How Efficient is LLM-Generated Code? A Rigorous & High-Standard Benchmark
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a rigorous and high-standard benchmark to evaluate the efficiency of code generated by large language models (LLMs).
- The benchmark covers a wide range of programming tasks and assesses factors like code correctness, performance, and maintainability.
- The authors find that while LLM-generated code can be functional, it often underperforms hand-written code in terms of efficiency and quality.
Plain English Explanation
This paper tackles an important question: How efficient is the code that large language models (LLMs) can generate? LLMs are AI systems that can produce human-like text, and researchers are exploring whether they can also be used to write computer code. However, the quality and performance of this LLM-generated code has been unclear.
The researchers in this paper developed a comprehensive benchmark to rigorously evaluate LLM-generated code across a wide range of programming tasks. They looked at factors like whether the code is correct and runs properly, how efficiently it performs, and how easy it is to maintain and understand.
The results show that while LLM-generated code can sometimes work, it often falls short compared to code written by human programmers. The LLM-generated code may have issues with efficiency, correctness, or maintainability. This suggests that while LLMs are impressive in many ways, they still have significant limitations when it comes to generating high-quality, production-ready code.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating the efficiency and quality of code generated by large language models (LLMs). The benchmark covers a diverse set of programming tasks, including algorithmic problems, data manipulation, and software engineering challenges.
The researchers assess the LLM-generated code across several key dimensions:
- Correctness: Whether the code functions as intended and passes test cases.
- Performance: How efficiently the code executes in terms of runtime and resource usage.
- Maintainability: How readable, modular, and documented the code is.
To provide a rigorous and high-quality evaluation, the benchmark incorporates best practices from prior surveys on LLM code generation and benchmarking methodologies.
The authors find that while LLM-generated code can be functional, it often underperforms hand-written code in terms of efficiency and quality. The LLM-generated solutions tend to have issues with correctness, performance, and maintainability, suggesting that current LLMs still have significant limitations when it comes to generating production-ready code.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a thoughtful and comprehensive benchmark for evaluating LLM-generated code, addressing important limitations of prior work in this area. By assessing a wide range of programming tasks and focusing on key dimensions like correctness, performance, and maintainability, the researchers provide a rigorous and high-standard assessment of LLM capabilities.
However, the paper does acknowledge some caveats and limitations. For example, the benchmark may not capture the full potential of LLMs, as the models were not fine-tuned or prompted specifically for the evaluated tasks. Additionally, the paper does not explore how LLM-generated code could be iteratively improved or combined with human input to achieve better results.
Further research could investigate ways to enhance the efficiency and quality of LLM-generated code, such as by developing specialized prompting strategies, introducing code-specific architectural modifications, or integrating the LLMs with traditional software engineering workflows. Exploring the potential complementarity of human and machine-generated code could also be a fruitful area of investigation.
Conclusion
This paper presents a comprehensive and rigorous benchmark for evaluating the efficiency and quality of code generated by large language models (LLMs). The results suggest that while LLM-generated code can be functional, it often underperforms hand-written code in terms of correctness, performance, and maintainability.
These findings highlight the current limitations of LLMs when it comes to generating production-ready code, despite the models' impressive capabilities in other language-related tasks. As the field of AI-assisted coding continues to evolve, this benchmark provides a valuable framework for assessing the progress and real-world applicability of LLM-generated code.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
How Efficient is LLM-Generated Code? A Rigorous & High-Standard Benchmark
Ruizhong Qiu, Weiliang Will Zeng, Hanghang Tong, James Ezick, Christopher Lott
The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has significantly pushed the frontiers of program synthesis. Advancement of LLM-based program synthesis calls for a thorough evaluation of LLM-generated code. Most evaluation frameworks focus on the (functional) correctness of generated code; efficiency, as an important measure of code quality, has been overlooked in existing evaluations. In this work, we develop ENAMEL (EfficeNcy AutoMatic EvaLuator), a rigorous and high-standard benchmark for evaluating the capability of LLMs in generating efficient code. Firstly, we propose a new efficiency metric called eff@k, which generalizes the pass@k metric from correctness to efficiency and appropriately handles right-censored execution time. Furthermore, we derive an unbiased and variance-reduced estimator of eff@k via Rao--Blackwellization; we also provide a numerically stable implementation for the new estimator. Secondly, to set a high-standard for efficiency evaluation, we employ a human expert to design best algorithms and implementations as our reference solutions of efficiency, many of which are much more efficient than existing canonical solutions in HumanEval and HumanEval+. Moreover, to ensure a rigorous evaluation, we employ a human expert to curate strong test case generators to filter out wrong code and differentiate suboptimal algorithms. An extensive study across 30 popular LLMs using our benchmark ENAMEL shows that LLMs still fall short of generating expert-level efficient code. Using two subsets of our problem set, we demonstrate that such deficiency is because current LLMs struggle in designing advanced algorithms and are barely aware of implementation optimization. Our benchmark is publicly available at https://github.com/q-rz/enamel .
Read more6/18/2024
0
A Performance Study of LLM-Generated Code on Leetcode
Tristan Coignion, Cl'ement Quinton, Romain Rouvoy
This study evaluates the efficiency of code generation by Large Language Models (LLMs) and measures their performance against human-crafted solutions using a dataset from Leetcode. We compare 18 LLMs, considering factors such as model temperature and success rate, and their impact on code performance. This research introduces a novel method for measuring and comparing the speed of LLM-generated code, revealing that LLMs produce code with comparable performance, irrespective of the adopted LLM. We also find that LLMs are capable of generating code that is, on average, more efficient than the code written by humans. The paper further discusses the use of Leetcode as a benchmarking dataset, the limitations imposed by potential data contamination, and the platform's measurement reliability. We believe that our findings contribute to a better understanding of LLM capabilities in code generation and set the stage for future optimizations in the field.
Read more8/1/2024
0
What's Wrong with Your Code Generated by Large Language Models? An Extensive Study
Shihan Dou, Haoxiang Jia, Shenxi Wu, Huiyuan Zheng, Weikang Zhou, Muling Wu, Mingxu Chai, Jessica Fan, Caishuang Huang, Yunbo Tao, Yan Liu, Enyu Zhou, Ming Zhang, Yuhao Zhou, Yueming Wu, Rui Zheng, Ming Wen, Rongxiang Weng, Jingang Wang, Xunliang Cai, Tao Gui, Xipeng Qiu, Qi Zhang, Xuanjing Huang
The increasing development of large language models (LLMs) in code generation has drawn significant attention among researchers. To enhance LLM-based code generation ability, current efforts are predominantly directed towards collecting high-quality datasets and leveraging diverse training technologies. However, there is a notable lack of comprehensive studies examining the limitations and boundaries of these existing methods. To bridge this gap, we conducted an extensive empirical study evaluating the performance of three leading closed-source LLMs and four popular open-source LLMs on three commonly used benchmarks. Our investigation, which evaluated the length, cyclomatic complexity and API number of the generated code, revealed that these LLMs face challenges in generating successful code for more complex problems, and tend to produce code that is shorter yet more complicated as compared to canonical solutions. Additionally, we developed a taxonomy of bugs for incorrect codes that includes three categories and 12 sub-categories, and analyze the root cause for common bug types. Furthermore, to better understand the performance of LLMs in real-world projects, we manually created a real-world benchmark comprising 140 code generation tasks. Our analysis highlights distinct differences in bug distributions between actual scenarios and existing benchmarks. Finally, we propose a novel training-free iterative method that introduces self-critique, enabling LLMs to critique and correct their generated code based on bug types and compiler feedback. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach can significantly mitigate bugs and increase the passing rate by 29.2% after two iterations, indicating substantial potential for LLMs to handle more complex problems.
Read more7/9/2024
0
The Efficiency Spectrum of Large Language Models: An Algorithmic Survey
Tianyu Ding, Tianyi Chen, Haidong Zhu, Jiachen Jiang, Yiqi Zhong, Jinxin Zhou, Guangzhi Wang, Zhihui Zhu, Ilya Zharkov, Luming Liang
The rapid growth of Large Language Models (LLMs) has been a driving force in transforming various domains, reshaping the artificial general intelligence landscape. However, the increasing computational and memory demands of these models present substantial challenges, hindering both academic research and practical applications. To address these issues, a wide array of methods, including both algorithmic and hardware solutions, have been developed to enhance the efficiency of LLMs. This survey delivers a comprehensive review of algorithmic advancements aimed at improving LLM efficiency. Unlike other surveys that typically focus on specific areas such as training or model compression, this paper examines the multi-faceted dimensions of efficiency essential for the end-to-end algorithmic development of LLMs. Specifically, it covers various topics related to efficiency, including scaling laws, data utilization, architectural innovations, training and tuning strategies, and inference techniques. This paper aims to serve as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners, laying the groundwork for future innovations in this critical research area. Our repository of relevant references is maintained at url{https://github.com/tding1/Efficient-LLM-Survey}.
Read more4/22/2024