, effectively improving the model's defense against risky images. For example, building upon the LLaVA-v1.5 model, we achieve a safety score of 8.26, surpassing the GPT-4V on the Red Teaming Visual Language Models (RTVLM) benchmark. Our method boasts ease of use, high flexibility, and strong controllability, and it enhances safety while having minimal impact on the model's general performance. Moreover, our alignment strategy also uncovers some possible risky content within commonly used open-source multimodal datasets. Our code will be open sourced after the anonymous review.

Read more

5/24/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Recent Advances in Attack and Defense Approaches of Large Language Models

Jing Cui, Yishi Xu, Zhewei Huang, Shuchang Zhou, Jianbin Jiao, Junge Zhang

Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized artificial intelligence and machine learning through their advanced text processing and generating capabilities. However, their widespread deployment has raised significant safety and reliability concerns. Established vulnerabilities in deep neural networks, coupled with emerging threat models, may compromise security evaluations and create a false sense of security. Given the extensive research in the field of LLM security, we believe that summarizing the current state of affairs will help the research community better understand the present landscape and inform future developments. This paper reviews current research on LLM vulnerabilities and threats, and evaluates the effectiveness of contemporary defense mechanisms. We analyze recent studies on attack vectors and model weaknesses, providing insights into attack mechanisms and the evolving threat landscape. We also examine current defense strategies, highlighting their strengths and limitations. By contrasting advancements in attack and defense methodologies, we identify research gaps and propose future directions to enhance LLM security. Our goal is to advance the understanding of LLM safety challenges and guide the development of more robust security measures.

Read more

9/9/2024