Unmasking Social Bots: How Confident Are We?

Read original: arXiv:2407.13929 - Published 7/22/2024 by James Giroux, Ariyarathne Gangani, Alexander C. Nwala, Cristiano Fanelli
Total Score

0

Unmasking Social Bots: How Confident Are We?

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper examines the challenge of accurately detecting social bots, which are automated accounts on social media.
  • The authors discuss the limitations of current bot detection methods and the need for more robust and reliable techniques.
  • The paper provides insights into the factors that can influence the confidence in bot detection, such as the characteristics of the data and the performance of the detection models.

Plain English Explanation

The paper looks at the difficulty of identifying social bots, which are automated accounts on social media platforms. Current methods for detecting these bots have limitations, and the authors explore the factors that can affect how confident we can be in the results.

For example, the characteristics of the data being analyzed, such as the mix of real and automated accounts, can impact the accuracy of bot detection. The performance of the detection models themselves is also a key factor.

The paper aims to provide insights that can help researchers and platforms develop more trustworthy and reliable methods for identifying social bots, which is important for maintaining the integrity of online discussions and social interactions.

Technical Explanation

The paper explores the challenge of accurately detecting social bots, which are automated accounts on social media platforms. The authors discuss the limitations of current bot detection methods and the need for more robust and reliable techniques.

The paper examines the factors that can influence the confidence in bot detection, including:

  • Data characteristics: The mix of real and automated accounts in the dataset being analyzed can impact the accuracy of bot detection.
  • Model performance: The performance of the bot detection models themselves is a key factor in determining the confidence in the results.

The authors provide insights into how these factors can affect the reliability of bot detection and suggest that developing more trustworthy and reliable methods is crucial for maintaining the integrity of online discussions and social interactions.

Critical Analysis

The paper acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research:

  • Lack of ground truth: The authors note that obtaining reliable ground truth data on social bots is a significant challenge, which can impact the accuracy of bot detection models.
  • Evolving bot tactics: As bot detection methods become more sophisticated, bot developers may also adapt their tactics to evade detection, requiring ongoing research to stay ahead of these adaptations.
  • Contextual factors: The paper suggests that the confidence in bot detection may also depend on contextual factors, such as the specific social media platform or the topic of discussion, which could be an area for future investigation.

While the paper provides valuable insights, the authors caution that bot detection remains a complex and evolving challenge, requiring continued research and development of more robust and trustworthy detection methods.

Conclusion

This paper highlights the significant challenge of accurately detecting social bots on social media platforms. The authors discuss the limitations of current bot detection methods and the factors that can influence the confidence in the results, such as data characteristics and model performance.

The insights provided in this paper suggest that developing more reliable and trustworthy bot detection techniques is crucial for maintaining the integrity of online discussions and social interactions. Ongoing research is needed to stay ahead of the evolving tactics of bot developers and to address the contextual factors that can impact bot detection.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Unmasking Social Bots: How Confident Are We?
Total Score

0

Unmasking Social Bots: How Confident Are We?

James Giroux, Ariyarathne Gangani, Alexander C. Nwala, Cristiano Fanelli

Social bots remain a major vector for spreading disinformation on social media and a menace to the public. Despite the progress made in developing multiple sophisticated social bot detection algorithms and tools, bot detection remains a challenging, unsolved problem that is fraught with uncertainty due to the heterogeneity of bot behaviors, training data, and detection algorithms. Detection models often disagree on whether to label the same account as bot or human-controlled. However, they do not provide any measure of uncertainty to indicate how much we should trust their results. We propose to address both bot detection and the quantification of uncertainty at the account level - a novel feature of this research. This dual focus is crucial as it allows us to leverage additional information related to the quantified uncertainty of each prediction, thereby enhancing decision-making and improving the reliability of bot classifications. Specifically, our approach facilitates targeted interventions for bots when predictions are made with high confidence and suggests caution (e.g., gathering more data) when predictions are uncertain.

Read more

7/22/2024

💬

Total Score

0

What Does the Bot Say? Opportunities and Risks of Large Language Models in Social Media Bot Detection

Shangbin Feng, Herun Wan, Ningnan Wang, Zhaoxuan Tan, Minnan Luo, Yulia Tsvetkov

Social media bot detection has always been an arms race between advancements in machine learning bot detectors and adversarial bot strategies to evade detection. In this work, we bring the arms race to the next level by investigating the opportunities and risks of state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) in social bot detection. To investigate the opportunities, we design novel LLM-based bot detectors by proposing a mixture-of-heterogeneous-experts framework to divide and conquer diverse user information modalities. To illuminate the risks, we explore the possibility of LLM-guided manipulation of user textual and structured information to evade detection. Extensive experiments with three LLMs on two datasets demonstrate that instruction tuning on merely 1,000 annotated examples produces specialized LLMs that outperform state-of-the-art baselines by up to 9.1% on both datasets, while LLM-guided manipulation strategies could significantly bring down the performance of existing bot detectors by up to 29.6% and harm the calibration and reliability of bot detection systems.

Read more

7/8/2024

🔎

Total Score

0

Adversarial Botometer: Adversarial Analysis for Social Bot Detection

Shaghayegh Najari, Davood Rafiee, Mostafa Salehi, Reza Farahbakhsh

Social bots play a significant role in many online social networks (OSN) as they imitate human behavior. This fact raises difficult questions about their capabilities and potential risks. Given the recent advances in Generative AI (GenAI), social bots are capable of producing highly realistic and complex content that mimics human creativity. As the malicious social bots emerge to deceive people with their unrealistic content, identifying them and distinguishing the content they produce has become an actual challenge for numerous social platforms. Several approaches to this problem have already been proposed in the literature, but the proposed solutions have not been widely evaluated. To address this issue, we evaluate the behavior of a text-based bot detector in a competitive environment where some scenarios are proposed: textit{First}, the tug-of-war between a bot and a bot detector is examined. It is interesting to analyze which party is more likely to prevail and which circumstances influence these expectations. In this regard, we model the problem as a synthetic adversarial game in which a conversational bot and a bot detector are engaged in strategic online interactions. textit{Second}, the bot detection model is evaluated under attack examples generated by a social bot; to this end, we poison the dataset with attack examples and evaluate the model performance under this condition. textit{Finally}, to investigate the impact of the dataset, a cross-domain analysis is performed. Through our comprehensive evaluation of different categories of social bots using two benchmark datasets, we were able to demonstrate some achivement that could be utilized in future works.

Read more

5/6/2024

🔎

Total Score

0

Multimodal Detection of Bots on X (Twitter) using Transformers

Loukas Ilias, Ioannis Michail Kazelidis, Dimitris Askounis

Although not all bots are malicious, the vast majority of them are responsible for spreading misinformation and manipulating the public opinion about several issues, i.e., elections and many more. Therefore, the early detection of bots is crucial. Although there have been proposed methods for detecting bots in social media, there are still substantial limitations. For instance, existing research initiatives still extract a large number of features and train traditional machine learning algorithms or use GloVe embeddings and train LSTMs. However, feature extraction is a tedious procedure demanding domain expertise. Also, language models based on transformers have been proved to be better than LSTMs. Other approaches create large graphs and train graph neural networks requiring in this way many hours for training and access to computational resources. To tackle these limitations, this is the first study employing only the user description field and images of three channels denoting the type and content of tweets posted by the users. Firstly, we create digital DNA sequences, transform them to 3d images, and apply pretrained models of the vision domain, including EfficientNet, AlexNet, VGG16, etc. Next, we propose a multimodal approach, where we use TwHIN-BERT for getting the textual representation of the user description field and employ VGG16 for acquiring the visual representation for the image modality. We propose three different fusion methods, namely concatenation, gated multimodal unit, and crossmodal attention, for fusing the different modalities and compare their performances. Finally, we present a qualitative analysis of the behavior of our best performing model. Extensive experiments conducted on the Cresci'17 and TwiBot-20 datasets demonstrate valuable advantages of our introduced approaches over state-of-the-art ones.

Read more

7/25/2024