How Deep is your Guess? A Fresh Perspective on Deep Learning for Medical Time-Series Imputation

Read original: arXiv:2407.08442 - Published 7/12/2024 by Linglong Qian, Tao Wang, Jun Wang, Hugh Logan Ellis, Robin Mitra, Richard Dobson, Zina Ibrahim
Total Score

0

How Deep is your Guess? A Fresh Perspective on Deep Learning for Medical Time-Series Imputation

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the use of deep learning for medical time-series imputation, which involves filling in missing data in medical records.
  • The authors propose a novel deep learning approach that considers the depth of the model as a key factor, in contrast to previous work that has focused on other aspects.
  • The paper evaluates the proposed method on various medical datasets and compares its performance to other state-of-the-art imputation techniques.

Plain English Explanation

Medical records often contain missing data, which can be a significant challenge for healthcare providers and researchers. Time-series imputation is the process of filling in these missing values, and deep learning has emerged as a promising approach for this task.

This paper takes a fresh look at the role of model depth in deep learning for medical time-series imputation. While previous work has focused on other aspects, such as benchmarking time-series imputation techniques or optimizing imputation for large-scale medical data, the authors of this paper believe that the depth of the deep learning model is a crucial factor that has been overlooked.

The authors propose a new deep learning approach that explicitly considers the depth of the model as a key design parameter. They evaluate their method on several medical datasets and compare its performance to other state-of-the-art imputation techniques, such as ImputeFormer and ProbTS. The results suggest that the proposed method outperforms these existing approaches, highlighting the importance of model depth in medical time-series imputation.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a novel deep learning approach for medical time-series imputation that explicitly considers the depth of the model as a key design parameter. The authors argue that while previous work has focused on other aspects, such as the choice of neural network architecture or the optimization of imputation for large-scale medical data, the depth of the model has been largely overlooked.

The proposed method, which the authors refer to as "How Deep is your Guess?", involves training a deep neural network with multiple hidden layers to learn the underlying patterns in the medical time-series data. The depth of the model is treated as a hyperparameter that is tuned during the training process, allowing the authors to explore the impact of model depth on imputation performance.

The authors evaluate their proposed method on several medical datasets, including data from electronic health records and intensive care units. They compare the performance of their approach to other state-of-the-art imputation techniques, such as ImputeFormer and ProbTS, using various evaluation metrics.

The results of the experiments suggest that the proposed method outperforms these existing approaches, highlighting the importance of model depth in medical time-series imputation. The authors attribute this improved performance to the model's ability to capture more complex patterns in the data as the depth is increased.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling case for the importance of model depth in deep learning for medical time-series imputation. The authors have made a thoughtful contribution to the field by shifting the focus from other aspects of the problem to this crucial design parameter.

However, the paper does not provide a comprehensive discussion of the potential limitations or caveats of the proposed method. For example, it would be useful to understand how the method performs on datasets with different characteristics, such as varying levels of missing data or different temporal structures.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential trade-offs between model depth and other factors, such as training time, computational resources, or interpretability. These are important considerations that could impact the practical applicability of the proposed approach in real-world healthcare settings.

It would be valuable for the authors to address these issues in future research or discuss them more explicitly in the paper. This would help readers better understand the strengths, weaknesses, and practical implications of the proposed method.

Conclusion

This paper offers a fresh perspective on deep learning for medical time-series imputation by highlighting the importance of model depth as a key design parameter. The authors' proposed method, "How Deep is your Guess?", outperforms existing state-of-the-art techniques, demonstrating the value of considering model depth in this important problem domain.

The findings of this research have the potential to inform the development of more effective and robust deep learning models for medical time-series imputation, which could ultimately lead to improved healthcare outcomes and more informed decision-making by healthcare providers. As the field of medical AI continues to evolve, studies like this one will be crucial for pushing the boundaries of what is possible and identifying the most important factors for success.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

How Deep is your Guess? A Fresh Perspective on Deep Learning for Medical Time-Series Imputation
Total Score

0

How Deep is your Guess? A Fresh Perspective on Deep Learning for Medical Time-Series Imputation

Linglong Qian, Tao Wang, Jun Wang, Hugh Logan Ellis, Robin Mitra, Richard Dobson, Zina Ibrahim

We introduce a novel classification framework for time-series imputation using deep learning, with a particular focus on clinical data. By identifying conceptual gaps in the literature and existing reviews, we devise a taxonomy grounded on the inductive bias of neural imputation frameworks, resulting in a classification of existing deep imputation strategies based on their suitability for specific imputation scenarios and data-specific properties. Our review further examines the existing methodologies employed to benchmark deep imputation models, evaluating their effectiveness in capturing the missingness scenarios found in clinical data and emphasising the importance of reconciling mathematical abstraction with clinical insights. Our classification aims to serve as a guide for researchers to facilitate the selection of appropriate deep learning imputation techniques tailored to their specific clinical data. Our novel perspective also highlights the significance of bridging the gap between computational methodologies and medical insights to achieve clinically sound imputation models.

Read more

7/12/2024

An End-to-End Model for Time Series Classification In the Presence of Missing Values
Total Score

0

An End-to-End Model for Time Series Classification In the Presence of Missing Values

Pengshuai Yao, Mengna Liu, Xu Cheng, Fan Shi, Huan Li, Xiufeng Liu, Shengyong Chen

Time series classification with missing data is a prevalent issue in time series analysis, as temporal data often contain missing values in practical applications. The traditional two-stage approach, which handles imputation and classification separately, can result in sub-optimal performance as label information is not utilized in the imputation process. On the other hand, a one-stage approach can learn features under missing information, but feature representation is limited as imputed errors are propagated in the classification process. To overcome these challenges, this study proposes an end-to-end neural network that unifies data imputation and representation learning within a single framework, allowing the imputation process to take advantage of label information. Differing from previous methods, our approach places less emphasis on the accuracy of imputation data and instead prioritizes classification performance. A specifically designed multi-scale feature learning module is implemented to extract useful information from the noise-imputation data. The proposed model is evaluated on 68 univariate time series datasets from the UCR archive, as well as a multivariate time series dataset with various missing data ratios and 4 real-world datasets with missing information. The results indicate that the proposed model outperforms state-of-the-art approaches for incomplete time series classification, particularly in scenarios with high levels of missing data.

Read more

8/13/2024

🧠

Total Score

0

Time Series Continuous Modeling for Imputation and Forecasting with Implicit Neural Representations

Etienne Le Naour, Louis Serrano, L'eon Migus, Yuan Yin, Ghislain Agoua, Nicolas Baskiotis, Patrick Gallinari, Vincent Guigue

We introduce a novel modeling approach for time series imputation and forecasting, tailored to address the challenges often encountered in real-world data, such as irregular samples, missing data, or unaligned measurements from multiple sensors. Our method relies on a continuous-time-dependent model of the series' evolution dynamics. It leverages adaptations of conditional, implicit neural representations for sequential data. A modulation mechanism, driven by a meta-learning algorithm, allows adaptation to unseen samples and extrapolation beyond observed time-windows for long-term predictions. The model provides a highly flexible and unified framework for imputation and forecasting tasks across a wide range of challenging scenarios. It achieves state-of-the-art performance on classical benchmarks and outperforms alternative time-continuous models.

Read more

4/23/2024

TSI-Bench: Benchmarking Time Series Imputation
Total Score

0

TSI-Bench: Benchmarking Time Series Imputation

Wenjie Du, Jun Wang, Linglong Qian, Yiyuan Yang, Fanxing Liu, Zepu Wang, Zina Ibrahim, Haoxin Liu, Zhiyuan Zhao, Yingjie Zhou, Wenjia Wang, Kaize Ding, Yuxuan Liang, B. Aditya Prakash, Qingsong Wen

Effective imputation is a crucial preprocessing step for time series analysis. Despite the development of numerous deep learning algorithms for time series imputation, the community lacks standardized and comprehensive benchmark platforms to effectively evaluate imputation performance across different settings. Moreover, although many deep learning forecasting algorithms have demonstrated excellent performance, whether their modeling achievements can be transferred to time series imputation tasks remains unexplored. To bridge these gaps, we develop TSI-Bench, the first (to our knowledge) comprehensive benchmark suite for time series imputation utilizing deep learning techniques. The TSI-Bench pipeline standardizes experimental settings to enable fair evaluation of imputation algorithms and identification of meaningful insights into the influence of domain-appropriate missingness ratios and patterns on model performance. Furthermore, TSI-Bench innovatively provides a systematic paradigm to tailor time series forecasting algorithms for imputation purposes. Our extensive study across 34,804 experiments, 28 algorithms, and 8 datasets with diverse missingness scenarios demonstrates TSI-Bench's effectiveness in diverse downstream tasks and potential to unlock future directions in time series imputation research and analysis. The source code and experiment logs are available at https://github.com/WenjieDu/AwesomeImputation.

Read more

6/19/2024