How Do Social Bots Participate in Misinformation Spread? A Comprehensive Dataset and Analysis
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Investigates how social bots participate in spreading misinformation on social media
- Presents a comprehensive dataset and analysis of social bot activity
- Aims to understand the role of bots in amplifying the reach of misinformation
Plain English Explanation
This research paper examines how social bots - automated accounts that simulate human behavior on social media - contribute to the spread of misinformation. The researchers collected a large dataset of social media posts and accounts, and analyzed the patterns of bot activity in the context of misinformation.
The goal was to better understand how bots may be used to amplify the reach and impact of false or misleading information online. This is an important issue, as the rapid spread of misinformation can have significant consequences for public discourse and decision-making.
By analyzing the dataset, the researchers aimed to shed light on the specific tactics and behaviors employed by social bots to contribute to the proliferation of misinformation. This information could then be used to develop more effective strategies for detecting and mitigating bot-driven misinformation campaigns.
Technical Explanation
The researchers collected a comprehensive dataset of social media posts, accounts, and user interactions. This dataset included both human-operated and bot-controlled accounts, as well as content that was classified as either factual or misinformative.
Using this dataset, the researchers conducted a range of analyses to examine the participation of social bots in the spread of misinformation. This included:
- Identifying bot accounts and quantifying their activity levels compared to human users
- Analyzing the types of content shared by bot accounts, and how this differed from human-generated content
- Investigating the strategies used by bots to amplify the reach of misinformative posts, such as retweeting, sharing, or coordinating with other bot accounts
- Examining the network structures and influence dynamics that emerge from bot-driven misinformation campaigns
The findings of this analysis provide important insights into the role of social bots in the misinformation ecosystem. By understanding the specific tactics and behaviors employed by bots, researchers and platform operators can work to develop more effective countermeasures and mitigation strategies.
Critical Analysis
The research presented in this paper provides a comprehensive and rigorous analysis of the relationship between social bots and the spread of misinformation. The dataset and methodological approach appear to be robust, and the findings offer valuable insights into an important and timely issue.
However, it's important to note that the dataset and analysis are limited to a specific time period and social media platform. The extent to which the findings can be generalized to other platforms, time periods, or types of misinformation may be limited.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the broader social, political, or ethical implications of bot-driven misinformation campaigns. While the technical analysis is valuable, it would be helpful to see a deeper discussion of the potential harms and societal impacts of this phenomenon.
Further research could also explore the motivations and incentive structures that drive the creation and use of social bots for the purpose of spreading misinformation. Understanding these underlying factors could inform more effective interventions and policy responses.
Conclusion
This research paper provides a comprehensive analysis of how social bots participate in the spread of misinformation on social media. The findings offer important insights into the specific tactics and behaviors employed by bots, which can inform the development of more effective strategies for detecting and mitigating bot-driven misinformation campaigns.
The research highlights the significant role that social bots can play in amplifying the reach and impact of false or misleading information online. As the use of bots continues to evolve, ongoing monitoring and analysis of their activities will be crucial for preserving the integrity of online discourse and decision-making processes.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
How Do Social Bots Participate in Misinformation Spread? A Comprehensive Dataset and Analysis
Herun Wan, Minnan Luo, Zihan Ma, Guang Dai, Xiang Zhao
Information spreads faster through social media platforms than traditional media, thus becoming an ideal medium to spread misinformation. Meanwhile, automated accounts, known as social bots, contribute more to the misinformation dissemination. In this paper, we explore the interplay between social bots and misinformation on the Sina Weibo platform. We propose a comprehensive and large-scale misinformation dataset, containing 11,393 misinformation and 16,416 unbiased real information with multiple modality information, with 952,955 related users. We propose a scalable weak-surprised method to annotate social bots, obtaining 68,040 social bots and 411,635 genuine accounts. To the best of our knowledge, this dataset is the largest dataset containing misinformation and social bots. We conduct comprehensive experiments and analysis on this dataset. Results show that social bots play a central role in misinformation dissemination, participating in news discussions to amplify echo chambers, manipulate public sentiment, and reverse public stances.
Read more8/20/2024
0
Blended Bots: Infiltration through Identity Deception on Social Media
Samantha C. Phillips, Lynnette Hui Xian Ng, Kathleen M. Carley
Bots are automated social media users that can be used to amplify (mis)information and sow harmful discourse. In order to effectively influence users, bots can be generated to reproduce human user behavior. Indeed, people tend to trust information coming from users with profiles that fit roles they expect to exist, such as users with gender role stereotypes. In this work, we examine differences in the types of identities in profiles of human and bot accounts with a focus on combinations of identities that represent gender role stereotypes. We find that some types of identities differentiate between human and bot profiles, confirming this approach can be a useful in distinguishing between human and bot accounts on social media. However, contrary to our expectations, we reveal that gender bias is expressed more in human accounts than bots overall. Despite having less gender bias overall, we provide examples of identities with strong associations with gender identities in bot profiles, such as those related to technology, finance, sports, and horoscopes. Finally, we discuss implications for designing constructive social media bot detection training materials.
Read more6/11/2024
0
Unmasking Social Bots: How Confident Are We?
James Giroux, Ariyarathne Gangani, Alexander C. Nwala, Cristiano Fanelli
Social bots remain a major vector for spreading disinformation on social media and a menace to the public. Despite the progress made in developing multiple sophisticated social bot detection algorithms and tools, bot detection remains a challenging, unsolved problem that is fraught with uncertainty due to the heterogeneity of bot behaviors, training data, and detection algorithms. Detection models often disagree on whether to label the same account as bot or human-controlled. However, they do not provide any measure of uncertainty to indicate how much we should trust their results. We propose to address both bot detection and the quantification of uncertainty at the account level - a novel feature of this research. This dual focus is crucial as it allows us to leverage additional information related to the quantified uncertainty of each prediction, thereby enhancing decision-making and improving the reliability of bot classifications. Specifically, our approach facilitates targeted interventions for bots when predictions are made with high confidence and suggests caution (e.g., gathering more data) when predictions are uncertain.
Read more7/22/2024
0
AMMeBa: A Large-Scale Survey and Dataset of Media-Based Misinformation In-The-Wild
Nicholas Dufour, Arkanath Pathak, Pouya Samangouei, Nikki Hariri, Shashi Deshetti, Andrew Dudfield, Christopher Guess, Pablo Hern'andez Escayola, Bobby Tran, Mevan Babakar, Christoph Bregler
The prevalence and harms of online misinformation is a perennial concern for internet platforms, institutions and society at large. Over time, information shared online has become more media-heavy and misinformation has readily adapted to these new modalities. The rise of generative AI-based tools, which provide widely-accessible methods for synthesizing realistic audio, images, video and human-like text, have amplified these concerns. Despite intense public interest and significant press coverage, quantitative information on the prevalence and modality of media-based misinformation remains scarce. Here, we present the results of a two-year study using human raters to annotate online media-based misinformation, mostly focusing on images, based on claims assessed in a large sample of publicly-accessible fact checks with the ClaimReview markup. We present an image typology, designed to capture aspects of the image and manipulation relevant to the image's role in the misinformation claim. We visualize the distribution of these types over time. We show the rise of generative AI-based content in misinformation claims, and that its commonality is a relatively recent phenomenon, occurring significantly after heavy press coverage. We also show simple methods dominated historically, particularly context manipulations, and continued to hold a majority as of the end of data collection in November 2023. The dataset, Annotated Misinformation, Media-Based (AMMeBa), is publicly-available, and we hope that these data will serve as both a means of evaluating mitigation methods in a realistic setting and as a first-of-its-kind census of the types and modalities of online misinformation.
Read more5/22/2024